玻璃纤维增强聚合物和钢筋加固混凝土梁的受弯性能

IF 1.4 4区 工程技术 Revista de la Construccion Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.7764/rdlc.21.3.506
Cristian Farías, Sarah Pessi, Augusto Wanderlind, Jorge Henrique Piva, Elaine Pavei
{"title":"玻璃纤维增强聚合物和钢筋加固混凝土梁的受弯性能","authors":"Cristian Farías, Sarah Pessi, Augusto Wanderlind, Jorge Henrique Piva, Elaine Pavei","doi":"10.7764/rdlc.21.3.506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, a comparative experimental analysis is performed between steel-reinforced concrete beams, which are dimensioned based on NBR 6118 (2014), and beams reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) rebar, which are dimensioned based on ACI 440.1R (2015) after being subjected to a four-point bending test. The beams are dimensioned to resist the same force and to satisfy the service limit state (SLS). Results show that the two groups of beams exhibit similar vertical displacement behaviors until the SLS-DEF, whereas the GFRP beams exhibit larger deflections. At the ultimate load, the beams with fiberglass bars indicate a higher resistance by approximately 64% compared with those with metal bars.","PeriodicalId":54473,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Construccion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flexural behavior of concrete beams reinforced with glass fiber reinforced polymer and steel bars\",\"authors\":\"Cristian Farías, Sarah Pessi, Augusto Wanderlind, Jorge Henrique Piva, Elaine Pavei\",\"doi\":\"10.7764/rdlc.21.3.506\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, a comparative experimental analysis is performed between steel-reinforced concrete beams, which are dimensioned based on NBR 6118 (2014), and beams reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) rebar, which are dimensioned based on ACI 440.1R (2015) after being subjected to a four-point bending test. The beams are dimensioned to resist the same force and to satisfy the service limit state (SLS). Results show that the two groups of beams exhibit similar vertical displacement behaviors until the SLS-DEF, whereas the GFRP beams exhibit larger deflections. At the ultimate load, the beams with fiberglass bars indicate a higher resistance by approximately 64% compared with those with metal bars.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de la Construccion\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de la Construccion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7764/rdlc.21.3.506\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Construccion","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7764/rdlc.21.3.506","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究对基于NBR 6118(2014)尺寸的钢筋混凝土梁与基于ACI 440.1R(2015)尺寸的玻璃纤维增强聚合物(GFRP)钢筋加固梁进行了四点弯曲试验对比试验分析。梁的尺寸是为了抵抗相同的力,并满足使用极限状态(SLS)。结果表明,在SLS-DEF之前,两组梁的竖向位移行为相似,而GFRP梁的挠度更大。在极限荷载下,带有玻璃纤维杆的梁的阻力比带有金属杆的梁高约64%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Flexural behavior of concrete beams reinforced with glass fiber reinforced polymer and steel bars
In this study, a comparative experimental analysis is performed between steel-reinforced concrete beams, which are dimensioned based on NBR 6118 (2014), and beams reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) rebar, which are dimensioned based on ACI 440.1R (2015) after being subjected to a four-point bending test. The beams are dimensioned to resist the same force and to satisfy the service limit state (SLS). Results show that the two groups of beams exhibit similar vertical displacement behaviors until the SLS-DEF, whereas the GFRP beams exhibit larger deflections. At the ultimate load, the beams with fiberglass bars indicate a higher resistance by approximately 64% compared with those with metal bars.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de la Construccion
Revista de la Construccion 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
21.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Construction is aimed at professionals, constructors, academics, researchers, companies, architects, engineers, and anyone who wishes to expand and update their knowledge about construction. We therefore invite all researchers, academics, and professionals to send their contributions for assessment and possible publication in this journal. The publications are free of publication charges. OBJECTIVES The objectives of the Journal of Construction are: 1. To disseminate new knowledge in all areas related to construction (Building, Civil Works, Materials, Business, Education, etc.). 2. To provide professionals in the area with material for discussion to refresh and update their knowledge. 3. To disseminate new applied technologies in construction nationally and internationally. 4. To provide national and foreign academics with an internationally endorsed medium in which to share their knowledge and debate the topics raised.
期刊最新文献
Durability of concrete exposed to combined freeze-thaw, sulfate, and acid attacks after two years Effect of different ashes from biomass olive pomace on the mechanical and fire properties of gypsum-based materials Incorporating vegetal fibers for sustainable sandy soil Eco-efficient analysis of thermal regulations applied to thermal envelopes of a dwelling in Chile Durability performance of alkali-activated concretes exposed to sulfuric acid attack
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1