21世纪的生物多样性:超越物种计数

IF 0.4 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Metode Science Studies Journal Pub Date : 2018-07-27 DOI:10.7203/metode.9.11186
Cristina Llopis-Belenguer, Isabel Blasco-Costa, J. Balbuena
{"title":"21世纪的生物多样性:超越物种计数","authors":"Cristina Llopis-Belenguer, Isabel Blasco-Costa, J. Balbuena","doi":"10.7203/metode.9.11186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In\nmodern ecology, the traditional diversity indexes (usually of\nrichness, abundance, and species evenness) have been highly revealing\nand useful for monitoring community and ecosystem processes. However,\naround two decades ago, a pioneering research team noticed that these\nindexes did not completely resolve their open questions. Thus, they\nsuggested changing the way biodiversity was measured. At its base,\nthis new methodology considers the distance between species\n(in phylogenetic or functional terms) before subsequently applying the\nappropriate biodiversity indexes. Including phylogenetic and\nfunctional elements in the evaluation of diversity allows us to\napproach the concept of biodiversity in a more comprehensive\nway. ","PeriodicalId":41648,"journal":{"name":"Metode Science Studies Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biodiversidad en el\\nSiglo XXI: más allá del conteo de\\nespecies\",\"authors\":\"Cristina Llopis-Belenguer, Isabel Blasco-Costa, J. Balbuena\",\"doi\":\"10.7203/metode.9.11186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In\\nmodern ecology, the traditional diversity indexes (usually of\\nrichness, abundance, and species evenness) have been highly revealing\\nand useful for monitoring community and ecosystem processes. However,\\naround two decades ago, a pioneering research team noticed that these\\nindexes did not completely resolve their open questions. Thus, they\\nsuggested changing the way biodiversity was measured. At its base,\\nthis new methodology considers the distance between species\\n(in phylogenetic or functional terms) before subsequently applying the\\nappropriate biodiversity indexes. Including phylogenetic and\\nfunctional elements in the evaluation of diversity allows us to\\napproach the concept of biodiversity in a more comprehensive\\nway. \",\"PeriodicalId\":41648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metode Science Studies Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metode Science Studies Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.9.11186\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metode Science Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.9.11186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在现代生态学中,传统的多样性指数(通常是丰富度、丰度和物种均匀度)在监测群落和生态系统过程中具有很高的揭示性和实用性。然而,大约20年前,一个开创性的研究小组注意到,这些指数并没有完全解决他们的开放性问题。因此,他们建议改变测量生物多样性的方法。在其基础上,这种新方法在随后应用适当的生物多样性指数之前考虑物种之间的距离(在系统发育或功能方面)。将系统发育因素和功能因素纳入多样性评价,使我们能够更全面地理解生物多样性的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Biodiversidad en el Siglo XXI: más allá del conteo de especies
In modern ecology, the traditional diversity indexes (usually of richness, abundance, and species evenness) have been highly revealing and useful for monitoring community and ecosystem processes. However, around two decades ago, a pioneering research team noticed that these indexes did not completely resolve their open questions. Thus, they suggested changing the way biodiversity was measured. At its base, this new methodology considers the distance between species (in phylogenetic or functional terms) before subsequently applying the appropriate biodiversity indexes. Including phylogenetic and functional elements in the evaluation of diversity allows us to approach the concept of biodiversity in a more comprehensive way. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Metode Science Studies Journal
Metode Science Studies Journal HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
MORE BIODIVERSITY TO IMPROVE OUR HEALTH The benefits to human well-being of favouring functional and diverse ecosystems Citizen consultations on science communication: A citizen science approach The plants of the future. Genome editing in biotechnology Standards. The building blocks of complexity Good to eat. Food and health at a time of information overload
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1