社论:评估工具的有效性

IF 0.4 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Revista Portuguesa de Investigacao Comportamental e Social Pub Date : 2017-02-28 DOI:10.7342/ISMT.RPICS.2017.3.1.49
Helena Espírito Santo
{"title":"社论:评估工具的有效性","authors":"Helena Espírito Santo","doi":"10.7342/ISMT.RPICS.2017.3.1.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given the growing number of papers on the validation and use of evaluation instruments that are submitted to  PJBSR, it may be time to consider the question of validity. The PJBSR expects the authors in their papers to explicitly discuss the validity of the instruments in the Methods section. If the authors use a previously studied instrument with the same format, with the same characteristics of subjects and for the same purpose, then it is sufficient to cite the previous reference. If the instrument is modified, the number of items changed, the objective is different, or the cut-off point is adjusted, then additional information on adaptation must be provided. In the case of new instruments created by the authors, it is essential to clarify the elaboration process, the reliability measures, the results of the pilot study and other information that make trustworthy the use of the evaluation instrument. Here are presented some key concepts in the domain of validity and reliability.","PeriodicalId":52016,"journal":{"name":"Revista Portuguesa de Investigacao Comportamental e Social","volume":"3 1","pages":"1-1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial: A validade nos instrumentos de avaliação\",\"authors\":\"Helena Espírito Santo\",\"doi\":\"10.7342/ISMT.RPICS.2017.3.1.49\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Given the growing number of papers on the validation and use of evaluation instruments that are submitted to  PJBSR, it may be time to consider the question of validity. The PJBSR expects the authors in their papers to explicitly discuss the validity of the instruments in the Methods section. If the authors use a previously studied instrument with the same format, with the same characteristics of subjects and for the same purpose, then it is sufficient to cite the previous reference. If the instrument is modified, the number of items changed, the objective is different, or the cut-off point is adjusted, then additional information on adaptation must be provided. In the case of new instruments created by the authors, it is essential to clarify the elaboration process, the reliability measures, the results of the pilot study and other information that make trustworthy the use of the evaluation instrument. Here are presented some key concepts in the domain of validity and reliability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Portuguesa de Investigacao Comportamental e Social\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"1-1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Portuguesa de Investigacao Comportamental e Social\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7342/ISMT.RPICS.2017.3.1.49\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Portuguesa de Investigacao Comportamental e Social","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7342/ISMT.RPICS.2017.3.1.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

鉴于提交给PJBSR的关于评价工具的验证和使用的论文越来越多,可能是时候考虑有效性问题了。PJBSR希望作者在他们的论文中明确地讨论方法部分中工具的有效性。如果作者使用先前研究过的具有相同格式、相同主题特征和相同目的的仪器,那么引用先前的参考文献就足够了。如果对仪器进行了修改,改变了项目数量,目标不同,或调整了分界点,则必须提供关于适应的额外信息。在作者创建的新工具的情况下,必须澄清制定过程、可靠性措施、试点研究的结果和其他使评估工具的使用值得信赖的信息。本文介绍了效度和信度领域的一些关键概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Editorial: A validade nos instrumentos de avaliação
Given the growing number of papers on the validation and use of evaluation instruments that are submitted to  PJBSR, it may be time to consider the question of validity. The PJBSR expects the authors in their papers to explicitly discuss the validity of the instruments in the Methods section. If the authors use a previously studied instrument with the same format, with the same characteristics of subjects and for the same purpose, then it is sufficient to cite the previous reference. If the instrument is modified, the number of items changed, the objective is different, or the cut-off point is adjusted, then additional information on adaptation must be provided. In the case of new instruments created by the authors, it is essential to clarify the elaboration process, the reliability measures, the results of the pilot study and other information that make trustworthy the use of the evaluation instrument. Here are presented some key concepts in the domain of validity and reliability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Percepção de sorofobia entre homens gays que vivem com HIV Maternidades em terras estrangeiras: Uma scoping review das experiências de mulheres migrantes e refugiadas Cyberloafing in the classroom: A qualitative study with Nigerian undergraduate students Gravidez e depressão pós-parto (DPP): uma revisão não sistemática sobre o estado da arte do conhecimento da DPP Preconceito dos estudantes universitários em relação à deficiência: Um estudo exploratório
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1