在全膝关节置换术中骨切除前测量内侧间隙是否能提供最佳间隙调整并防止骨切除?

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Acta orthopaedica Belgica Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.52628/89.3.10208
U Tiftikçi, S Serbest, Ö Kaya, S I Keskinkiliç, C Y Kilinç, A Firat
{"title":"在全膝关节置换术中骨切除前测量内侧间隙是否能提供最佳间隙调整并防止骨切除?","authors":"U Tiftikçi, S Serbest, Ö Kaya, S I Keskinkiliç, C Y Kilinç, A Firat","doi":"10.52628/89.3.10208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to demonstrate that measuring the medial gap before bone resection during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) provides an optimum gap adjustment in varus knees. In this study, patients were separated into two groups. Group 1 included patients whose medial joint gap was measured before bone resection and Group 2 included patients who underwent conventional technique without measuring. The medial joint gap was measured with a custom-made gap measuring device up to the point that the knee was corrected and aligned along its mechanical axis. Medial joint gap distances, distal medial femoral bone cut thicknesses, amounts of tibial resection calculated; gap internal distances measured after cutting and the thicknesses of the trial inserts were recorded. A comparison was made between the groups concerning the number of patients requiring an additional tibial bone cut and the distribution of insert thicknesses. Extra tibial bone resections were performed in two (5.7%) patients in Group 1 and 10 (28.6%) patients in Group 2. In Group 1, where the medial joint gap was measured, the need for an additional bone resection was statistically less (p=0.018). In comparing the distribution of insert size by group, the number of patients on whom an 8 mm insert had been used was significantly greater in Group 1 (p=0.024). The findings obtained in this study suggest that measuring the medial joint gap before bone resection in total knee arthroplasty may prevent repeated bone recutting and additional bone resections.</p>","PeriodicalId":7018,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does measuring the medial gap before bone resection in total knee arthroplasty provide optimum gap adjustment and prevent bone recutting?\",\"authors\":\"U Tiftikçi, S Serbest, Ö Kaya, S I Keskinkiliç, C Y Kilinç, A Firat\",\"doi\":\"10.52628/89.3.10208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to demonstrate that measuring the medial gap before bone resection during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) provides an optimum gap adjustment in varus knees. In this study, patients were separated into two groups. Group 1 included patients whose medial joint gap was measured before bone resection and Group 2 included patients who underwent conventional technique without measuring. The medial joint gap was measured with a custom-made gap measuring device up to the point that the knee was corrected and aligned along its mechanical axis. Medial joint gap distances, distal medial femoral bone cut thicknesses, amounts of tibial resection calculated; gap internal distances measured after cutting and the thicknesses of the trial inserts were recorded. A comparison was made between the groups concerning the number of patients requiring an additional tibial bone cut and the distribution of insert thicknesses. Extra tibial bone resections were performed in two (5.7%) patients in Group 1 and 10 (28.6%) patients in Group 2. In Group 1, where the medial joint gap was measured, the need for an additional bone resection was statistically less (p=0.018). In comparing the distribution of insert size by group, the number of patients on whom an 8 mm insert had been used was significantly greater in Group 1 (p=0.024). The findings obtained in this study suggest that measuring the medial joint gap before bone resection in total knee arthroplasty may prevent repeated bone recutting and additional bone resections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta orthopaedica Belgica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta orthopaedica Belgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52628/89.3.10208\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52628/89.3.10208","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在证明,在全膝关节置换术(TKA)骨切除前测量内侧间隙可为膝内翻提供最佳间隙调整。在这项研究中,患者被分为两组。第1组包括在骨切除前测量内侧关节间隙的患者,第2组包括在不测量的情况下采用常规技术的患者。使用定制的间隙测量装置测量内侧关节间隙,直到膝盖被矫正并沿其机械轴对齐。计算内侧关节间隙距离、股骨远端内侧骨切口厚度、胫骨切除量;记录切割后测量的间隙内部距离和试验刀片的厚度。两组之间就需要额外胫骨切割的患者数量和插入物厚度的分布进行了比较。第1组2例(5.7%)患者和第2组10例(28.6%)患者进行了胫骨外骨切除。在测量内侧关节间隙的第1组中,额外骨切除的需要在统计学上较少(p=0.018)。在比较各组插入物大小的分布时,在第1组中,使用8mm插入物的患者数量显著增加(p=0.024)。本研究中获得的结果表明,在全膝关节置换术中骨切除前测量内侧关节间隙可以防止重复的骨切除和额外的骨切除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does measuring the medial gap before bone resection in total knee arthroplasty provide optimum gap adjustment and prevent bone recutting?

This study aimed to demonstrate that measuring the medial gap before bone resection during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) provides an optimum gap adjustment in varus knees. In this study, patients were separated into two groups. Group 1 included patients whose medial joint gap was measured before bone resection and Group 2 included patients who underwent conventional technique without measuring. The medial joint gap was measured with a custom-made gap measuring device up to the point that the knee was corrected and aligned along its mechanical axis. Medial joint gap distances, distal medial femoral bone cut thicknesses, amounts of tibial resection calculated; gap internal distances measured after cutting and the thicknesses of the trial inserts were recorded. A comparison was made between the groups concerning the number of patients requiring an additional tibial bone cut and the distribution of insert thicknesses. Extra tibial bone resections were performed in two (5.7%) patients in Group 1 and 10 (28.6%) patients in Group 2. In Group 1, where the medial joint gap was measured, the need for an additional bone resection was statistically less (p=0.018). In comparing the distribution of insert size by group, the number of patients on whom an 8 mm insert had been used was significantly greater in Group 1 (p=0.024). The findings obtained in this study suggest that measuring the medial joint gap before bone resection in total knee arthroplasty may prevent repeated bone recutting and additional bone resections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta orthopaedica Belgica
Acta orthopaedica Belgica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Clavicular tunnel widening after acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: comparison between single and double clavicular tunnel techniques. Patients' perspective of fast-track total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. Advanced osteoarthritis of the hip as reason for extensive asymmetric leg edema: a rare case report and review of the literature. Patient with knee osteoarthritis demonstrates improved knee adduction moment after knee joint distraction: a case report. Cubital tunnel release with Wide Awake Local Anaesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) technique in an outpatient setting is safe and effective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1