抗反流粘膜切除术治疗胃食管反流病的两年疗效:一项中国前瞻性队列研究。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Digestive Diseases Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1111/1751-2980.13238
Jun Nan Hu, Song Feng Chen, Xing Yu Jia, Yu Luo, Xiang Bin Xing, Nian Di Tan, Meng Yu Zhang, Qian Jun Zhuang, Jin Hui Wang, Ying Lian Xiao
{"title":"抗反流粘膜切除术治疗胃食管反流病的两年疗效:一项中国前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Jun Nan Hu,&nbsp;Song Feng Chen,&nbsp;Xing Yu Jia,&nbsp;Yu Luo,&nbsp;Xiang Bin Xing,&nbsp;Nian Di Tan,&nbsp;Meng Yu Zhang,&nbsp;Qian Jun Zhuang,&nbsp;Jin Hui Wang,&nbsp;Ying Lian Xiao","doi":"10.1111/1751-2980.13238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) is an emerging and promising endoscopic treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In the current study we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ARMS in treating Chinese GERD patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a single-center prospective cohort study. ARMS was performed in GERD patients by an experienced endoscopist. The patients were required to undergo symptom assessment as well as endoscopic examination, high-resolution manometry (HRM), and impedance-pH monitoring before and after ARMS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twelve patients were enrolled. Follow-up was completed by all patients at 3 and 6 months, 11 patients at 1 year, and 8 patients at 2 years after ARMS, respectively. Symptom improvement was achieved in 66.7%, 75.0%, 72.7%, and 50.0% of the patients at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after ARMS, respectively. Postoperative dysphagia was reported by 25.0%, 25.0%, 27.3%, and 25.0% of patients at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery, none of whom required additional invasive treatment. All patients with preoperative esophagitis healed after ARMS. For impedance-pH monitoring parameters, number of acidic reflux episodes and the proportion of patients with acid exposure time (AET) &gt;4.0% decreased significantly after ARMS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>ARMS was safe and effective in Chinese GERD patients. The efficacy of ARMS was not short-term and remained evident throughout the 2-year follow-up. Further multicenter studies with larger sample sizes are needed to verify our findings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15564,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digestive Diseases","volume":"24 11","pages":"611-618"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two-year outcomes of anti-reflux mucosectomy in treating gastroesophageal reflux disease: A Chinese prospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Jun Nan Hu,&nbsp;Song Feng Chen,&nbsp;Xing Yu Jia,&nbsp;Yu Luo,&nbsp;Xiang Bin Xing,&nbsp;Nian Di Tan,&nbsp;Meng Yu Zhang,&nbsp;Qian Jun Zhuang,&nbsp;Jin Hui Wang,&nbsp;Ying Lian Xiao\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1751-2980.13238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) is an emerging and promising endoscopic treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In the current study we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ARMS in treating Chinese GERD patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This was a single-center prospective cohort study. ARMS was performed in GERD patients by an experienced endoscopist. The patients were required to undergo symptom assessment as well as endoscopic examination, high-resolution manometry (HRM), and impedance-pH monitoring before and after ARMS.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Twelve patients were enrolled. Follow-up was completed by all patients at 3 and 6 months, 11 patients at 1 year, and 8 patients at 2 years after ARMS, respectively. Symptom improvement was achieved in 66.7%, 75.0%, 72.7%, and 50.0% of the patients at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after ARMS, respectively. Postoperative dysphagia was reported by 25.0%, 25.0%, 27.3%, and 25.0% of patients at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery, none of whom required additional invasive treatment. All patients with preoperative esophagitis healed after ARMS. For impedance-pH monitoring parameters, number of acidic reflux episodes and the proportion of patients with acid exposure time (AET) &gt;4.0% decreased significantly after ARMS.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>ARMS was safe and effective in Chinese GERD patients. The efficacy of ARMS was not short-term and remained evident throughout the 2-year follow-up. Further multicenter studies with larger sample sizes are needed to verify our findings.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Digestive Diseases\",\"volume\":\"24 11\",\"pages\":\"611-618\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Digestive Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1751-2980.13238\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digestive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1751-2980.13238","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:抗反流粘膜切除术(ARMS)是一种新兴的、有前途的胃食管反流病(GERD)内镜治疗方法。本研究旨在评估ARMS治疗中国GERD患者的安全性和有效性。方法:这是一项单中心前瞻性队列研究。由经验丰富的内镜医生对入选的GERD患者进行ARMS。这些患者在ARMS前后需要接受症状评估、内窥镜检查、高分辨率测压(HRM)和阻抗pH监测。结果:共有12名患者入选,均在3个月和6个月完成随访,其中11名患者在1年时完成随访,8名患者在2个月时完成随访 ARMS之后的几年。在3个月、6个月、1年、2个月时症状改善的患者比例 ARMS后年分别为66.7%、75.0%、72.7%、50.0%。25.0%、25.0%、27.3%、25.0%的患者在术后3个月、6个月、1年和2个月出现吞咽困难 术后数年,没有一例患者需要额外的侵入性治疗。术前食管炎患者均经ARMS治疗后痊愈。对于阻抗pH监测参数,酸反流发作次数和酸暴露时间(AET)患者比例%> 结论:本研究证明ARMS对中国GERD患者是安全有效的。ARMS的疗效不是短期的,在本研究的2年随访期内仍然明显。进一步的多中心研究和更大的样本量仍然需要验证我们的发现。这篇文章受版权保护。保留所有权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Two-year outcomes of anti-reflux mucosectomy in treating gastroesophageal reflux disease: A Chinese prospective cohort study

Objectives

Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) is an emerging and promising endoscopic treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In the current study we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ARMS in treating Chinese GERD patients.

Methods

This was a single-center prospective cohort study. ARMS was performed in GERD patients by an experienced endoscopist. The patients were required to undergo symptom assessment as well as endoscopic examination, high-resolution manometry (HRM), and impedance-pH monitoring before and after ARMS.

Results

Twelve patients were enrolled. Follow-up was completed by all patients at 3 and 6 months, 11 patients at 1 year, and 8 patients at 2 years after ARMS, respectively. Symptom improvement was achieved in 66.7%, 75.0%, 72.7%, and 50.0% of the patients at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after ARMS, respectively. Postoperative dysphagia was reported by 25.0%, 25.0%, 27.3%, and 25.0% of patients at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery, none of whom required additional invasive treatment. All patients with preoperative esophagitis healed after ARMS. For impedance-pH monitoring parameters, number of acidic reflux episodes and the proportion of patients with acid exposure time (AET) >4.0% decreased significantly after ARMS.

Conclusions

ARMS was safe and effective in Chinese GERD patients. The efficacy of ARMS was not short-term and remained evident throughout the 2-year follow-up. Further multicenter studies with larger sample sizes are needed to verify our findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Digestive Diseases
Journal of Digestive Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Digestive Diseases is the official English-language journal of the Chinese Society of Gastroenterology. The journal is published twelve times per year and includes peer-reviewed original papers, review articles and commentaries concerned with research relating to the esophagus, stomach, small intestine, colon, liver, biliary tract and pancreas.
期刊最新文献
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Affect Post-Progression Survival of Specific Patient Subgroups With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Study Cohorts' Analysis. Ethnic Minority Disparities in the Epidemiology of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in a Representative Area of China. Association of Poor Sleep Quality With Adverse Outcomes in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Climate Sustainability as a Catalyst for Quality and Excellence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Narrative Review. Sarcopenia as a Risk Factor for Mortality in NAFLD: How Should We Diagnose It?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1