学术界的歧视与知识分子声望的文化生产

A. Acorn
{"title":"学术界的歧视与知识分子声望的文化生产","authors":"A. Acorn","doi":"10.7939/R3125QQ58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this Article, Annalise Acorn examines the unique features of discrimination against women in academia, a work-place that is primarily concerned with the cultural production of intellectual cachet and scholarly authority. Acorn argues that one's scholarly authority is an end product of collaboration by all members of academia, students, and colleagues alike, who make deeply private and at times arbitrary choices whether to withhold or extend participation and assistance in the creation of the intellectual aura. Acorn then ex-plores ways in which this collective practice of the creation of intellectual cachet works to discriminate against women in academia.","PeriodicalId":83388,"journal":{"name":"UCLA women's law journal","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discrimination in Academia and the Cultural Production of Intellectual Cachet\",\"authors\":\"A. Acorn\",\"doi\":\"10.7939/R3125QQ58\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this Article, Annalise Acorn examines the unique features of discrimination against women in academia, a work-place that is primarily concerned with the cultural production of intellectual cachet and scholarly authority. Acorn argues that one's scholarly authority is an end product of collaboration by all members of academia, students, and colleagues alike, who make deeply private and at times arbitrary choices whether to withhold or extend participation and assistance in the creation of the intellectual aura. Acorn then ex-plores ways in which this collective practice of the creation of intellectual cachet works to discriminate against women in academia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UCLA women's law journal\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UCLA women's law journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7939/R3125QQ58\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UCLA women's law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7939/R3125QQ58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在这篇文章中,Annalise Acorn研究了学术界对女性歧视的独特特征,这是一个主要关注知识分子声望和学术权威的文化生产的工作场所。Acorn认为,一个人的学术权威是学术界所有成员合作的最终产物,包括学生和同事,他们做出了非常私人的、有时是武断的选择,是保留还是扩大参与和帮助创造知识氛围。然后,Acorn探讨了这种创造知识分子声望的集体实践是如何歧视学术界女性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Discrimination in Academia and the Cultural Production of Intellectual Cachet
In this Article, Annalise Acorn examines the unique features of discrimination against women in academia, a work-place that is primarily concerned with the cultural production of intellectual cachet and scholarly authority. Acorn argues that one's scholarly authority is an end product of collaboration by all members of academia, students, and colleagues alike, who make deeply private and at times arbitrary choices whether to withhold or extend participation and assistance in the creation of the intellectual aura. Acorn then ex-plores ways in which this collective practice of the creation of intellectual cachet works to discriminate against women in academia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What's Love Got to Do with It? Anti-Love Jihad Laws and the Othering of Muslims in India Self-Defense, Responsibility, and Punishment: Rethinking the Criminalization of Women Who Kill Their Abusive Intimate Partners Stolen Voices: A Linguistic Approach to Understanding Implicit Gender Bias in the Legal Profession Limitations of Current Menstrual Equity Advocacy and a Path Towards Justice Black Women Victims of Police Brutality and the Silencing of Their Stories
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1