冠状动脉CT血管造影衍生的血流储备分数对糖尿病和非糖尿病患者下游管理和临床结果的影响。

IF 3.8 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging Pub Date : 2023-10-19 eCollection Date: 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1148/ryct.220276
Gaurav S Gulsin, Georgios Tzimas, Kenneth-Royce Holmes, Hidenobu Takagi, Stephanie L Sellers, Philipp Blanke, Lynne M H Koweek, Bjarne L Nørgaard, Jesper Jensen, Mark G Rabbat, Gianluca Pontone, Timothy A Fairbairn, Kavitha M Chinnaiyan, Pamela S Douglas, Whitney Huey, Hitoshi Matsuo, Niels P R Sand, Koen Nieman, Jeroen J Bax, Tetsuya Amano, Tomohiro Kawasaki, Takashi Akasaka, Campbell Rogers, Daniel S Berman, Manesh R Patel, Bernard De Bruyne, Sarah Mullen, Jonathon A Leipsic
{"title":"冠状动脉CT血管造影衍生的血流储备分数对糖尿病和非糖尿病患者下游管理和临床结果的影响。","authors":"Gaurav S Gulsin, Georgios Tzimas, Kenneth-Royce Holmes, Hidenobu Takagi, Stephanie L Sellers, Philipp Blanke, Lynne M H Koweek, Bjarne L Nørgaard, Jesper Jensen, Mark G Rabbat, Gianluca Pontone, Timothy A Fairbairn, Kavitha M Chinnaiyan, Pamela S Douglas, Whitney Huey, Hitoshi Matsuo, Niels P R Sand, Koen Nieman, Jeroen J Bax, Tetsuya Amano, Tomohiro Kawasaki, Takashi Akasaka, Campbell Rogers, Daniel S Berman, Manesh R Patel, Bernard De Bruyne, Sarah Mullen, Jonathon A Leipsic","doi":"10.1148/ryct.220276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the clinical use of coronary CT angiography (CCTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) in individuals with and without diabetes mellitus (DM).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This secondary analysis included participants (enrolled July 2015 to October 2017) from the prospective, multicenter, international The Assessing Diagnostic Value of Noninvasive CT-FFR in Coronary Care (ADVANCE) registry (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02499679) who were evaluated for suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), with one or more coronary stenosis ≥30% on CCTA images, using CT-FFR. CCTA and CT-FFR findings, treatment strategies at 90 days, and clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up were compared in participants with and without DM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 4290 participants (mean age, 66 years ± 10 [SD]; 66% male participants; 22% participants with DM). Participants with DM had more obstructive CAD (one or more coronary stenosis ≥50%; 78.8% vs 70.6%, <i>P</i> < .001), multivessel CAD (three-vessel obstructive CAD; 18.9% vs 11.2%, <i>P</i> < .001), and proportionally more vessels with CT-FFR ≤ 0.8 (74.3% vs 64.6%, <i>P</i> < .001). Treatment reclassification by CT-FFR occurred in two-thirds of participants which was consistent regardless of the presence of DM. There was a similar graded increase in coronary revascularization with declining CT-FFR in both groups. At 1 year, presence of DM was associated with higher rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% CI: 1.2, 4.1; <i>P</i> = .01). However, no between group differences were observed when stratified by stenosis severity (<50% or ≥50%) or CT-FFR positivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both anatomic CCTA findings and CT-FFR demonstrated a more complex pattern of CAD in participants with versus without DM. Rates of treatment reclassification were similar regardless of the presence of DM, and DM was not an adverse prognostic indicator when adjusted for diameter stenosis and CT-FFR.Clinical trial registration no. NCT 02499679<b>Keywords:</b> Fractional Flow Reserve, CT Angiography, Diabetes Mellitus, Coronary Artery Disease <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> See also the commentary by Ghoshhajra in this issue.© RSNA, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":21168,"journal":{"name":"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging","volume":"5 5","pages":"e220276"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10613926/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Coronary CT Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve on Downstream Management and Clinical Outcomes in Individuals with and without Diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Gaurav S Gulsin, Georgios Tzimas, Kenneth-Royce Holmes, Hidenobu Takagi, Stephanie L Sellers, Philipp Blanke, Lynne M H Koweek, Bjarne L Nørgaard, Jesper Jensen, Mark G Rabbat, Gianluca Pontone, Timothy A Fairbairn, Kavitha M Chinnaiyan, Pamela S Douglas, Whitney Huey, Hitoshi Matsuo, Niels P R Sand, Koen Nieman, Jeroen J Bax, Tetsuya Amano, Tomohiro Kawasaki, Takashi Akasaka, Campbell Rogers, Daniel S Berman, Manesh R Patel, Bernard De Bruyne, Sarah Mullen, Jonathon A Leipsic\",\"doi\":\"10.1148/ryct.220276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the clinical use of coronary CT angiography (CCTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) in individuals with and without diabetes mellitus (DM).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This secondary analysis included participants (enrolled July 2015 to October 2017) from the prospective, multicenter, international The Assessing Diagnostic Value of Noninvasive CT-FFR in Coronary Care (ADVANCE) registry (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02499679) who were evaluated for suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), with one or more coronary stenosis ≥30% on CCTA images, using CT-FFR. CCTA and CT-FFR findings, treatment strategies at 90 days, and clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up were compared in participants with and without DM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 4290 participants (mean age, 66 years ± 10 [SD]; 66% male participants; 22% participants with DM). Participants with DM had more obstructive CAD (one or more coronary stenosis ≥50%; 78.8% vs 70.6%, <i>P</i> < .001), multivessel CAD (three-vessel obstructive CAD; 18.9% vs 11.2%, <i>P</i> < .001), and proportionally more vessels with CT-FFR ≤ 0.8 (74.3% vs 64.6%, <i>P</i> < .001). Treatment reclassification by CT-FFR occurred in two-thirds of participants which was consistent regardless of the presence of DM. There was a similar graded increase in coronary revascularization with declining CT-FFR in both groups. At 1 year, presence of DM was associated with higher rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% CI: 1.2, 4.1; <i>P</i> = .01). However, no between group differences were observed when stratified by stenosis severity (<50% or ≥50%) or CT-FFR positivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both anatomic CCTA findings and CT-FFR demonstrated a more complex pattern of CAD in participants with versus without DM. Rates of treatment reclassification were similar regardless of the presence of DM, and DM was not an adverse prognostic indicator when adjusted for diameter stenosis and CT-FFR.Clinical trial registration no. NCT 02499679<b>Keywords:</b> Fractional Flow Reserve, CT Angiography, Diabetes Mellitus, Coronary Artery Disease <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> See also the commentary by Ghoshhajra in this issue.© RSNA, 2023.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging\",\"volume\":\"5 5\",\"pages\":\"e220276\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10613926/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryct.220276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryct.220276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较冠状动脉CT血管造影术(CCTA)衍生的血流储备分数(FFR)在糖尿病(DM)患者和非糖尿病患者中的临床应用。材料和方法:该二次分析包括来自前瞻性、多中心、,国际无创CT-FFR在冠状动脉护理(ADVANCE)注册中心(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符,NCT02499679)的诊断价值评估,这些患者使用CT-FFR评估疑似冠状动脉疾病(CAD),CCTA图像上有一个或多个冠状动脉狭窄≥30%。比较了糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的CCTA和CT-FFR结果、90天的治疗策略以及1年随访的临床结果。结果:该研究包括4290名参与者(平均年龄,66岁±10[SD];66%的男性参与者;22%的糖尿病参与者)。患有糖尿病的参与者有更多的阻塞性CAD(一个或多个冠状动脉狭窄≥50%;78.8%vs 70.6%,P<.001)、多支血管CAD(三支血管阻塞性CAD;18.9%vs 11.2%,P<.001),并且CT-FFR≤0.8的血管按比例增加(74.3%vs 64.6%,P<.001)。三分之二的参与者通过CT-FFR进行治疗重新分类,无论是否存在糖尿病,这都是一致的。两组冠状动脉血运重建的增加程度与CT-FFR的下降程度相似。1年时,糖尿病的存在与更高的主要心血管不良事件发生率相关(危险比,2.2;95%可信区间:1.2,4.1;P=0.01)。然而,根据狭窄严重程度进行分层时,没有观察到组间差异(结论:解剖CCTA结果和CT-FFR均显示,糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者的CAD模式更复杂。无论是否存在糖尿病,治疗的重新分类率都是相似的,并且当根据直径狭窄和CT-FFR进行调整时,糖尿病不是一个不良预后指标。临床试验注册号:NCT 02499679关键词:血流储备分数、CT血管造影、糖尿病、冠状动脉疾病补充材料可用于本文。另见本期Ghoshhajra的评论。©RSNA,2023年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Coronary CT Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve on Downstream Management and Clinical Outcomes in Individuals with and without Diabetes.

Purpose: To compare the clinical use of coronary CT angiography (CCTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) in individuals with and without diabetes mellitus (DM).

Materials and methods: This secondary analysis included participants (enrolled July 2015 to October 2017) from the prospective, multicenter, international The Assessing Diagnostic Value of Noninvasive CT-FFR in Coronary Care (ADVANCE) registry (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02499679) who were evaluated for suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), with one or more coronary stenosis ≥30% on CCTA images, using CT-FFR. CCTA and CT-FFR findings, treatment strategies at 90 days, and clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up were compared in participants with and without DM.

Results: The study included 4290 participants (mean age, 66 years ± 10 [SD]; 66% male participants; 22% participants with DM). Participants with DM had more obstructive CAD (one or more coronary stenosis ≥50%; 78.8% vs 70.6%, P < .001), multivessel CAD (three-vessel obstructive CAD; 18.9% vs 11.2%, P < .001), and proportionally more vessels with CT-FFR ≤ 0.8 (74.3% vs 64.6%, P < .001). Treatment reclassification by CT-FFR occurred in two-thirds of participants which was consistent regardless of the presence of DM. There was a similar graded increase in coronary revascularization with declining CT-FFR in both groups. At 1 year, presence of DM was associated with higher rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% CI: 1.2, 4.1; P = .01). However, no between group differences were observed when stratified by stenosis severity (<50% or ≥50%) or CT-FFR positivity.

Conclusion: Both anatomic CCTA findings and CT-FFR demonstrated a more complex pattern of CAD in participants with versus without DM. Rates of treatment reclassification were similar regardless of the presence of DM, and DM was not an adverse prognostic indicator when adjusted for diameter stenosis and CT-FFR.Clinical trial registration no. NCT 02499679Keywords: Fractional Flow Reserve, CT Angiography, Diabetes Mellitus, Coronary Artery Disease Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the commentary by Ghoshhajra in this issue.© RSNA, 2023.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
1.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Accelerated Cardiac MRI with Deep Learning-based Image Reconstruction for Cine Imaging. Diagnostic Performance of AI-enabled Plaque Quantification from Coronary CT Angiography Compared with Intravascular Ultrasound. Cardiac MRI Pectoralis Muscle Thickness as a Measure of Sarcopenia: Prognostic Significance, Interreader Agreement, and Physiologic Correlation. Association of Aortic Stiffness with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: New Insights into the Ventriculoarterial Connection. Severe Quadricuspid Pulmonary Valve Stenosis Presenting as Scrotal Edema.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1