隐源性脑卒中的二级预防和福拉门Ovale封闭手术加药物治疗与单独药物治疗后的结果:覆盖17个国家的8项荟萃分析的伞式荟萃分析。

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiology Research Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-12 DOI:10.14740/cr1526
Urvish Patel, Chetna Dengri, David Pielykh, Aakash Baskar, Muhammad Imtiaz Tar, Greshaben Patel, Neel Patel, Nishel Kothari, Sri Abirami Selvam, Amit Munshi Sharma, Vikramaditya Samela Venkata, Shamik Shah, Syed Nazeer Mahmood, Appala Suman Peela
{"title":"隐源性脑卒中的二级预防和福拉门Ovale封闭手术加药物治疗与单独药物治疗后的结果:覆盖17个国家的8项荟萃分析的伞式荟萃分析。","authors":"Urvish Patel, Chetna Dengri, David Pielykh, Aakash Baskar, Muhammad Imtiaz Tar, Greshaben Patel, Neel Patel, Nishel Kothari, Sri Abirami Selvam, Amit Munshi Sharma, Vikramaditya Samela Venkata, Shamik Shah, Syed Nazeer Mahmood, Appala Suman Peela","doi":"10.14740/cr1526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cryptogenic stroke (CS) is an exclusion diagnosis that accounts for 10-40% of all ischemic strokes. Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is found in 66% of patients with CS, while having a prevalence of 25-30% in the general population. The primary aim was to evaluate the risk of recurrent stroke following surgical PFO closure plus medical therapy vs. medical therapy alone amongst CS, an embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS), or transient ischemic attack (TIA). The secondary aim was to evaluate new-onset non-valvular atrial fibrillation, mortality, and major bleeding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an umbrella meta-analysis using PRISMA guidelines on English studies comparing surgical PFO closure plus medical therapy versus medical therapy alone for managing CS. We extracted data on interventions and outcomes and used random-effects models with generic inverse variance to calculate relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals for outcome calculations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A comprehensive search yielded 54,729 articles on CS and 65,001 on surgical PFO closure, with 1,591 studies focusing on PFO closure and medical therapy for secondary CS, ESUS, or TIA prevention. After excluding non-meta-analyses, 52 eligible meta-analyses were identified, and eight studies were selected for outcome evaluation, excluding non-English, non-human, and studies before January 2019 as of August 31, 2021. Among a total of 41,880 patients, 14,942 received PFO closure + medical therapy, while 26,938 patients received medical therapy alone. Our umbrella meta-analysis showed that PFO closure plus medical therapy had a 64% lower risk of recurrent strokes than medical therapy alone (pooled RR: 0.36). PFO closure plus medical therapy was associated with 4.94 times higher risk of atrial fibrillation. There was no difference in the risk of death or bleeding between both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with CS, PFO closure, in addition to medical therapy, reduces the risk of recurrence. More research is needed to assess the efficacy of early closure as well as specific risk profiles that would benefit from early intervention to reduce the burden of stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":9424,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research","volume":"14 5","pages":"342-350"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627369/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Secondary Prevention of Cryptogenic Stroke and Outcomes Following Surgical Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Plus Medical Therapy vs. Medical Therapy Alone: An Umbrella Meta-Analysis of Eight Meta-Analyses Covering Seventeen Countries.\",\"authors\":\"Urvish Patel, Chetna Dengri, David Pielykh, Aakash Baskar, Muhammad Imtiaz Tar, Greshaben Patel, Neel Patel, Nishel Kothari, Sri Abirami Selvam, Amit Munshi Sharma, Vikramaditya Samela Venkata, Shamik Shah, Syed Nazeer Mahmood, Appala Suman Peela\",\"doi\":\"10.14740/cr1526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cryptogenic stroke (CS) is an exclusion diagnosis that accounts for 10-40% of all ischemic strokes. Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is found in 66% of patients with CS, while having a prevalence of 25-30% in the general population. The primary aim was to evaluate the risk of recurrent stroke following surgical PFO closure plus medical therapy vs. medical therapy alone amongst CS, an embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS), or transient ischemic attack (TIA). The secondary aim was to evaluate new-onset non-valvular atrial fibrillation, mortality, and major bleeding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an umbrella meta-analysis using PRISMA guidelines on English studies comparing surgical PFO closure plus medical therapy versus medical therapy alone for managing CS. We extracted data on interventions and outcomes and used random-effects models with generic inverse variance to calculate relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals for outcome calculations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A comprehensive search yielded 54,729 articles on CS and 65,001 on surgical PFO closure, with 1,591 studies focusing on PFO closure and medical therapy for secondary CS, ESUS, or TIA prevention. After excluding non-meta-analyses, 52 eligible meta-analyses were identified, and eight studies were selected for outcome evaluation, excluding non-English, non-human, and studies before January 2019 as of August 31, 2021. Among a total of 41,880 patients, 14,942 received PFO closure + medical therapy, while 26,938 patients received medical therapy alone. Our umbrella meta-analysis showed that PFO closure plus medical therapy had a 64% lower risk of recurrent strokes than medical therapy alone (pooled RR: 0.36). PFO closure plus medical therapy was associated with 4.94 times higher risk of atrial fibrillation. There was no difference in the risk of death or bleeding between both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with CS, PFO closure, in addition to medical therapy, reduces the risk of recurrence. More research is needed to assess the efficacy of early closure as well as specific risk profiles that would benefit from early intervention to reduce the burden of stroke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology Research\",\"volume\":\"14 5\",\"pages\":\"342-350\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627369/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14740/cr1526\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/cr1526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:隐源性中风(CS)是一种排除性诊断,占所有缺血性中风的10-40%。66%的CS患者出现卵圆孔未闭(PFO),而在普通人群中的患病率为25-30%。主要目的是评估CS、来源不明的栓塞性卒中(ESUS)或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)患者在外科PFO闭合加药物治疗与单独药物治疗后复发性卒中的风险。次要目的是评估新发非瓣膜性心房颤动、死亡率和大出血。方法:我们使用PRISMA指南对英国研究进行了一项总括性荟萃分析,比较了外科PFO闭合加药物治疗与单独药物治疗治疗CS的疗效。我们提取了干预措施和结果的数据,并使用具有一般逆方差的随机效应模型来计算结果计算的相对风险(RR),置信区间为95%。结果:一项全面的搜索产生了54729篇关于CS的文章和65001篇关于外科PFO闭合的文章,其中1591项研究侧重于PFO闭合和继发CS、ESUS或TIA预防的药物治疗。在排除非荟萃分析后,确定了52项符合条件的荟萃分析,并选择了8项研究进行结果评估,不包括截至2021年8月31日的非英语、非人类和2019年1月之前的研究。在41880名患者中,14942名患者接受了PFO封闭+药物治疗,26938名患者仅接受了药物治疗。我们的总括荟萃分析显示,PFO封闭加药物治疗复发性中风的风险比单独药物治疗低64%(合并RR:0.36)。PFO封闭+药物治疗与心房颤动风险高4.94倍相关。两组患者的死亡或出血风险没有差异。结论:在CS患者中,PFO封闭,除了药物治疗外,还能降低复发的风险。需要更多的研究来评估早期闭合的疗效以及从早期干预中受益的特定风险状况,以减轻中风的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Secondary Prevention of Cryptogenic Stroke and Outcomes Following Surgical Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Plus Medical Therapy vs. Medical Therapy Alone: An Umbrella Meta-Analysis of Eight Meta-Analyses Covering Seventeen Countries.

Background: Cryptogenic stroke (CS) is an exclusion diagnosis that accounts for 10-40% of all ischemic strokes. Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is found in 66% of patients with CS, while having a prevalence of 25-30% in the general population. The primary aim was to evaluate the risk of recurrent stroke following surgical PFO closure plus medical therapy vs. medical therapy alone amongst CS, an embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS), or transient ischemic attack (TIA). The secondary aim was to evaluate new-onset non-valvular atrial fibrillation, mortality, and major bleeding.

Methods: We conducted an umbrella meta-analysis using PRISMA guidelines on English studies comparing surgical PFO closure plus medical therapy versus medical therapy alone for managing CS. We extracted data on interventions and outcomes and used random-effects models with generic inverse variance to calculate relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals for outcome calculations.

Results: A comprehensive search yielded 54,729 articles on CS and 65,001 on surgical PFO closure, with 1,591 studies focusing on PFO closure and medical therapy for secondary CS, ESUS, or TIA prevention. After excluding non-meta-analyses, 52 eligible meta-analyses were identified, and eight studies were selected for outcome evaluation, excluding non-English, non-human, and studies before January 2019 as of August 31, 2021. Among a total of 41,880 patients, 14,942 received PFO closure + medical therapy, while 26,938 patients received medical therapy alone. Our umbrella meta-analysis showed that PFO closure plus medical therapy had a 64% lower risk of recurrent strokes than medical therapy alone (pooled RR: 0.36). PFO closure plus medical therapy was associated with 4.94 times higher risk of atrial fibrillation. There was no difference in the risk of death or bleeding between both groups.

Conclusion: In patients with CS, PFO closure, in addition to medical therapy, reduces the risk of recurrence. More research is needed to assess the efficacy of early closure as well as specific risk profiles that would benefit from early intervention to reduce the burden of stroke.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology Research
Cardiology Research CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Cardiology Research is an open access, peer-reviewed, international journal. All submissions relating to basic research and clinical practice of cardiology and cardiovascular medicine are in this journal''s scope. This journal focuses on publishing original research and observations in all cardiovascular medicine aspects. Manuscript types include original article, review, case report, short communication, book review, letter to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Advances in the Understanding and Treatment of Chronic Chagas Cardiomyopathy. Detection of Left Atrial Remodeling by Three-Dimensional Echocardiography in Symptomatic Patients Known to Had Non-Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Diverse Concepts in Definitions of Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Theory and Practice. Effect of Post-Loop Diuretic Urinary Sodium Level on Length of Stay and Rehospitalization in Acutely Decompensated Heart Failure Patients. Evaluating the Prognostic Value of the Modified H2FPEF Score in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1