PRO-SELF癌症疼痛控制方案对患者自我管理能力的影响。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal of Integrated Care Pub Date : 2023-10-30 eCollection Date: 2023-10-01 DOI:10.5334/ijic.7543
Xin Yin, Zi-Jing Chu, Yuan-Yuan Ni, Hong-Wei Li, Hong-Yan Li
{"title":"PRO-SELF癌症疼痛控制方案对患者自我管理能力的影响。","authors":"Xin Yin,&nbsp;Zi-Jing Chu,&nbsp;Yuan-Yuan Ni,&nbsp;Hong-Wei Li,&nbsp;Hong-Yan Li","doi":"10.5334/ijic.7543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recently, cancer patients have challenges with self-management. This study aims to improve symptoms of chronic pain, and anxiety and depression associated with cancer by PRO-SELF nursing intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-four patients were randomly assigned to an intervention and a control group from Jan 2016 to Dec 2019, 34 usable cases in the intervention group and 30 cases in the control group were collected. The control group received a routine cancer pain nursing intervention, whereas the intervention group received a PRO-SELF based multidisciplinary collaborative cancer pain nursing intervention. After three months of intervention, the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Medication Compliance Questionnaire (MCQ), Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS), Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), Quality of Life Scale (FACT-G Chinese version) and Chronic Pain Self-efficacy Scale were resent to compare the differences in the observation indicators included evaluation of patients' social support degree, anxiety and depression score, quality of life scores and self-efficacy scores between two groups. The t-test and rank-sum test were used for statistic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found between groups for pain and medication compliance (P > 0.05). However, significant differences were found between groups in social support, life quality, chronic pain self-efficacy, and self-rating anxiety and depression index scores (P < 0.001). The intervention group report more social support, pain self-efficacy and less anxiety and depression (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PRO-SELF pain symptoms in patients with a cancer pain management programme improved degree of social support, life quality, self-efficacy, anxiety, depression which is worthy of clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":14049,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Integrated Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624132/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Influence of PRO-SELF Cancer Pain Control Programme on Patients' Self-Management Ability.\",\"authors\":\"Xin Yin,&nbsp;Zi-Jing Chu,&nbsp;Yuan-Yuan Ni,&nbsp;Hong-Wei Li,&nbsp;Hong-Yan Li\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/ijic.7543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recently, cancer patients have challenges with self-management. This study aims to improve symptoms of chronic pain, and anxiety and depression associated with cancer by PRO-SELF nursing intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-four patients were randomly assigned to an intervention and a control group from Jan 2016 to Dec 2019, 34 usable cases in the intervention group and 30 cases in the control group were collected. The control group received a routine cancer pain nursing intervention, whereas the intervention group received a PRO-SELF based multidisciplinary collaborative cancer pain nursing intervention. After three months of intervention, the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Medication Compliance Questionnaire (MCQ), Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS), Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), Quality of Life Scale (FACT-G Chinese version) and Chronic Pain Self-efficacy Scale were resent to compare the differences in the observation indicators included evaluation of patients' social support degree, anxiety and depression score, quality of life scores and self-efficacy scores between two groups. The t-test and rank-sum test were used for statistic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found between groups for pain and medication compliance (P > 0.05). However, significant differences were found between groups in social support, life quality, chronic pain self-efficacy, and self-rating anxiety and depression index scores (P < 0.001). The intervention group report more social support, pain self-efficacy and less anxiety and depression (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PRO-SELF pain symptoms in patients with a cancer pain management programme improved degree of social support, life quality, self-efficacy, anxiety, depression which is worthy of clinical application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Integrated Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624132/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Integrated Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.7543\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.7543","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:近年来癌症患者自我管理面临挑战。本研究旨在通过PRO-SELF护理干预改善癌症患者的慢性疼痛、焦虑和抑郁症状。方法:将64名患者从2016年1月至2019年12月随机分为干预组和对照组,收集干预组34例可用病例和对照组30例可用病例。对照组接受常规癌症疼痛护理干预,而干预组接受基于PRO-SELF的多学科协作癌症疼痛护理干预。干预三个月后,采用数字量表(NRS)、药物依从性问卷(MCQ)、社会支持量表(SSRS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量量表(SDS),采用生活质量量表(FACT-G中文版)和慢性疼痛自我效能感量表,比较两组患者社会支持程度、焦虑抑郁评分、生活质量评分和自我效能感评分等观察指标的差异。采用t检验和秩和检验进行统计分析。结果:两组在疼痛和药物依从性方面无显著差异(P>0.05)。但在社会支持、生活质量、慢性疼痛自我效能感、焦虑抑郁自评指数得分等方面存在显著差异(P<0.001)。干预组报告的社会支持更多,结论:PRO-self疼痛症状改善癌症疼痛管理方案患者的社会支持程度、生活质量、自我效能、焦虑、抑郁程度,值得临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Influence of PRO-SELF Cancer Pain Control Programme on Patients' Self-Management Ability.

Objective: Recently, cancer patients have challenges with self-management. This study aims to improve symptoms of chronic pain, and anxiety and depression associated with cancer by PRO-SELF nursing intervention.

Methods: Sixty-four patients were randomly assigned to an intervention and a control group from Jan 2016 to Dec 2019, 34 usable cases in the intervention group and 30 cases in the control group were collected. The control group received a routine cancer pain nursing intervention, whereas the intervention group received a PRO-SELF based multidisciplinary collaborative cancer pain nursing intervention. After three months of intervention, the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Medication Compliance Questionnaire (MCQ), Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS), Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), Quality of Life Scale (FACT-G Chinese version) and Chronic Pain Self-efficacy Scale were resent to compare the differences in the observation indicators included evaluation of patients' social support degree, anxiety and depression score, quality of life scores and self-efficacy scores between two groups. The t-test and rank-sum test were used for statistic analysis.

Results: No significant differences were found between groups for pain and medication compliance (P > 0.05). However, significant differences were found between groups in social support, life quality, chronic pain self-efficacy, and self-rating anxiety and depression index scores (P < 0.001). The intervention group report more social support, pain self-efficacy and less anxiety and depression (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The PRO-SELF pain symptoms in patients with a cancer pain management programme improved degree of social support, life quality, self-efficacy, anxiety, depression which is worthy of clinical application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Integrated Care
International Journal of Integrated Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
887
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 2000, IJIC’s mission is to promote integrated care as a scientific discipline. IJIC’s primary purpose is to examine critically the policy and practice of integrated care and whether and how this has impacted on quality-of-care, user experiences, and cost-effectiveness. The journal regularly publishes conference supplements and special themed editions. To find out more contact Managing Editor, Susan Royer. The Journal is supported by the International Foundation for Integrated Care (IFIC).
期刊最新文献
The Rutgers Integrated Care Evaluation (RICE) Research Framework: An Innovative and Rigorous Set of Methods to Evaluate Integrated Care Programs. Reimagining Day Rehabilitation For Frailty and Neurodegenerative Conditions through the integrated Rehabilitation and EnAblement Program (iREAP). Integrated Diagnosis in Africa's Low- and Middle-Income Countries: What Is It, What Works, and for Whom? A Realist Synthesis. Scale-Up of Integrated Care Interventions for Chronic Diseases in Diverse Settings. Assessing the Strengths and Weaknesses for Implementing a Place-Based Model of Care for Older People on the Central Coast, Australia: Results of a Pilot Project Using the Population Health Management Maturity Index (PHM-MI) Tool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1