黑人和白人痴呆诊断前认知测试得分下降的时间:社区动脉粥样硬化风险神经认知研究(ARIC-NCS)。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neuroepidemiology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-02 DOI:10.1159/000533851
Yunzhi Wang, A Richey Sharrett, Andrea L C Schneider, David Knopman, Jiaqi Hu, Rebecca Gottesman, Kevin J Sullivan, Josef Coresh
{"title":"黑人和白人痴呆诊断前认知测试得分下降的时间:社区动脉粥样硬化风险神经认知研究(ARIC-NCS)。","authors":"Yunzhi Wang, A Richey Sharrett, Andrea L C Schneider, David Knopman, Jiaqi Hu, Rebecca Gottesman, Kevin J Sullivan, Josef Coresh","doi":"10.1159/000533851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Commonly occurring dementias include those of Alzheimer's, vascular, and mixtures of these and other pathologies. They are believed to evolve over many years, but that time interval has been difficult to establish. Our objective was to determine how many years in advance of a dementia diagnosis cognitive scores begin to change.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>14,086 dementia-free ARIC participants underwent a cognitive exam at baseline visit 2 (1990-1992, mean age 57 ± 5.72), and 11,244 at visit 4 (1996-1998), 5,640 at visit 5 (2011-2013), and 3,574 at visit 6 (2016-2017) with surveillance for dementias of all-causes combined. Within 5-year intervals after each visit, we compared performance on the Delayed Word Recall Test (DWRT), the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), the Word Fluency Test (WFT), and the combined mean of three cognitive tests at baseline in participants who were diagnosed with dementia within each interval versus those who survived the interval without a dementia diagnosis. Z-scores were adjusted for demographics and education in separate regression models for each visit. We plotted adjusted z-score means by time interval following each visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During follow-up 3,334, 2,821, 1,218, and 329 dementia cases were ascertained after visits 2, 4, 5, and 6, respectively. Adjusted DWRT z-scores were significantly lower 20-25 years before dementia than those who did not experience dementia within 25 years. DSST z-scores were significantly lower at 25-30 years and 3-test combination z-scores were significantly lower as early as 30-31 years before onset. The difference between dementia and non-dementia group in the visit 2 3-test combination z-score was -0.20 at 30-31 years prior to dementia diagnosis. As expected, differences between the dementia and non-dementia groups increased closer to the time of dementia occurrence, up to their widest point at 0-5 years prior to dementia diagnosis. The difference between dementia and non-dementia groups in the visit 2 3-test combination z-score at 0-5 years was -0.90. WFT z-score differences were smaller than for the DSST or DWRT and began later. Patterns were similar in Black and White participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DWRT, DSST, and combined 3-test z-scores were significantly lower more than 20 years prior to diagnosis in the dementia group versus the non-dementia group. Findings contribute to our knowledge of the long prodromal period in Blacks and Whites.</p>","PeriodicalId":54730,"journal":{"name":"Neuroepidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10910615/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Timing of Cognitive Test Score Decline Prior to Incident Dementia Diagnosis in Blacks and Whites: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Neurocognitive Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yunzhi Wang, A Richey Sharrett, Andrea L C Schneider, David Knopman, Jiaqi Hu, Rebecca Gottesman, Kevin J Sullivan, Josef Coresh\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000533851\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Commonly occurring dementias include those of Alzheimer's, vascular, and mixtures of these and other pathologies. They are believed to evolve over many years, but that time interval has been difficult to establish. Our objective was to determine how many years in advance of a dementia diagnosis cognitive scores begin to change.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>14,086 dementia-free ARIC participants underwent a cognitive exam at baseline visit 2 (1990-1992, mean age 57 ± 5.72), and 11,244 at visit 4 (1996-1998), 5,640 at visit 5 (2011-2013), and 3,574 at visit 6 (2016-2017) with surveillance for dementias of all-causes combined. Within 5-year intervals after each visit, we compared performance on the Delayed Word Recall Test (DWRT), the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), the Word Fluency Test (WFT), and the combined mean of three cognitive tests at baseline in participants who were diagnosed with dementia within each interval versus those who survived the interval without a dementia diagnosis. Z-scores were adjusted for demographics and education in separate regression models for each visit. We plotted adjusted z-score means by time interval following each visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During follow-up 3,334, 2,821, 1,218, and 329 dementia cases were ascertained after visits 2, 4, 5, and 6, respectively. Adjusted DWRT z-scores were significantly lower 20-25 years before dementia than those who did not experience dementia within 25 years. DSST z-scores were significantly lower at 25-30 years and 3-test combination z-scores were significantly lower as early as 30-31 years before onset. The difference between dementia and non-dementia group in the visit 2 3-test combination z-score was -0.20 at 30-31 years prior to dementia diagnosis. As expected, differences between the dementia and non-dementia groups increased closer to the time of dementia occurrence, up to their widest point at 0-5 years prior to dementia diagnosis. The difference between dementia and non-dementia groups in the visit 2 3-test combination z-score at 0-5 years was -0.90. WFT z-score differences were smaller than for the DSST or DWRT and began later. Patterns were similar in Black and White participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DWRT, DSST, and combined 3-test z-scores were significantly lower more than 20 years prior to diagnosis in the dementia group versus the non-dementia group. Findings contribute to our knowledge of the long prodromal period in Blacks and Whites.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroepidemiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10910615/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroepidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000533851\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroepidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000533851","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:常见的痴呆包括阿尔茨海默氏症、血管性痴呆以及这些疾病和其他疾病的混合物。它们被认为是经过多年进化而来的,但这个时间间隔很难确定。我们的目标是确定在痴呆症诊断前多少年认知评分开始改变。方法:14086名无痴呆的ARIC参与者在基线访视2(1990-1992,平均年龄57±5.72)、11244名访视4(1996-1998)、5640名访视5(2011-2013)和3574名访视6(2016-2017)接受了认知检查,并对所有原因的痴呆进行了监测。在每次就诊后的5年时间间隔内,我们比较了在每个时间间隔内被诊断为痴呆症的参与者与在没有被诊断为失智症的时间间隔内存活的参与者在延迟单词回忆测试(DWRT)、数字符号替换测试(DSST)、单词流利性测试(WFT)和基线三项认知测试的组合平均值方面的表现。在每次就诊的单独回归模型中,根据人口统计和教育情况调整Z评分。我们绘制了每次就诊后按时间间隔调整的z评分平均值。结果:在随访期间,第2次、第4次、第5次和第6次就诊后分别确定了3334例、2821例、1218例和329例痴呆病例。痴呆前20-25年的调整后DWRT z评分显著低于25年内未经历痴呆的患者。DSST z评分在发病前25-30年显著降低,3项测试组合z评分早在发病前30-31年显著降低。在诊断为痴呆之前的30-31年,痴呆组和非痴呆组在访视2 3测试组合z评分中的差异为-0.20。正如预期的那样,痴呆症组和非痴呆症组之间的差异在接近痴呆症发生时增加,在痴呆症诊断前0-5年达到最大值。痴呆组和非痴呆组在访视2-3测试组合z评分中的差异为-0.90。WFT z评分差异小于DSST或DWRT,并且开始较晚。黑人和白人参与者的模式相似。结论:与非痴呆组相比,痴呆组在诊断前20多年的DWRT、DSST和联合3项测试z评分显著降低。研究结果有助于我们了解黑人和白人的长期前驱期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Timing of Cognitive Test Score Decline Prior to Incident Dementia Diagnosis in Blacks and Whites: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Neurocognitive Study.

Introduction: Commonly occurring dementias include those of Alzheimer's, vascular, and mixtures of these and other pathologies. They are believed to evolve over many years, but that time interval has been difficult to establish. Our objective was to determine how many years in advance of a dementia diagnosis cognitive scores begin to change.

Methods: 14,086 dementia-free ARIC participants underwent a cognitive exam at baseline visit 2 (1990-1992, mean age 57 ± 5.72), and 11,244 at visit 4 (1996-1998), 5,640 at visit 5 (2011-2013), and 3,574 at visit 6 (2016-2017) with surveillance for dementias of all-causes combined. Within 5-year intervals after each visit, we compared performance on the Delayed Word Recall Test (DWRT), the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), the Word Fluency Test (WFT), and the combined mean of three cognitive tests at baseline in participants who were diagnosed with dementia within each interval versus those who survived the interval without a dementia diagnosis. Z-scores were adjusted for demographics and education in separate regression models for each visit. We plotted adjusted z-score means by time interval following each visit.

Results: During follow-up 3,334, 2,821, 1,218, and 329 dementia cases were ascertained after visits 2, 4, 5, and 6, respectively. Adjusted DWRT z-scores were significantly lower 20-25 years before dementia than those who did not experience dementia within 25 years. DSST z-scores were significantly lower at 25-30 years and 3-test combination z-scores were significantly lower as early as 30-31 years before onset. The difference between dementia and non-dementia group in the visit 2 3-test combination z-score was -0.20 at 30-31 years prior to dementia diagnosis. As expected, differences between the dementia and non-dementia groups increased closer to the time of dementia occurrence, up to their widest point at 0-5 years prior to dementia diagnosis. The difference between dementia and non-dementia groups in the visit 2 3-test combination z-score at 0-5 years was -0.90. WFT z-score differences were smaller than for the DSST or DWRT and began later. Patterns were similar in Black and White participants.

Conclusion: DWRT, DSST, and combined 3-test z-scores were significantly lower more than 20 years prior to diagnosis in the dementia group versus the non-dementia group. Findings contribute to our knowledge of the long prodromal period in Blacks and Whites.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroepidemiology
Neuroepidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Neuroepidemiology'' is the only internationally recognised peer-reviewed periodical devoted to descriptive, analytical and experimental studies in the epidemiology of neurologic disease. The scope of the journal expands the boundaries of traditional clinical neurology by providing new insights regarding the etiology, determinants, distribution, management and prevention of diseases of the nervous system.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence, incidence, and mortality of Myasthenia Gravis and myasthenic syndromes: a systematic review. Strength of Association between Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Neurological Disorders in Children: A Case-Control Study. Low sun exposure is associated with both progressive-onset and relapse-onset multiple sclerosis risk: a case-control study. Changing Epidemiology of Neurological Diseases in Africa. Insights from ARCOS-V's Transition to Remote Data Collection During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Descriptive Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1