与下巴抬高的中立位置相比,嗅闻位置更容易进行光棒引导的气管插管。

Anesthesia and pain medicine Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-30 DOI:10.17085/apm.23079
Gunn Hee Kim, Eun Jae Jung, Yun Jae Han, Mi Jung Yun
{"title":"与下巴抬高的中立位置相比,嗅闻位置更容易进行光棒引导的气管插管。","authors":"Gunn Hee Kim, Eun Jae Jung, Yun Jae Han, Mi Jung Yun","doi":"10.17085/apm.23079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditionally, the patient's head is placed in a neutral position with a chin-lift to facilitate light wand guided endotracheal intubation. However, our study found that the sniffing position was more effective. In this study, we aimed to compare the two positions of light wand guided endotracheal intubation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty adult patients were included in the study, after obtaining informed consent, and were randomly assigned to one of two groups: a control group in a neutral position with a chin-lift (group C, n = 30) and a sniffing position group (group S, n = 30). In group C, the anesthesiologist inserted a light wand after lifting the patient's mandible using the thumb of their non-dominant hand inside the patient's mouth. In group S, a light wand was inserted after the patient's head was flexed with the neck extended. We assessed variables such as light-search time, number of intubation attempts, time to achieve intubation, and side effects including blood tinge on the endotracheal tube, hoarseness, sore throat, and anesthesiologist satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The light-search and intubation times were shorter in group S than in group C. The incidence of blood tinge on the endotracheal tube was higher in group C than in group S. Anesthesiologist satisfaction was higher in group S than in group C.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The sniffing position was more effective in facilitating light wand guided endotracheal intubation than the neutral position with a chin-lift.</p>","PeriodicalId":101360,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"18 4","pages":"431-438"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635851/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The sniffing position facilitated easier light wand guided endotracheal intubation compared with the neutral position with chin-lift.\",\"authors\":\"Gunn Hee Kim, Eun Jae Jung, Yun Jae Han, Mi Jung Yun\",\"doi\":\"10.17085/apm.23079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditionally, the patient's head is placed in a neutral position with a chin-lift to facilitate light wand guided endotracheal intubation. However, our study found that the sniffing position was more effective. In this study, we aimed to compare the two positions of light wand guided endotracheal intubation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty adult patients were included in the study, after obtaining informed consent, and were randomly assigned to one of two groups: a control group in a neutral position with a chin-lift (group C, n = 30) and a sniffing position group (group S, n = 30). In group C, the anesthesiologist inserted a light wand after lifting the patient's mandible using the thumb of their non-dominant hand inside the patient's mouth. In group S, a light wand was inserted after the patient's head was flexed with the neck extended. We assessed variables such as light-search time, number of intubation attempts, time to achieve intubation, and side effects including blood tinge on the endotracheal tube, hoarseness, sore throat, and anesthesiologist satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The light-search and intubation times were shorter in group S than in group C. The incidence of blood tinge on the endotracheal tube was higher in group C than in group S. Anesthesiologist satisfaction was higher in group S than in group C.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The sniffing position was more effective in facilitating light wand guided endotracheal intubation than the neutral position with a chin-lift.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia and pain medicine\",\"volume\":\"18 4\",\"pages\":\"431-438\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635851/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia and pain medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.23079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.23079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:传统上,患者的头部放置在中立位置,下巴抬高,以便于光导棒引导的气管插管。然而,我们的研究发现,嗅探姿势更有效。在本研究中,我们旨在比较光导棒引导的气管插管的两种位置。方法:在获得知情同意后,60名成年患者被纳入研究,并被随机分为两组之一:一组为中立位下巴抬高的对照组(C组,n=30),另一组为嗅闻位组(S组,n=30%)。在C组中,麻醉师在用非惯用手的拇指将患者的下颌骨抬到患者口腔内后,插入了一根光棒。在S组中,在患者头部弯曲、颈部伸展后插入光棒。我们评估了一些变量,如光搜索时间、插管次数、插管时间和副作用,包括气管插管带血、声音嘶哑、喉咙痛和麻醉师满意度。结果:S组光搜索和插管时间均短于C组,气管插管带血的发生率C组高于S组。S组的麻醉师满意度高于C组。结论:嗅探位在光导棒引导下气管插管方面比下巴抬高的中立位更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The sniffing position facilitated easier light wand guided endotracheal intubation compared with the neutral position with chin-lift.

Background: Traditionally, the patient's head is placed in a neutral position with a chin-lift to facilitate light wand guided endotracheal intubation. However, our study found that the sniffing position was more effective. In this study, we aimed to compare the two positions of light wand guided endotracheal intubation.

Methods: Sixty adult patients were included in the study, after obtaining informed consent, and were randomly assigned to one of two groups: a control group in a neutral position with a chin-lift (group C, n = 30) and a sniffing position group (group S, n = 30). In group C, the anesthesiologist inserted a light wand after lifting the patient's mandible using the thumb of their non-dominant hand inside the patient's mouth. In group S, a light wand was inserted after the patient's head was flexed with the neck extended. We assessed variables such as light-search time, number of intubation attempts, time to achieve intubation, and side effects including blood tinge on the endotracheal tube, hoarseness, sore throat, and anesthesiologist satisfaction.

Results: The light-search and intubation times were shorter in group S than in group C. The incidence of blood tinge on the endotracheal tube was higher in group C than in group S. Anesthesiologist satisfaction was higher in group S than in group C.

Conclusions: The sniffing position was more effective in facilitating light wand guided endotracheal intubation than the neutral position with a chin-lift.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of characteristics of patients whose sugammadex claims were denied by the Auto Insurance Claims Review Department of Korean Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service: a retrospective single-center review. What is your optimal target of oxygen during general anesthesia in pediatric patients? Early extubation after pediatric cardiac surgery. Effective and safe pediatric sedation. Emergence delirium: an overview with an emphasis on the use of electroencephalography in its management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1