美托洛尔和比索洛尔心电图结果的比较。

Ahmad Abdulrahman Almeman, Yousef Obaid Alharbi, Abdulaziz Sulaiman Alwahhabi, Abdulaziz Abdullah Almutairi, Moayad Yousef Alnasr, Abdulrahaman Almesnid
{"title":"美托洛尔和比索洛尔心电图结果的比较。","authors":"Ahmad Abdulrahman Almeman, Yousef Obaid Alharbi, Abdulaziz Sulaiman Alwahhabi, Abdulaziz Abdullah Almutairi, Moayad Yousef Alnasr, Abdulrahaman Almesnid","doi":"10.2174/0118715257252349231018151957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Beta-blockers are essential agents in the management of cardiovascular diseases, such as heart failure, acute myocardial infarction (MI), and cardiac arrhythmias. However, there are diurnal variations in the cardioprotective effects of the subgroups as a result of their different pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacogenetic profiles.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to compare metoprolol and bisoprolol in terms of electrocardiogram (ECG) outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at Prince Sultan Cardiac Center. The trial included 404 patients who met the inclusion criteria (204 in the metoprolol arm and 200 in the bisoprolol arm). Using case record forms that had already been created, information, such as patient demographics, medical histories, and treatment histories, was taken from their medical files. The most recent ECG records were also gathered. The ethical approval for this study was obtained from Qassim ethical committee (approval number: 45-44-902).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference found between the patients in both arms in terms of baseline characteristics, age, or sex.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this retrospective cross-sectional study, we have compared the effects of metoprolol and bisoprolol beta blockers on ECG changes. The findings have indicated no difference between metoprolol and bisoprolol groups in terms of all ECG readings, particularly PR/ms, QTC-ms, and ventricular rate. Further studies are required to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":93924,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular & hematological agents in medicinal chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between the ECG Outcomes of Metoprolol and Bisoprolol.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Abdulrahman Almeman, Yousef Obaid Alharbi, Abdulaziz Sulaiman Alwahhabi, Abdulaziz Abdullah Almutairi, Moayad Yousef Alnasr, Abdulrahaman Almesnid\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0118715257252349231018151957\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Beta-blockers are essential agents in the management of cardiovascular diseases, such as heart failure, acute myocardial infarction (MI), and cardiac arrhythmias. However, there are diurnal variations in the cardioprotective effects of the subgroups as a result of their different pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacogenetic profiles.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to compare metoprolol and bisoprolol in terms of electrocardiogram (ECG) outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at Prince Sultan Cardiac Center. The trial included 404 patients who met the inclusion criteria (204 in the metoprolol arm and 200 in the bisoprolol arm). Using case record forms that had already been created, information, such as patient demographics, medical histories, and treatment histories, was taken from their medical files. The most recent ECG records were also gathered. The ethical approval for this study was obtained from Qassim ethical committee (approval number: 45-44-902).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference found between the patients in both arms in terms of baseline characteristics, age, or sex.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this retrospective cross-sectional study, we have compared the effects of metoprolol and bisoprolol beta blockers on ECG changes. The findings have indicated no difference between metoprolol and bisoprolol groups in terms of all ECG readings, particularly PR/ms, QTC-ms, and ventricular rate. Further studies are required to confirm these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93924,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular & hematological agents in medicinal chemistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular & hematological agents in medicinal chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118715257252349231018151957\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular & hematological agents in medicinal chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118715257252349231018151957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:β受体阻滞剂是治疗心血管疾病的重要药物,如心力衰竭、急性心肌梗死和心律失常。然而,由于不同的药代动力学、药效学和药物遗传学特征,亚组的心脏保护作用存在昼夜变化。目的:我们旨在比较美托洛尔和比索洛尔在心电图(ECG)方面的结果。方法:在苏丹王子心脏中心进行回顾性横断面研究。该试验包括404名符合纳入标准的患者(美托洛尔组204名,比索洛尔组200名)。使用已经创建的病例记录表,从他们的医疗档案中获取患者人口统计、病史和治疗史等信息。还收集了最近的心电图记录。本研究获得了Qassim伦理委员会的伦理批准(批准号:45-44-902)。结果:两组患者在基线特征、年龄或性别方面没有发现显著差异。结论:在这项回顾性横断面研究中,我们比较了美托洛尔和比索洛尔β受体阻滞剂对心电图变化的影响。研究结果表明,美托洛尔组和比索洛尔组在所有心电图读数,特别是PR/ms、QTC ms和心室率方面没有差异。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison between the ECG Outcomes of Metoprolol and Bisoprolol.

Background: Beta-blockers are essential agents in the management of cardiovascular diseases, such as heart failure, acute myocardial infarction (MI), and cardiac arrhythmias. However, there are diurnal variations in the cardioprotective effects of the subgroups as a result of their different pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacogenetic profiles.

Objectives: We aimed to compare metoprolol and bisoprolol in terms of electrocardiogram (ECG) outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at Prince Sultan Cardiac Center. The trial included 404 patients who met the inclusion criteria (204 in the metoprolol arm and 200 in the bisoprolol arm). Using case record forms that had already been created, information, such as patient demographics, medical histories, and treatment histories, was taken from their medical files. The most recent ECG records were also gathered. The ethical approval for this study was obtained from Qassim ethical committee (approval number: 45-44-902).

Results: There was no significant difference found between the patients in both arms in terms of baseline characteristics, age, or sex.

Conclusion: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, we have compared the effects of metoprolol and bisoprolol beta blockers on ECG changes. The findings have indicated no difference between metoprolol and bisoprolol groups in terms of all ECG readings, particularly PR/ms, QTC-ms, and ventricular rate. Further studies are required to confirm these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cardio-metabolic Disorders Affected by Genetic Polymorphisms Related to Premature Menopause. Factor Xa Inhibitors and Low Molecular Weight Heparins in Perioperative Surgical Thromboprophylaxis: A Network Meta-Analysis. Iron Deficiency and its Relationship with Chronic Heart Failure- A Review. Sodium Butyrate, a Gut Microbiota Derived Metabolite, in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiovascular Disease: A Review. The Effect of CD31 on Coronary Collateral Development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1