利益相关者还是股东?董事会成员的个人价值观和企业形象

IF 0.7 4区 管理学 Q4 BUSINESS Rbgn-Revista Brasileira De Gestao De Negocios Pub Date : 2016-08-30 DOI:10.7819/RBGN.V18I61.3020
Edson Ricardo Barbero, Marcello Marchiano
{"title":"利益相关者还是股东?董事会成员的个人价值观和企业形象","authors":"Edson Ricardo Barbero, Marcello Marchiano","doi":"10.7819/RBGN.V18I61.3020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – This article diagnoses the relationship between the value priorities of board members in Brazil and their companies’ identities trending towards stakeholders or shareholders. The paper tested five hypotheses referring to the fact that board members of profitoriented companies are more individualistic, while board members of stakeholder-oriented companies tend to be more collectivist. Design/methodology/approach – A survey was carried out through the Schwartz (1992) values inventory with 74 board members in Brazil. The Brazilian Corporate Sustainability Index (ISE) was considered a proxy for stakeholder orientation. The Mann-Whitney test was used in order to verify if the two independent samples were drawn from populations with equal averages. Findings – In partial consonance with previous research, the board members of stakeholder-oriented companies – those participating in the Corporate Sustainability Index – held less individualistic values. However, for individualistic motivational types, only Stimulation and Hedonism were more frequent in companies not participating in the ISE index. Originality/value – This result amplifies the predictive power of individual values and complements the work of Adams, Licht and Sagiv (2011), which experimentally studied the same relationship within individual choices and in a controlled situation. This article enhances the theory by incorporating the organizational level into the debate. The results suggest that other factors also influence pro-shareholder or pro-stakeholder corporate orientation.","PeriodicalId":45001,"journal":{"name":"Rbgn-Revista Brasileira De Gestao De Negocios","volume":"18 1","pages":"348-369"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stakeholders or Shareholders? Board members’ personal values and corporate identity\",\"authors\":\"Edson Ricardo Barbero, Marcello Marchiano\",\"doi\":\"10.7819/RBGN.V18I61.3020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose – This article diagnoses the relationship between the value priorities of board members in Brazil and their companies’ identities trending towards stakeholders or shareholders. The paper tested five hypotheses referring to the fact that board members of profitoriented companies are more individualistic, while board members of stakeholder-oriented companies tend to be more collectivist. Design/methodology/approach – A survey was carried out through the Schwartz (1992) values inventory with 74 board members in Brazil. The Brazilian Corporate Sustainability Index (ISE) was considered a proxy for stakeholder orientation. The Mann-Whitney test was used in order to verify if the two independent samples were drawn from populations with equal averages. Findings – In partial consonance with previous research, the board members of stakeholder-oriented companies – those participating in the Corporate Sustainability Index – held less individualistic values. However, for individualistic motivational types, only Stimulation and Hedonism were more frequent in companies not participating in the ISE index. Originality/value – This result amplifies the predictive power of individual values and complements the work of Adams, Licht and Sagiv (2011), which experimentally studied the same relationship within individual choices and in a controlled situation. This article enhances the theory by incorporating the organizational level into the debate. The results suggest that other factors also influence pro-shareholder or pro-stakeholder corporate orientation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rbgn-Revista Brasileira De Gestao De Negocios\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"348-369\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rbgn-Revista Brasileira De Gestao De Negocios\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7819/RBGN.V18I61.3020\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rbgn-Revista Brasileira De Gestao De Negocios","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7819/RBGN.V18I61.3020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的-本文诊断了巴西董事会成员的价值优先级与其公司倾向于利益相关者或股东的身份之间的关系。本文检验了五个假设,即利润导向型公司的董事会成员更具有个人主义倾向,而利益相关者导向型公司的董事会成员更具有集体主义倾向。设计/方法/方法-通过施瓦茨(1992)价值观清单对巴西的74名董事会成员进行了调查。巴西企业可持续发展指数(ISE)被认为是利益相关者导向的代理。使用曼-惠特尼检验是为了验证两个独立的样本是否来自具有相同平均值的人群。研究结果-与先前的研究部分一致,以利益相关者为导向的公司的董事会成员-那些参与企业可持续发展指数的公司-持有较少的个人主义价值观。然而,对于个人主义动机类型,只有刺激和享乐主义在未参与ISE指数的公司中更常见。原创性/价值——这一结果放大了个人价值的预测能力,并补充了Adams, light和Sagiv(2011)的工作,他们在实验中研究了个人选择和受控情况下的相同关系。本文通过将组织层面纳入辩论来加强理论。结果表明,其他因素也会影响亲股东或亲利益相关者的企业取向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stakeholders or Shareholders? Board members’ personal values and corporate identity
Purpose – This article diagnoses the relationship between the value priorities of board members in Brazil and their companies’ identities trending towards stakeholders or shareholders. The paper tested five hypotheses referring to the fact that board members of profitoriented companies are more individualistic, while board members of stakeholder-oriented companies tend to be more collectivist. Design/methodology/approach – A survey was carried out through the Schwartz (1992) values inventory with 74 board members in Brazil. The Brazilian Corporate Sustainability Index (ISE) was considered a proxy for stakeholder orientation. The Mann-Whitney test was used in order to verify if the two independent samples were drawn from populations with equal averages. Findings – In partial consonance with previous research, the board members of stakeholder-oriented companies – those participating in the Corporate Sustainability Index – held less individualistic values. However, for individualistic motivational types, only Stimulation and Hedonism were more frequent in companies not participating in the ISE index. Originality/value – This result amplifies the predictive power of individual values and complements the work of Adams, Licht and Sagiv (2011), which experimentally studied the same relationship within individual choices and in a controlled situation. This article enhances the theory by incorporating the organizational level into the debate. The results suggest that other factors also influence pro-shareholder or pro-stakeholder corporate orientation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
16
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊最新文献
Perception of organizational justice and home office work performance: influence of affective commitment Testing the contributions of outside directors: should family firms respond differently? Exploring hidden topics on hotel Facebook fan pages before and during the COVID-19 crisis Micro-entrepreneurs in the creative industry: how resilience overcomes the impacts of the pandemic Antecedents and consequences of brand tribes in sports organizations:the role of brand personality dimensions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1