一体化是如何定义和衡量的,是什么因素推动了巴西的成功?综合评论。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal of Integrated Care Pub Date : 2023-10-31 eCollection Date: 2023-10-01 DOI:10.5334/ijic.7002
Elaine R Neiva, Gardenia Abbad, Maria Inês Gandolfo Conceição, Diana Lúcia Moura Pinho, Andreas Xyrichis
{"title":"一体化是如何定义和衡量的,是什么因素推动了巴西的成功?综合评论。","authors":"Elaine R Neiva,&nbsp;Gardenia Abbad,&nbsp;Maria Inês Gandolfo Conceição,&nbsp;Diana Lúcia Moura Pinho,&nbsp;Andreas Xyrichis","doi":"10.5334/ijic.7002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Integration in health and care can improve quality and outcomes, but it is challenged by expansion of medical knowledge, social pressures on patient needs, and demands to deliver critical information. In Latin American and in other lower and middle-income countries integrated care remains in development. This paper examined the available literature on integrated care to understand how Latin American countries identify and measure integration, and what factors influence success.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This integrative literature review included systematic searches in Global Health, PubMed, SciELO and BVSPsi databases for articles on integrated care in Spanish, Portuguese, and English in the period from January of 1999 to December 2020. The articles were screened for selection and assessed independently by five reviewers that used the inclusion criteria of papers about integration in health care systems. The sample excluded articles that did not deal with the integration of health care, which addressed issues related to public health campaigns, programs to control endemics and epidemics, reports on the experience of implementing health services, health promotion guidelines, food safety, oral health, and books evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>24 articles were included: qualitative (75%), quantitative (12,5%), and mixed-method research (4%) published between 2000 and 2017. All studies were undertaken in Brazil, and two of them were also conducted in Latin American countries. In 15 articles there was an interchangeable use between concepts of integration of services and integrated care, while nine studies did not define integration. Barriers to integration included absence of shared understanding of knowledge among members of interprofessional teams, lack of clarity on professional roles, missing consensus on a definition and measurement of integrated care, power struggles between professionals, poor institutional support, insufficient team preparation and training and unequal valuation of professions by society.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several types of integration and factors contributing to the success of implementation of integrated care in various contexts in Brazil were identified. The concept of integration reflected the varied local and regional realities including different health settings and levels of health and care, suggesting a need for further clarifications on its objective and components especially in LMIC contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":14049,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Integrated Care","volume":"23 4","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624152/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How is Integration Defined and Measured, and what Factors Drive Success in Brazil? An Integrative Review.\",\"authors\":\"Elaine R Neiva,&nbsp;Gardenia Abbad,&nbsp;Maria Inês Gandolfo Conceição,&nbsp;Diana Lúcia Moura Pinho,&nbsp;Andreas Xyrichis\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/ijic.7002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Integration in health and care can improve quality and outcomes, but it is challenged by expansion of medical knowledge, social pressures on patient needs, and demands to deliver critical information. In Latin American and in other lower and middle-income countries integrated care remains in development. This paper examined the available literature on integrated care to understand how Latin American countries identify and measure integration, and what factors influence success.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This integrative literature review included systematic searches in Global Health, PubMed, SciELO and BVSPsi databases for articles on integrated care in Spanish, Portuguese, and English in the period from January of 1999 to December 2020. The articles were screened for selection and assessed independently by five reviewers that used the inclusion criteria of papers about integration in health care systems. The sample excluded articles that did not deal with the integration of health care, which addressed issues related to public health campaigns, programs to control endemics and epidemics, reports on the experience of implementing health services, health promotion guidelines, food safety, oral health, and books evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>24 articles were included: qualitative (75%), quantitative (12,5%), and mixed-method research (4%) published between 2000 and 2017. All studies were undertaken in Brazil, and two of them were also conducted in Latin American countries. In 15 articles there was an interchangeable use between concepts of integration of services and integrated care, while nine studies did not define integration. Barriers to integration included absence of shared understanding of knowledge among members of interprofessional teams, lack of clarity on professional roles, missing consensus on a definition and measurement of integrated care, power struggles between professionals, poor institutional support, insufficient team preparation and training and unequal valuation of professions by society.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several types of integration and factors contributing to the success of implementation of integrated care in various contexts in Brazil were identified. The concept of integration reflected the varied local and regional realities including different health settings and levels of health and care, suggesting a need for further clarifications on its objective and components especially in LMIC contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Integrated Care\",\"volume\":\"23 4\",\"pages\":\"9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624152/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Integrated Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.7002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.7002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:医疗保健一体化可以提高质量和结果,但它受到医学知识扩展、患者需求的社会压力以及提供关键信息的需求的挑战。在拉丁美洲和其他中低收入国家,综合护理仍在发展中。本文研究了现有的综合护理文献,以了解拉丁美洲国家如何识别和衡量综合护理,以及哪些因素影响成功。方法:本综合文献综述包括1999年1月至2020年12月期间在Global Health、PubMed、SciELO和BVSPsi数据库中以西班牙语、葡萄牙语和英语系统搜索关于综合护理的文章。这些文章由五位评审员进行筛选和独立评估,他们使用了关于医疗保健系统整合的论文的纳入标准。样本排除了不涉及医疗保健一体化的文章,这些文章涉及与公共卫生运动、控制地方病和流行病的计划、实施卫生服务的经验报告、健康促进指南、食品安全、口腔健康和书籍评估有关的问题。结果:包括24篇文章:2000年至2017年间发表的定性(75%)、定量(12.5%)和混合方法研究(4%)。所有研究都在巴西进行,其中两项研究也在拉丁美洲国家进行。在15篇文章中,服务一体化和综合护理的概念可以互换使用,而9项研究没有定义一体化。融合的障碍包括跨专业团队成员之间缺乏对知识的共同理解,对专业角色缺乏明确性,对综合护理的定义和衡量缺乏共识,专业人员之间的权力斗争,机构支持不力,团队准备和培训不足,社会对专业的评价不平等。结论:确定了巴西在各种情况下成功实施综合护理的几种类型和因素。一体化概念反映了不同的地方和区域现实,包括不同的卫生环境和卫生保健水平,这表明需要进一步澄清其目标和组成部分,特别是在LMIC背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How is Integration Defined and Measured, and what Factors Drive Success in Brazil? An Integrative Review.

Introduction: Integration in health and care can improve quality and outcomes, but it is challenged by expansion of medical knowledge, social pressures on patient needs, and demands to deliver critical information. In Latin American and in other lower and middle-income countries integrated care remains in development. This paper examined the available literature on integrated care to understand how Latin American countries identify and measure integration, and what factors influence success.

Methods: This integrative literature review included systematic searches in Global Health, PubMed, SciELO and BVSPsi databases for articles on integrated care in Spanish, Portuguese, and English in the period from January of 1999 to December 2020. The articles were screened for selection and assessed independently by five reviewers that used the inclusion criteria of papers about integration in health care systems. The sample excluded articles that did not deal with the integration of health care, which addressed issues related to public health campaigns, programs to control endemics and epidemics, reports on the experience of implementing health services, health promotion guidelines, food safety, oral health, and books evaluation.

Results: 24 articles were included: qualitative (75%), quantitative (12,5%), and mixed-method research (4%) published between 2000 and 2017. All studies were undertaken in Brazil, and two of them were also conducted in Latin American countries. In 15 articles there was an interchangeable use between concepts of integration of services and integrated care, while nine studies did not define integration. Barriers to integration included absence of shared understanding of knowledge among members of interprofessional teams, lack of clarity on professional roles, missing consensus on a definition and measurement of integrated care, power struggles between professionals, poor institutional support, insufficient team preparation and training and unequal valuation of professions by society.

Conclusion: Several types of integration and factors contributing to the success of implementation of integrated care in various contexts in Brazil were identified. The concept of integration reflected the varied local and regional realities including different health settings and levels of health and care, suggesting a need for further clarifications on its objective and components especially in LMIC contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Integrated Care
International Journal of Integrated Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
887
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 2000, IJIC’s mission is to promote integrated care as a scientific discipline. IJIC’s primary purpose is to examine critically the policy and practice of integrated care and whether and how this has impacted on quality-of-care, user experiences, and cost-effectiveness. The journal regularly publishes conference supplements and special themed editions. To find out more contact Managing Editor, Susan Royer. The Journal is supported by the International Foundation for Integrated Care (IFIC).
期刊最新文献
Lessons Learned From the Implementation of an Integrated Health and Social Care Child and Family Hub - a Case Study. Examining Macro-Level Barriers and Facilitators to Scaling Up Integrated Care from a Complexity Perspective: A Multi-Case Study of Cambodia, Slovenia, and Belgium. Process Evaluations for the Scale-Up of Complex Interventions - a Scoping Review. Cost of "Ideal Minimum Integrated Care" for Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertension Patients in Cambodia Context: Provider Perspective. Addressing Child and Adolescent Mental Health Problems in the Community. Evaluation of a Consultation and Advise Team for Assessment, Support and Referral.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1