[护理性传播疾病患者的护士的专业技能]。

Q3 Medicine Professioni infermieristiche Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.7429/pi.2021.744241
B. Suligoi, A. Luzi, M. Salfa, Giuseppe Esposito
{"title":"[护理性传播疾病患者的护士的专业技能]。","authors":"B. Suligoi, A. Luzi, M. Salfa, Giuseppe Esposito","doi":"10.7429/pi.2021.744241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Accurate pain assessment and management in critically ill patients withcognitive alterations who are unable to communicate constitute a major challenge for themedical and nursing staff of Intensive Care Units (ICUs). This study want assess the impact of Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CCPOT) scale in ICU practice and evaluate the effects on pain assessment and management in brain-injured critically ill adult patients. METHODS This before-and-after study was carried out in an Italian ICU, where data were collected before (T0) and after (T1) implementation of the CCPOT in brain-injured critically ill adults. RESULTS The study population consisted of 81 patients (35 before and 46 after intervention). The use of propofol fell significantly (propofol: t(80) = 1.83) and at the same time the use of morphine increase significantly (morphine: t(80) = 1.51) after intervention.Analysis of the data with respect to pain relief and prevention during some nursing care activities revealed a significant increase in the use of fentanyl citrate (x2(1)= 4.04, p =.04) and paracetamol (x2(1)= 5.30, p =.02). Pain management was in line with the protocol, which envisaged administration of pain medications to patients with CCPOT scores > 3 in 76.8% of cases. CONCLUSION The present findings strongly support the value of the CCPOT scale in managing ICU patient pain in conjunction with medical and nursing staff training. However, further studies of larger patient samples should be performed.","PeriodicalId":34911,"journal":{"name":"Professioni infermieristiche","volume":"74 4 1","pages":"241-247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The professional skills of the nurse involved in the care of individuals with sexually transmitted infections].\",\"authors\":\"B. Suligoi, A. Luzi, M. Salfa, Giuseppe Esposito\",\"doi\":\"10.7429/pi.2021.744241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION Accurate pain assessment and management in critically ill patients withcognitive alterations who are unable to communicate constitute a major challenge for themedical and nursing staff of Intensive Care Units (ICUs). This study want assess the impact of Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CCPOT) scale in ICU practice and evaluate the effects on pain assessment and management in brain-injured critically ill adult patients. METHODS This before-and-after study was carried out in an Italian ICU, where data were collected before (T0) and after (T1) implementation of the CCPOT in brain-injured critically ill adults. RESULTS The study population consisted of 81 patients (35 before and 46 after intervention). The use of propofol fell significantly (propofol: t(80) = 1.83) and at the same time the use of morphine increase significantly (morphine: t(80) = 1.51) after intervention.Analysis of the data with respect to pain relief and prevention during some nursing care activities revealed a significant increase in the use of fentanyl citrate (x2(1)= 4.04, p =.04) and paracetamol (x2(1)= 5.30, p =.02). Pain management was in line with the protocol, which envisaged administration of pain medications to patients with CCPOT scores > 3 in 76.8% of cases. CONCLUSION The present findings strongly support the value of the CCPOT scale in managing ICU patient pain in conjunction with medical and nursing staff training. However, further studies of larger patient samples should be performed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Professioni infermieristiche\",\"volume\":\"74 4 1\",\"pages\":\"241-247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Professioni infermieristiche\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7429/pi.2021.744241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professioni infermieristiche","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7429/pi.2021.744241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对认知改变且无法沟通的危重患者进行准确的疼痛评估和管理是重症监护病房(icu)医护人员面临的主要挑战。本研究旨在评估重症监护疼痛观察工具(CCPOT)量表在ICU实践中的作用,并评估其对脑损伤成人危重患者疼痛评估和管理的影响。方法在意大利一家ICU进行了前后对比研究,收集了脑损伤危重症成人实施CCPOT前(T0)和后(T1)的数据。结果81例患者(干预前35例,干预后46例)。干预后异丙酚的使用明显下降(异丙酚:t(80) = 1.83),同时吗啡的使用明显增加(吗啡:t(80) = 1.51)。对部分护理活动中缓解和预防疼痛的数据进行分析,发现枸橼酸芬太尼(x2(1)= 4.04, p =.04)和扑热息痛(x2(1)= 5.30, p =.02)的使用显著增加。疼痛管理与方案一致,76.8%的CCPOT评分为bb0 - 3的患者设想给予止痛药治疗。结论本研究结果有力地支持CCPOT量表在管理ICU患者疼痛以及医护人员培训方面的价值。然而,应该对更大的患者样本进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[The professional skills of the nurse involved in the care of individuals with sexually transmitted infections].
INTRODUCTION Accurate pain assessment and management in critically ill patients withcognitive alterations who are unable to communicate constitute a major challenge for themedical and nursing staff of Intensive Care Units (ICUs). This study want assess the impact of Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CCPOT) scale in ICU practice and evaluate the effects on pain assessment and management in brain-injured critically ill adult patients. METHODS This before-and-after study was carried out in an Italian ICU, where data were collected before (T0) and after (T1) implementation of the CCPOT in brain-injured critically ill adults. RESULTS The study population consisted of 81 patients (35 before and 46 after intervention). The use of propofol fell significantly (propofol: t(80) = 1.83) and at the same time the use of morphine increase significantly (morphine: t(80) = 1.51) after intervention.Analysis of the data with respect to pain relief and prevention during some nursing care activities revealed a significant increase in the use of fentanyl citrate (x2(1)= 4.04, p =.04) and paracetamol (x2(1)= 5.30, p =.02). Pain management was in line with the protocol, which envisaged administration of pain medications to patients with CCPOT scores > 3 in 76.8% of cases. CONCLUSION The present findings strongly support the value of the CCPOT scale in managing ICU patient pain in conjunction with medical and nursing staff training. However, further studies of larger patient samples should be performed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Professioni infermieristiche
Professioni infermieristiche Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Professioni Infermieristiche pubblica, previa approvazione del Comitato di Redazione (CdR), articoli relativi alle diverse funzioni ed ambiti della professione infermieristica e ostetrica.
期刊最新文献
Quality of life, Stress, and Burnout of Italian nurses during the outbreak of COVID-19: a cross-sectional study Cinism, differentiated federal autonomy and sustainability of health services. Nursing competence in continuous renal replacement therapy: development and validation of a measurement tool. Mapping the literature on Digital and Technological Solutions in nursing: a scoping review protocol. [Relation between sleep deprivation and nursing errors during the night shift].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1