印度喀拉拉邦三级保健癌症中心从各种临床样本中分离出的肠杆菌科扩展谱β -内酰胺酶编码基因的患病率

S. Samuel, O. Neeraja, R. Parthiban, M. Saravanan, K. Sarath
{"title":"印度喀拉拉邦三级保健癌症中心从各种临床样本中分离出的肠杆菌科扩展谱β -内酰胺酶编码基因的患病率","authors":"S. Samuel, O. Neeraja, R. Parthiban, M. Saravanan, K. Sarath","doi":"10.7860/njlm/2022/51722.2589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Cancer patients are disproportionately at high risk of developing infections, with a risk of infection about 10 times than that of non cancer patients. Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamases (ESBLs) enzyme producing gram-negative bacteria have been marked as one of the “serious” threat by the centre for disease control. This enzyme has the ability to hydrolyse the beta-lactam antibiotics and posses a major threat for the immunocompromised and cancer patients. Hence, understanding its prevalence at the grammatical level is important to decide upon the type of drugs to be prescribed. Aim: To study the prevalence of ESBL genes among the Gram- Negative Bacteria (GNB) isolated from cancer patients. Materials and Methods: The present study was a hospital- based cross-sectional study carried out in Microbiology Division, Malabar Cancer Centre, Thalassery, Kerala, India, from January to March 2021. Microbiological identification of the causative agents was done by staining, culturing and biochemical methods. Screening of the isolates for ESBL was done using Double Disc Synergy Test (DDST). Antibiotic susceptibility testing was carried out using modified Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. The ESBL producers were genotypically confirmed through Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and typed accordingly. The data were given as average with standard deviation and analysed using Microsoft Excel. Results: Out of 1,310 specimens, 366 (27.9%) were culture positive. Among the GNB, Escherichia coli (50%) followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (46.07%), Proteus (1.96%) and Enterobacter cloacae (0.98%) were the predominant isolates. Most of these ESBL producers (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae) were Multidrug Resistant (MDR). However, significant isolates of Escherichia coli (98.03%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (36.1%), Proteus, (50%) and Enterobacter cloacae (100%) were sensitive to immunocompromised. Among 102 ESBL producers, prevalence of blaTEM (67.64%) was highest followed by blaCTX-M (10.78%), blaSHV (14.70%) and blaOXA (18.62%). All of the ESBL producers tested showed the presence of one of four beta- lactamase encoding genes by PCR. One of the isolate Proteus mirabilis found to be ESBL producer as confirmed by phenotypic methods but lacked ESBL genes. Conclusion: Higher prevalence of ESBL producing strains warrants stringent measures to tackle the spread of MDR strains. Carbapenems can be considered as the drug of choice against ESBL producers. Highly prevalent blaTEM gene could be considered as potential therapeutical and diagnostic target against the ESBL producing GNBs.","PeriodicalId":31115,"journal":{"name":"National Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of Extended Spectrum Beta-lactamase Encoding Genes in Enterobacteriaceae Isolated from Various Clinical Samples in a Tertiary Care Cancer Centre, Kerala, India\",\"authors\":\"S. Samuel, O. Neeraja, R. Parthiban, M. Saravanan, K. Sarath\",\"doi\":\"10.7860/njlm/2022/51722.2589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Cancer patients are disproportionately at high risk of developing infections, with a risk of infection about 10 times than that of non cancer patients. Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamases (ESBLs) enzyme producing gram-negative bacteria have been marked as one of the “serious” threat by the centre for disease control. This enzyme has the ability to hydrolyse the beta-lactam antibiotics and posses a major threat for the immunocompromised and cancer patients. Hence, understanding its prevalence at the grammatical level is important to decide upon the type of drugs to be prescribed. Aim: To study the prevalence of ESBL genes among the Gram- Negative Bacteria (GNB) isolated from cancer patients. Materials and Methods: The present study was a hospital- based cross-sectional study carried out in Microbiology Division, Malabar Cancer Centre, Thalassery, Kerala, India, from January to March 2021. Microbiological identification of the causative agents was done by staining, culturing and biochemical methods. Screening of the isolates for ESBL was done using Double Disc Synergy Test (DDST). Antibiotic susceptibility testing was carried out using modified Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. The ESBL producers were genotypically confirmed through Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and typed accordingly. The data were given as average with standard deviation and analysed using Microsoft Excel. Results: Out of 1,310 specimens, 366 (27.9%) were culture positive. Among the GNB, Escherichia coli (50%) followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (46.07%), Proteus (1.96%) and Enterobacter cloacae (0.98%) were the predominant isolates. Most of these ESBL producers (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae) were Multidrug Resistant (MDR). However, significant isolates of Escherichia coli (98.03%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (36.1%), Proteus, (50%) and Enterobacter cloacae (100%) were sensitive to immunocompromised. Among 102 ESBL producers, prevalence of blaTEM (67.64%) was highest followed by blaCTX-M (10.78%), blaSHV (14.70%) and blaOXA (18.62%). All of the ESBL producers tested showed the presence of one of four beta- lactamase encoding genes by PCR. One of the isolate Proteus mirabilis found to be ESBL producer as confirmed by phenotypic methods but lacked ESBL genes. Conclusion: Higher prevalence of ESBL producing strains warrants stringent measures to tackle the spread of MDR strains. Carbapenems can be considered as the drug of choice against ESBL producers. Highly prevalent blaTEM gene could be considered as potential therapeutical and diagnostic target against the ESBL producing GNBs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"National Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"National Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7860/njlm/2022/51722.2589\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7860/njlm/2022/51722.2589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:癌症患者发生感染的风险高得不成比例,其感染风险约为非癌症患者的10倍。产生革兰氏阴性细菌的广谱β -内酰胺酶(ESBLs)酶已被疾病控制中心列为“严重”威胁之一。这种酶具有水解β -内酰胺类抗生素的能力,对免疫功能低下和癌症患者具有重大威胁。因此,了解其在语法层面的流行程度对于决定要开的药物类型是很重要的。目的:研究肿瘤患者革兰氏阴性菌(GNB)中ESBL基因的流行情况。材料和方法:本研究是一项基于医院的横断面研究,于2021年1月至3月在印度喀拉拉邦Thalassery的Malabar癌症中心微生物科进行。采用染色法、培养法和生化法对病原菌进行微生物鉴定。采用双盘协同试验(DDST)对分离株进行ESBL筛选。采用改良Kirby-Bauer盘片扩散法进行药敏试验。通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)对ESBL生产者进行基因型鉴定并分型。数据取平均值,取标准差,用Microsoft Excel进行分析。结果:1310例标本中培养阳性366例(27.9%)。GNB中以大肠埃希菌(50%)、肺炎克雷伯菌(46.07%)、变形杆菌(1.96%)和阴沟肠杆菌(0.98%)为主;大多数ESBL产生菌(大肠杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌)具有多重耐药(MDR)。大肠埃希菌(98.03%)、肺炎克雷伯菌(36.1%)、变形杆菌(50%)和阴沟肠杆菌(100%)对免疫功能低下敏感。102个ESBL生产者中,blaTEM(67.64%)患病率最高,其次是blaCTX-M(10.78%)、blaSHV(14.70%)和blaOXA(18.62%)。所有被检测的ESBL生产者都通过PCR显示存在四种β -内酰胺酶编码基因中的一种。其中一株奇异变形杆菌经表型分析证实为ESBL产生菌,但缺乏ESBL基因。结论:ESBL生产菌株的高流行率需要采取严格的措施来应对耐多药菌株的传播。碳青霉烯类可以被认为是针对ESBL生产者的首选药物。高度流行的blaTEM基因可以被认为是治疗和诊断ESBL产生gnb的潜在靶点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prevalence of Extended Spectrum Beta-lactamase Encoding Genes in Enterobacteriaceae Isolated from Various Clinical Samples in a Tertiary Care Cancer Centre, Kerala, India
Introduction: Cancer patients are disproportionately at high risk of developing infections, with a risk of infection about 10 times than that of non cancer patients. Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamases (ESBLs) enzyme producing gram-negative bacteria have been marked as one of the “serious” threat by the centre for disease control. This enzyme has the ability to hydrolyse the beta-lactam antibiotics and posses a major threat for the immunocompromised and cancer patients. Hence, understanding its prevalence at the grammatical level is important to decide upon the type of drugs to be prescribed. Aim: To study the prevalence of ESBL genes among the Gram- Negative Bacteria (GNB) isolated from cancer patients. Materials and Methods: The present study was a hospital- based cross-sectional study carried out in Microbiology Division, Malabar Cancer Centre, Thalassery, Kerala, India, from January to March 2021. Microbiological identification of the causative agents was done by staining, culturing and biochemical methods. Screening of the isolates for ESBL was done using Double Disc Synergy Test (DDST). Antibiotic susceptibility testing was carried out using modified Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. The ESBL producers were genotypically confirmed through Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and typed accordingly. The data were given as average with standard deviation and analysed using Microsoft Excel. Results: Out of 1,310 specimens, 366 (27.9%) were culture positive. Among the GNB, Escherichia coli (50%) followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (46.07%), Proteus (1.96%) and Enterobacter cloacae (0.98%) were the predominant isolates. Most of these ESBL producers (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae) were Multidrug Resistant (MDR). However, significant isolates of Escherichia coli (98.03%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (36.1%), Proteus, (50%) and Enterobacter cloacae (100%) were sensitive to immunocompromised. Among 102 ESBL producers, prevalence of blaTEM (67.64%) was highest followed by blaCTX-M (10.78%), blaSHV (14.70%) and blaOXA (18.62%). All of the ESBL producers tested showed the presence of one of four beta- lactamase encoding genes by PCR. One of the isolate Proteus mirabilis found to be ESBL producer as confirmed by phenotypic methods but lacked ESBL genes. Conclusion: Higher prevalence of ESBL producing strains warrants stringent measures to tackle the spread of MDR strains. Carbapenems can be considered as the drug of choice against ESBL producers. Highly prevalent blaTEM gene could be considered as potential therapeutical and diagnostic target against the ESBL producing GNBs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Seroprevalence of Rubella Virus Infection in Susceptible Women of Childbearing Age Group Seeking Preconceptional Counselling and Infertility Treatment- A Cross-sectional Study from Eastern India Significance of Immunohistochemistry Testing in the Diagnosis and Subtyping of Lung Carcinomas- A Retrospective Study from a Tertiary Care Centre in Southern Rajasthan Squash Cytology versus Frozen Section for Intraoperative Diagnosis of Lesions of Central Nervous System: A Cross-sectional Study Can Rapid Antigen Tests Lessen the Burden on Testing Laboratories? An Evaluation of the Testing Methods during the COVID-19 Pandemic Spectrum of Enteric Parasitic Infections in Immunocompromised and Immunocompetent Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital, New Delhi- A Retrospective Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1