骨水泥对骨水泥去除系统在髋关节和膝关节置换翻修手术中的有效性和安全性。

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Acta orthopaedica Belgica Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.52628/89.2.11562
Miguel Tovar-Bazaga, David Sáez-Martínez, Álvaro Auñón, Felipe López-Oliva, Emilio Calvo
{"title":"骨水泥对骨水泥去除系统在髋关节和膝关节置换翻修手术中的有效性和安全性。","authors":"Miguel Tovar-Bazaga,&nbsp;David Sáez-Martínez,&nbsp;Álvaro Auñón,&nbsp;Felipe López-Oliva,&nbsp;Emilio Calvo","doi":"10.52628/89.2.11562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cement removal during hip or knee arthroplasty revision is challenging and not exempt of complications. Cement-on-cement procedure is among techniques developed to safe removal of cement from bone, and it could be a realistic solution. This cement-on-cement devices can provide advantages in removing bone cement during hip and knee arthroplasty septic and non-septic revision surgeries, and can be regarded as an effective and safe alternative. We present our experience using the cement-on-cement technique in 34 cases between 2010 and 2021, including revision surgeries for 20 knee and 14 hip arthroplasties. In 3 out of 34 cases the technique failed, with a success of 91%. Mean surgical time was 2.77 (SD 0.93) hours and blood transfusion was required in 23 cases. Success was achieved in every aseptic case. Of all patients, 60% were septic cases. Infection was considered to be eradicated in 70% (14/20) of patients with a septic revision. Cement-on-cement is a safe and effective alternative for cement removal during hip and knee arthroplasty revision. Level of evidence: III, retrospective case series.</p>","PeriodicalId":7018,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","volume":"89 2","pages":"348-354"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness and safety of a cement-on-cement removal system for hip and knee arthroplasty revision surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Miguel Tovar-Bazaga,&nbsp;David Sáez-Martínez,&nbsp;Álvaro Auñón,&nbsp;Felipe López-Oliva,&nbsp;Emilio Calvo\",\"doi\":\"10.52628/89.2.11562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cement removal during hip or knee arthroplasty revision is challenging and not exempt of complications. Cement-on-cement procedure is among techniques developed to safe removal of cement from bone, and it could be a realistic solution. This cement-on-cement devices can provide advantages in removing bone cement during hip and knee arthroplasty septic and non-septic revision surgeries, and can be regarded as an effective and safe alternative. We present our experience using the cement-on-cement technique in 34 cases between 2010 and 2021, including revision surgeries for 20 knee and 14 hip arthroplasties. In 3 out of 34 cases the technique failed, with a success of 91%. Mean surgical time was 2.77 (SD 0.93) hours and blood transfusion was required in 23 cases. Success was achieved in every aseptic case. Of all patients, 60% were septic cases. Infection was considered to be eradicated in 70% (14/20) of patients with a septic revision. Cement-on-cement is a safe and effective alternative for cement removal during hip and knee arthroplasty revision. Level of evidence: III, retrospective case series.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta orthopaedica Belgica\",\"volume\":\"89 2\",\"pages\":\"348-354\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta orthopaedica Belgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52628/89.2.11562\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52628/89.2.11562","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

髋关节或膝关节置换术翻修过程中的水泥去除具有挑战性,并且不能避免并发症。水泥对水泥程序是为安全地从骨中去除水泥而开发的技术之一,这可能是一个现实的解决方案。这种骨水泥-骨水泥装置可以在髋关节和膝关节置换术感染性和非感染性翻修手术中去除骨水泥,并且可以被视为一种有效和安全的替代方案。我们介绍了2010年至2021年间在34例病例中使用骨水泥技术的经验,包括20例膝关节和14例髋关节置换术的翻修手术。34例中有3例失败,成功率为91%。平均手术时间为2.77小时(SD 0.93),23例需要输血。每个无菌病例都取得了成功。在所有患者中,60%为败血症病例。70%(14/20)的感染性翻修患者被认为可以根除感染。骨水泥对骨水泥是髋关节和膝关节置换术翻修过程中去除骨水泥的一种安全有效的替代方法。证据级别:三,回顾性系列案件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness and safety of a cement-on-cement removal system for hip and knee arthroplasty revision surgery.

Cement removal during hip or knee arthroplasty revision is challenging and not exempt of complications. Cement-on-cement procedure is among techniques developed to safe removal of cement from bone, and it could be a realistic solution. This cement-on-cement devices can provide advantages in removing bone cement during hip and knee arthroplasty septic and non-septic revision surgeries, and can be regarded as an effective and safe alternative. We present our experience using the cement-on-cement technique in 34 cases between 2010 and 2021, including revision surgeries for 20 knee and 14 hip arthroplasties. In 3 out of 34 cases the technique failed, with a success of 91%. Mean surgical time was 2.77 (SD 0.93) hours and blood transfusion was required in 23 cases. Success was achieved in every aseptic case. Of all patients, 60% were septic cases. Infection was considered to be eradicated in 70% (14/20) of patients with a septic revision. Cement-on-cement is a safe and effective alternative for cement removal during hip and knee arthroplasty revision. Level of evidence: III, retrospective case series.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta orthopaedica Belgica
Acta orthopaedica Belgica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Challenges in identifying the underlying cause of extensive osteonecrosis: an illustrative example and clinical guide. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica: Entering the Digital Era. Does metformin administration improve fracture healing? A systematic review of preclinical studies. Critical shoulder angle does not correlate with patient outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Does the use of parameters derived from complete blood count increase the accuracy of septic arthritis diagnosis in adult patients?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1