可解释的机器学习使用围手术期系列实验室结果预测腹膜炎诱导败血症患者的术后死亡率。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-27 DOI:10.4174/astr.2023.105.4.237
Seung Hee Lim, Min Jeong Kim, Won Hyuk Choi, Jin Cheol Cheong, Jong Wan Kim, Kyung Joo Lee, Jun Ho Park
{"title":"可解释的机器学习使用围手术期系列实验室结果预测腹膜炎诱导败血症患者的术后死亡率。","authors":"Seung Hee Lim,&nbsp;Min Jeong Kim,&nbsp;Won Hyuk Choi,&nbsp;Jin Cheol Cheong,&nbsp;Jong Wan Kim,&nbsp;Kyung Joo Lee,&nbsp;Jun Ho Park","doi":"10.4174/astr.2023.105.4.237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Sepsis is one of the most common causes of death after surgery. Several conventional scoring systems have been developed to predict the outcome of sepsis; however, their predictive power is insufficient. The present study applies explainable machine-learning algorithms to improve the accuracy of predicting postoperative mortality in patients with sepsis caused by peritonitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of data from demographic, clinical, and laboratory analyses, including the delta neutrophil index (DNI), WBC and neutrophil counts, and CRP level. Laboratory data were measured before surgery, 12-36 hours after surgery, and 60-84 hours after surgery. The primary study output was the probability of mortality. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of several machine-learning algorithms using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) 3 models were compared. 'SHapley Additive exPlanations' values were used to indicate the direction of the relationship between a variable and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CatBoost model yielded the highest AUC (0.933) for mortality compared to SAPS3 and SOFA (0.860 and 0.867, respectively). Increased DNI on day 3, septic shock, use of norepinephrine therapy, and increased international normalized ratio on day 3 had the greatest impact on the model's prediction of mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine-learning algorithms increase the accuracy of predicting postoperative mortality in patients with sepsis caused by peritonitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10613826/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explainable machine learning using perioperative serial laboratory results to predict postoperative mortality in patients with peritonitis-induced sepsis.\",\"authors\":\"Seung Hee Lim,&nbsp;Min Jeong Kim,&nbsp;Won Hyuk Choi,&nbsp;Jin Cheol Cheong,&nbsp;Jong Wan Kim,&nbsp;Kyung Joo Lee,&nbsp;Jun Ho Park\",\"doi\":\"10.4174/astr.2023.105.4.237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Sepsis is one of the most common causes of death after surgery. Several conventional scoring systems have been developed to predict the outcome of sepsis; however, their predictive power is insufficient. The present study applies explainable machine-learning algorithms to improve the accuracy of predicting postoperative mortality in patients with sepsis caused by peritonitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of data from demographic, clinical, and laboratory analyses, including the delta neutrophil index (DNI), WBC and neutrophil counts, and CRP level. Laboratory data were measured before surgery, 12-36 hours after surgery, and 60-84 hours after surgery. The primary study output was the probability of mortality. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of several machine-learning algorithms using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) 3 models were compared. 'SHapley Additive exPlanations' values were used to indicate the direction of the relationship between a variable and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CatBoost model yielded the highest AUC (0.933) for mortality compared to SAPS3 and SOFA (0.860 and 0.867, respectively). Increased DNI on day 3, septic shock, use of norepinephrine therapy, and increased international normalized ratio on day 3 had the greatest impact on the model's prediction of mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine-learning algorithms increase the accuracy of predicting postoperative mortality in patients with sepsis caused by peritonitis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10613826/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2023.105.4.237\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2023.105.4.237","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:脓毒症是手术后最常见的死亡原因之一。已经开发了几种传统的评分系统来预测败血症的结果;然而,它们的预测能力是不够的。本研究应用可解释的机器学习算法来提高腹膜炎引起败血症患者术后死亡率的预测准确性。方法:我们对人口统计学、临床和实验室分析的数据进行了回顾性分析,包括德尔塔中性粒细胞指数(DNI)、白细胞和中性粒细胞计数以及CRP水平。在手术前、手术后12-36小时和手术后60-84小时测量实验室数据。主要研究结果是死亡率。比较了使用顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA)和简化急性生理学评分(SAPS)3模型的几种机器学习算法的受试者工作特征曲线下面积SHapley加性exPlanations的值用于指示变量与死亡率之间关系的方向。结果:与SAPS3和SOFA(分别为0.860和0.867)相比,CatBoost模型的死亡率AUC最高(0.933)。第3天DNI的增加、感染性休克、去甲肾上腺素治疗的使用以及第3天国际标准化比率的增加对模型的死亡率预测影响最大。结论:机器学习算法提高了预测腹膜炎引起败血症患者术后死亡率的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Explainable machine learning using perioperative serial laboratory results to predict postoperative mortality in patients with peritonitis-induced sepsis.

Purpose: Sepsis is one of the most common causes of death after surgery. Several conventional scoring systems have been developed to predict the outcome of sepsis; however, their predictive power is insufficient. The present study applies explainable machine-learning algorithms to improve the accuracy of predicting postoperative mortality in patients with sepsis caused by peritonitis.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of data from demographic, clinical, and laboratory analyses, including the delta neutrophil index (DNI), WBC and neutrophil counts, and CRP level. Laboratory data were measured before surgery, 12-36 hours after surgery, and 60-84 hours after surgery. The primary study output was the probability of mortality. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of several machine-learning algorithms using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) 3 models were compared. 'SHapley Additive exPlanations' values were used to indicate the direction of the relationship between a variable and mortality.

Results: The CatBoost model yielded the highest AUC (0.933) for mortality compared to SAPS3 and SOFA (0.860 and 0.867, respectively). Increased DNI on day 3, septic shock, use of norepinephrine therapy, and increased international normalized ratio on day 3 had the greatest impact on the model's prediction of mortality.

Conclusion: Machine-learning algorithms increase the accuracy of predicting postoperative mortality in patients with sepsis caused by peritonitis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Intentions to move abroad among medical students: a cross-sectional study to investigate determinants and opinions. The change process questionnaire (CPQ): A psychometric validation. Prevalence and predictors of hand hygiene compliance in clinical, surgical and intensive care unit wards: results of a second cross-sectional study at the Umberto I teaching hospital of Rome. The prevention of medication errors in the home care setting: a scoping review. Differential Costs of Raising Grandchildren on Older Mother-Adult Child Relations in Black and White Families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1