“没有什么本身就是现实”。Thomas Luckmann, Hans-Georg Soeffner和Georg Vobruba之间的对话

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Digithum Pub Date : 2016-05-01 DOI:10.7238/D.V0I18.2951
T. Luckmann, Hans-Georg Soeffner, G. Vobruba
{"title":"“没有什么本身就是现实”。Thomas Luckmann, Hans-Georg Soeffner和Georg Vobruba之间的对话","authors":"T. Luckmann, Hans-Georg Soeffner, G. Vobruba","doi":"10.7238/D.V0I18.2951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thomas Luckmann and Hans-Georg Soeffner never shared a direct teacher-scholar-relationship. But both represent a sociological approach, rooted in phenomenology, and both treat everyday life, Religion and knowledge (among others) as their research subjects. In contrast my interests focus on political and economic problems, on European integration, social security and things like that. We found a broad common ground for our debate anyway, much more than we are able to document in this protocol. Perhaps this is because we tacitly agree in the following: In order to explain the development of institutions, one has to understand the way people act. And in order to understand peoples’ actions one has to observe how people observe social reality.  But perhaps another thing matters as well. It quickly turned out that we three are heavily inclined to irony and – yes – nonsense. Thus, to me the debate with Thomas Luckmann and Hans-Georg Soeffner was impressive and fun. I really hope the protocol reveals this.","PeriodicalId":51964,"journal":{"name":"Digithum","volume":"1 1","pages":"44-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"«Nothing is reality in itself». A conversation between Thomas Luckmann, Hans-Georg Soeffner and Georg Vobruba\",\"authors\":\"T. Luckmann, Hans-Georg Soeffner, G. Vobruba\",\"doi\":\"10.7238/D.V0I18.2951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Thomas Luckmann and Hans-Georg Soeffner never shared a direct teacher-scholar-relationship. But both represent a sociological approach, rooted in phenomenology, and both treat everyday life, Religion and knowledge (among others) as their research subjects. In contrast my interests focus on political and economic problems, on European integration, social security and things like that. We found a broad common ground for our debate anyway, much more than we are able to document in this protocol. Perhaps this is because we tacitly agree in the following: In order to explain the development of institutions, one has to understand the way people act. And in order to understand peoples’ actions one has to observe how people observe social reality.  But perhaps another thing matters as well. It quickly turned out that we three are heavily inclined to irony and – yes – nonsense. Thus, to me the debate with Thomas Luckmann and Hans-Georg Soeffner was impressive and fun. I really hope the protocol reveals this.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digithum\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"44-45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digithum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7238/D.V0I18.2951\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digithum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7238/D.V0I18.2951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

Thomas Luckmann和Hans-Georg Soeffner从来没有直接的老师-学者关系。但两者都代表了一种根植于现象学的社会学方法,都把日常生活、宗教和知识(以及其他)作为他们的研究对象。相比之下,我的兴趣集中在政治和经济问题上,比如欧洲一体化、社会保障等。无论如何,我们为我们的辩论找到了广泛的共同点,远远超过了我们在本协议中所能记录的。也许这是因为我们在以下方面达成了默契:为了解释制度的发展,我们必须理解人们的行为方式。为了理解人们的行为,我们必须观察人们如何观察社会现实。但也许另一件事也很重要。事实很快证明,我们三个人都非常倾向于讽刺和——是的——胡说八道。因此,对我来说,与Thomas Luckmann和Hans-Georg Soeffner的辩论令人印象深刻,也很有趣。我真希望协议能说明这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
«Nothing is reality in itself». A conversation between Thomas Luckmann, Hans-Georg Soeffner and Georg Vobruba
Thomas Luckmann and Hans-Georg Soeffner never shared a direct teacher-scholar-relationship. But both represent a sociological approach, rooted in phenomenology, and both treat everyday life, Religion and knowledge (among others) as their research subjects. In contrast my interests focus on political and economic problems, on European integration, social security and things like that. We found a broad common ground for our debate anyway, much more than we are able to document in this protocol. Perhaps this is because we tacitly agree in the following: In order to explain the development of institutions, one has to understand the way people act. And in order to understand peoples’ actions one has to observe how people observe social reality.  But perhaps another thing matters as well. It quickly turned out that we three are heavily inclined to irony and – yes – nonsense. Thus, to me the debate with Thomas Luckmann and Hans-Georg Soeffner was impressive and fun. I really hope the protocol reveals this.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digithum
Digithum HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Digithum applies a relational perspective in the analysis of processes of inclusion and social exclusion, subjective experiences, social ties, cultural heritage and cultural production and consumption.
期刊最新文献
De la precariedad económica a la vulnerabilidad existencial. Notas para una ampliación de paradigma The Third (included) in the interdependence between the human and the social The effects of work. A Simmelian view of delivery platforms Das Geistesleben unter die großstädte: the socio-affective order in the subway from a Simmelian perspective Simmelian Contributions to a Relational Sociology of Senses and Emotions: the Case of “Platforms of Delivery Workers”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1