创伤风险评估工具在老年车祸患者中的诊断准确性。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal for Healthcare Quality Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-18 DOI:10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000402
Oluwaseun John Adeyemi, Kester Gibbons, Luke B Schwartz, Ariana T Meltzer-Bruhn, Garrett W Esper, Corita Grudzen, Charles DiMaggio, Joshua Chodosh, Kenneth A Egol, Sanjit R Konda
{"title":"创伤风险评估工具在老年车祸患者中的诊断准确性。","authors":"Oluwaseun John Adeyemi, Kester Gibbons, Luke B Schwartz, Ariana T Meltzer-Bruhn, Garrett W Esper, Corita Grudzen, Charles DiMaggio, Joshua Chodosh, Kenneth A Egol, Sanjit R Konda","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The Score for Trauma Triage in the Geriatric and Middle-Aged (STTGMA) is a risk stratification tool. We evaluated the STTGMA's accuracy in predicting 30-day mortality and the odds of unfavorable clinical trajectories among crash-related trauma patients. This retrospective cohort study (n = 912) pooled adults aged 55 years and older from a single institutional trauma database. The data were split into training and test data sets (70:30 ratio) for the receiver operating curve analysis and internal validation, respectively. The outcome variables were 30-day mortality and measures of clinical trajectory. The predictor variable was the high-energy STTGMA score (STTGMAHE). We adjusted for the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status. Using the training and test data sets, STTGMAHE exhibited 82% (95% CI: 65.5-98.3) and 96% (90.7-100.0) accuracies in predicting 30-day mortality, respectively. The STTGMA risk categories significantly stratified the proportions of orthopedic trauma patients who required intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, major and minor complications, and the length of stay (LOS). The odds of ICU admissions, major and minor complications, and the median difference in the LOS increased across the risk categories in a dose-response pattern. STTGMAHE exhibited an excellent level of accuracy in identifying middle-aged and geriatric trauma patients at risk of 30-day mortality and unfavorable clinical trajectories.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":"45 6","pages":"340-351"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11309630/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Accuracy of a Trauma Risk Assessment Tool Among Geriatric Patients With Crash Injuries.\",\"authors\":\"Oluwaseun John Adeyemi, Kester Gibbons, Luke B Schwartz, Ariana T Meltzer-Bruhn, Garrett W Esper, Corita Grudzen, Charles DiMaggio, Joshua Chodosh, Kenneth A Egol, Sanjit R Konda\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The Score for Trauma Triage in the Geriatric and Middle-Aged (STTGMA) is a risk stratification tool. We evaluated the STTGMA's accuracy in predicting 30-day mortality and the odds of unfavorable clinical trajectories among crash-related trauma patients. This retrospective cohort study (n = 912) pooled adults aged 55 years and older from a single institutional trauma database. The data were split into training and test data sets (70:30 ratio) for the receiver operating curve analysis and internal validation, respectively. The outcome variables were 30-day mortality and measures of clinical trajectory. The predictor variable was the high-energy STTGMA score (STTGMAHE). We adjusted for the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status. Using the training and test data sets, STTGMAHE exhibited 82% (95% CI: 65.5-98.3) and 96% (90.7-100.0) accuracies in predicting 30-day mortality, respectively. The STTGMA risk categories significantly stratified the proportions of orthopedic trauma patients who required intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, major and minor complications, and the length of stay (LOS). The odds of ICU admissions, major and minor complications, and the median difference in the LOS increased across the risk categories in a dose-response pattern. STTGMAHE exhibited an excellent level of accuracy in identifying middle-aged and geriatric trauma patients at risk of 30-day mortality and unfavorable clinical trajectories.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Healthcare Quality\",\"volume\":\"45 6\",\"pages\":\"340-351\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11309630/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Healthcare Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000402\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000402","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:中老年创伤分型评分(STTGMA)是一种风险分层工具。我们评估了STTGMA在预测车祸相关创伤患者30天死亡率和不良临床轨迹几率方面的准确性。这项回顾性队列研究(n=912)汇集了一个机构创伤数据库中55岁及以上的成年人。将数据分为训练和测试数据集(70:30的比例),分别用于受试者工作曲线分析和内部验证。结果变量为30天死亡率和临床轨迹测量。预测变量是高能量STTGMA评分(STTGMAHE)。我们根据美国麻醉师协会的身体状况进行了调整。使用训练和测试数据集,STTGMAHE预测30天死亡率的准确率分别为82%(95%CI:65.5-98.3)和96%(90.7-100.0)。STTGMA风险类别对需要入住重症监护室(ICU)的骨科创伤患者比例、主要和次要并发症以及住院时间(LOS)进行了显著分层。ICU入院的几率、主要和次要并发症以及LOS的中位差异在不同风险类别中以剂量反应模式增加。STTGMAHE在识别有30天死亡风险和不良临床轨迹的中老年创伤患者方面表现出出色的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic Accuracy of a Trauma Risk Assessment Tool Among Geriatric Patients With Crash Injuries.

Abstract: The Score for Trauma Triage in the Geriatric and Middle-Aged (STTGMA) is a risk stratification tool. We evaluated the STTGMA's accuracy in predicting 30-day mortality and the odds of unfavorable clinical trajectories among crash-related trauma patients. This retrospective cohort study (n = 912) pooled adults aged 55 years and older from a single institutional trauma database. The data were split into training and test data sets (70:30 ratio) for the receiver operating curve analysis and internal validation, respectively. The outcome variables were 30-day mortality and measures of clinical trajectory. The predictor variable was the high-energy STTGMA score (STTGMAHE). We adjusted for the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status. Using the training and test data sets, STTGMAHE exhibited 82% (95% CI: 65.5-98.3) and 96% (90.7-100.0) accuracies in predicting 30-day mortality, respectively. The STTGMA risk categories significantly stratified the proportions of orthopedic trauma patients who required intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, major and minor complications, and the length of stay (LOS). The odds of ICU admissions, major and minor complications, and the median difference in the LOS increased across the risk categories in a dose-response pattern. STTGMAHE exhibited an excellent level of accuracy in identifying middle-aged and geriatric trauma patients at risk of 30-day mortality and unfavorable clinical trajectories.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Healthcare Quality
Journal for Healthcare Quality HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®. The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as: Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform
期刊最新文献
Optimizing Workplace Violence Reporting in a Multisite Hospital Setting: A Quality Improvement Initiative. Preoperative Optimization of Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Single Institution Cohort. Personalizing Quality Improvement: Addressing Anticoagulation Gaps in Atrial Fibrillation. Implementation of an Evidence-Based Treatment Protocol and Order Set for Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome. Improving Time to Antibiotics for Long-Bone Open Fractures: A Quality Improvement Initiative.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1