肺超声诊断新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的应用:一项横断面研究

Sinchana G. Bhat, G. Shreekrishna, G. Shwetha
{"title":"肺超声诊断新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的应用:一项横断面研究","authors":"Sinchana G. Bhat, G. Shreekrishna, G. Shwetha","doi":"10.7860/ijnmr/2023/59688.2383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) is one of the most common conditions leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis with a non-invasive imaging tool such as ultrasound, with no radiation hazard will be beneficial for timely intervention in neonates. Aim: To evaluate the utility of Lung Ultrasound (LUS) in diagnosing RDS in neonates and to compare it with chest X-ray (CXR). Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Department of Pediatrics, AJ Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, India, from June 2017 to December 2018. Forty neonates (preterm and term) admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) with symptoms of respiratory distress within six hours of life and fulfilling clinical criteria of RDS were included in the study. CXR and LUS were performed and interpreted by the same radiologist. The disease was graded as mild and severe by LUS based on the indices like B (Beam like comet-tail pattern) lines, alveolar consolidation, air bronchogram and white lung and it was compared with CXR in terms of sensitivity and specificity to diagnose RDS. Data were statistically analysed using Kendall’s tau-b test. Results: Eighteen (45%) neonates were <32 weeks, 19 (47%), between 32-34 weeks and 3 (7.5%) were >34 weeks of gestation. Twenty-six (65%) were males and 14 (35%) were females. Mean gestational age of the study cohort was 32±2 weeks. Mean birth weight in the study group was 1.7±0.5 kg. 14 out of the 40 neonates (65%) received steroids prior to delivery. LUS detected signs of RDS in all the 40 cases (100% sensitivity). Sixteen out of 40 (40%) neonates were graded as mild RDS and 24 out of 40 neonates (60%) as severe RDS. The sensitivity to detect severe cases was 100% when compared to CXR but specificity to detect mild cases was found to be 59%. The Positive Predictability Value (PPV) was found to be 54% and the Negative Predictable Value (NPV) was found to be 100%. Conclusion: LUS can be used as a reliable, bed side screening tool for the early diagnosis of RDS in NICU without side-effects of radiation.","PeriodicalId":31116,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Neonatal Medicine and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of Lung Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Neonates: A Cross-sectional Study\",\"authors\":\"Sinchana G. Bhat, G. Shreekrishna, G. Shwetha\",\"doi\":\"10.7860/ijnmr/2023/59688.2383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) is one of the most common conditions leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis with a non-invasive imaging tool such as ultrasound, with no radiation hazard will be beneficial for timely intervention in neonates. Aim: To evaluate the utility of Lung Ultrasound (LUS) in diagnosing RDS in neonates and to compare it with chest X-ray (CXR). Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Department of Pediatrics, AJ Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, India, from June 2017 to December 2018. Forty neonates (preterm and term) admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) with symptoms of respiratory distress within six hours of life and fulfilling clinical criteria of RDS were included in the study. CXR and LUS were performed and interpreted by the same radiologist. The disease was graded as mild and severe by LUS based on the indices like B (Beam like comet-tail pattern) lines, alveolar consolidation, air bronchogram and white lung and it was compared with CXR in terms of sensitivity and specificity to diagnose RDS. Data were statistically analysed using Kendall’s tau-b test. Results: Eighteen (45%) neonates were <32 weeks, 19 (47%), between 32-34 weeks and 3 (7.5%) were >34 weeks of gestation. Twenty-six (65%) were males and 14 (35%) were females. Mean gestational age of the study cohort was 32±2 weeks. Mean birth weight in the study group was 1.7±0.5 kg. 14 out of the 40 neonates (65%) received steroids prior to delivery. LUS detected signs of RDS in all the 40 cases (100% sensitivity). Sixteen out of 40 (40%) neonates were graded as mild RDS and 24 out of 40 neonates (60%) as severe RDS. The sensitivity to detect severe cases was 100% when compared to CXR but specificity to detect mild cases was found to be 59%. The Positive Predictability Value (PPV) was found to be 54% and the Negative Predictable Value (NPV) was found to be 100%. Conclusion: LUS can be used as a reliable, bed side screening tool for the early diagnosis of RDS in NICU without side-effects of radiation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Neonatal Medicine and Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Neonatal Medicine and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7860/ijnmr/2023/59688.2383\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Neonatal Medicine and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7860/ijnmr/2023/59688.2383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)是导致显著发病率和死亡率的最常见疾病之一。采用无辐射危害的超声等无创成像工具进行早期诊断,有利于新生儿的及时干预。目的:探讨肺超声(LUS)对新生儿RDS的诊断价值,并与x线胸片(CXR)进行比较。材料与方法:于2017年6月至2018年12月在印度卡纳塔克邦芒格洛尔AJ医学科学研究所儿科三级医院进行横断面研究。研究纳入了40例新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的新生儿(早产儿和足月),这些新生儿在出生后6小时内出现呼吸窘迫症状,符合RDS的临床标准。CXR和LUS由同一放射科医生进行和解释。LUS根据B(束状彗星尾型)线、肺泡实变、空气支气管图、白肺等指标分为轻、重度,并与CXR诊断RDS的敏感性和特异性进行比较。数据采用Kendall 's tau-b检验进行统计学分析。结果:18例(45%)新生儿妊娠34周。男性26人(65%),女性14人(35%)。研究队列的平均胎龄为32±2周。研究组平均出生体重为1.7±0.5 kg。40名新生儿中有14名(65%)在分娩前接受了类固醇治疗。LUS在所有40例患者中均检测到RDS征象(100%灵敏度)。40名新生儿中有16名(40%)被评为轻度RDS, 40名新生儿中有24名(60%)被评为重度RDS。与CXR相比,检测重症病例的敏感性为100%,检测轻度病例的特异性为59%。正面可预测性值(PPV)为54%,负面可预测性值(NPV)为100%。结论:LUS可作为NICU早期诊断RDS的可靠的床侧筛查工具,无放射副反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Utility of Lung Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Neonates: A Cross-sectional Study
Introduction: Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) is one of the most common conditions leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis with a non-invasive imaging tool such as ultrasound, with no radiation hazard will be beneficial for timely intervention in neonates. Aim: To evaluate the utility of Lung Ultrasound (LUS) in diagnosing RDS in neonates and to compare it with chest X-ray (CXR). Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Department of Pediatrics, AJ Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, India, from June 2017 to December 2018. Forty neonates (preterm and term) admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) with symptoms of respiratory distress within six hours of life and fulfilling clinical criteria of RDS were included in the study. CXR and LUS were performed and interpreted by the same radiologist. The disease was graded as mild and severe by LUS based on the indices like B (Beam like comet-tail pattern) lines, alveolar consolidation, air bronchogram and white lung and it was compared with CXR in terms of sensitivity and specificity to diagnose RDS. Data were statistically analysed using Kendall’s tau-b test. Results: Eighteen (45%) neonates were <32 weeks, 19 (47%), between 32-34 weeks and 3 (7.5%) were >34 weeks of gestation. Twenty-six (65%) were males and 14 (35%) were females. Mean gestational age of the study cohort was 32±2 weeks. Mean birth weight in the study group was 1.7±0.5 kg. 14 out of the 40 neonates (65%) received steroids prior to delivery. LUS detected signs of RDS in all the 40 cases (100% sensitivity). Sixteen out of 40 (40%) neonates were graded as mild RDS and 24 out of 40 neonates (60%) as severe RDS. The sensitivity to detect severe cases was 100% when compared to CXR but specificity to detect mild cases was found to be 59%. The Positive Predictability Value (PPV) was found to be 54% and the Negative Predictable Value (NPV) was found to be 100%. Conclusion: LUS can be used as a reliable, bed side screening tool for the early diagnosis of RDS in NICU without side-effects of radiation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Transcranial Ultrasonography Doppler in Detecting Clinical Outcome of Term Neonates with Perinatal Asphyxia: A Longitudinal Study Effect of Hypoxic Ischaemic Encephalopathy on Coagulation Profile in Neonates in a Tertiary Care Center, Agra- A Prospective Clinical Study Mid Upper Arm Circumference as the Best Surrogate Marker for Identification of Low Birth Weight in Newborns within the First 24 Hours of Life- A Cross-sectional Study A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study of Paediatric Dermatoses during the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bengaluru, Karnataka, India Clinico-epidemiological Characteristics and Short-term Outcomes of Neonates Born to COVID-19 Positive Mothers at a Tertiary Care Hospital in North Karnataka- A Retrospective Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1