思想的多样性:公众对英国不同种族群体基因检测的看法。

IF 2.6 3区 生物学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Journal of Human Genetics Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1038/s10038-023-01199-1
Benjamin H. L. Harris, Caitlin McCabe, Hana Shafique, Simon Lammy, Laura Tookman, James Flanagan, Sofia Miron-Barroso, Mark Lythgoe, James Clark, Jason L. Walsh, Matteo Di Giovannantonio, Jonathan Krell
{"title":"思想的多样性:公众对英国不同种族群体基因检测的看法。","authors":"Benjamin H. L. Harris, Caitlin McCabe, Hana Shafique, Simon Lammy, Laura Tookman, James Flanagan, Sofia Miron-Barroso, Mark Lythgoe, James Clark, Jason L. Walsh, Matteo Di Giovannantonio, Jonathan Krell","doi":"10.1038/s10038-023-01199-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Genetic testing is becoming rapidly more accessible to the general populous either through or outside healthcare systems. Few large-scale studies have been carried out to gauge public opinion in this growing area. Here, we undertook the largest cross-sectional study on genetic testing in the UK. The primary purpose of this study is to identify the differences in attitudes toward genetic testing across ethnic groups. A cohort of 6500 individuals from a diverse population completed a 72-item survey in a cross-sectional study. Responses between ethnic minority and white individuals in the UK were compared using a wilcoxon rank-sum and chi-square tests. The white cohort was approximately twice as likely to have taken a genetic test and 13% more had heard about genetic testing before the survey. The ethnic minority cohort appeared more apprehensive about the impact of genetic testing on employability. This study highlights that in the UK, significant differences in opinions regarding genetic testing exist between white individuals and ethnic minority individuals. There is an urgent need to develop more inclusive strategies to equally inform individuals from all backgrounds to avoid disparities in the utilisation of genetic testing.","PeriodicalId":16077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Genetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s10038-023-01199-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diversity of thought: public perceptions of genetic testing across ethnic groups in the UK\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin H. L. Harris, Caitlin McCabe, Hana Shafique, Simon Lammy, Laura Tookman, James Flanagan, Sofia Miron-Barroso, Mark Lythgoe, James Clark, Jason L. Walsh, Matteo Di Giovannantonio, Jonathan Krell\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s10038-023-01199-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Genetic testing is becoming rapidly more accessible to the general populous either through or outside healthcare systems. Few large-scale studies have been carried out to gauge public opinion in this growing area. Here, we undertook the largest cross-sectional study on genetic testing in the UK. The primary purpose of this study is to identify the differences in attitudes toward genetic testing across ethnic groups. A cohort of 6500 individuals from a diverse population completed a 72-item survey in a cross-sectional study. Responses between ethnic minority and white individuals in the UK were compared using a wilcoxon rank-sum and chi-square tests. The white cohort was approximately twice as likely to have taken a genetic test and 13% more had heard about genetic testing before the survey. The ethnic minority cohort appeared more apprehensive about the impact of genetic testing on employability. This study highlights that in the UK, significant differences in opinions regarding genetic testing exist between white individuals and ethnic minority individuals. There is an urgent need to develop more inclusive strategies to equally inform individuals from all backgrounds to avoid disparities in the utilisation of genetic testing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Genetics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s10038-023-01199-1.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s10038-023-01199-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s10038-023-01199-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无论是通过医疗保健系统还是在医疗保健系统之外,普通人群都能迅速获得基因检测。在这个日益增长的地区,很少进行大规模的研究来衡量公众舆论。在这里,我们进行了英国最大规模的基因检测横断面研究。这项研究的主要目的是确定不同种族对基因检测的态度差异。来自不同人群的6500人在一项横断面研究中完成了一项72项调查。使用wilcoxon秩和和和卡方检验比较了英国少数民族和白人的反应。白人群体进行基因检测的可能性大约是白人群体的两倍,在调查之前听说过基因检测的人数增加了13%。少数族裔群体似乎更担心基因检测对就业能力的影响。这项研究强调,在英国,白人和少数民族在基因检测方面存在显著差异。迫切需要制定更具包容性的战略,平等地向来自各种背景的个人提供信息,以避免基因检测利用方面的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diversity of thought: public perceptions of genetic testing across ethnic groups in the UK
Genetic testing is becoming rapidly more accessible to the general populous either through or outside healthcare systems. Few large-scale studies have been carried out to gauge public opinion in this growing area. Here, we undertook the largest cross-sectional study on genetic testing in the UK. The primary purpose of this study is to identify the differences in attitudes toward genetic testing across ethnic groups. A cohort of 6500 individuals from a diverse population completed a 72-item survey in a cross-sectional study. Responses between ethnic minority and white individuals in the UK were compared using a wilcoxon rank-sum and chi-square tests. The white cohort was approximately twice as likely to have taken a genetic test and 13% more had heard about genetic testing before the survey. The ethnic minority cohort appeared more apprehensive about the impact of genetic testing on employability. This study highlights that in the UK, significant differences in opinions regarding genetic testing exist between white individuals and ethnic minority individuals. There is an urgent need to develop more inclusive strategies to equally inform individuals from all backgrounds to avoid disparities in the utilisation of genetic testing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Human Genetics
Journal of Human Genetics 生物-遗传学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
101
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Human Genetics is an international journal publishing articles on human genetics, including medical genetics and human genome analysis. It covers all aspects of human genetics, including molecular genetics, clinical genetics, behavioral genetics, immunogenetics, pharmacogenomics, population genetics, functional genomics, epigenetics, genetic counseling and gene therapy. Articles on the following areas are especially welcome: genetic factors of monogenic and complex disorders, genome-wide association studies, genetic epidemiology, cancer genetics, personal genomics, genotype-phenotype relationships and genome diversity.
期刊最新文献
Novel homozygous ESAM variants in two families with perinatal strokes showing variable neuroradiologic and clinical findings. Biallelic missense CEP55 variants cause prenatal MARCH syndrome. Two-hit mutation causes Wilms tumor in an individual with FBXW7-related neurodevelopmental syndrome. Genetic analysis of a Yayoi individual from the Doigahama site provides insights into the origins of immigrants to the Japanese Archipelago. Development of a method for the imputation of the multi-allelic serotonin-transporter-linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR) in the Japanese population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1