物理医学和康复中鞘内巴氯芬泵管理的模拟掌握学习:一项初步研究。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION PM&R Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-26 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13101
Emily Kivlehan, Dana Branch, Christopher Reger, Ana-Marie Rojas
{"title":"物理医学和康复中鞘内巴氯芬泵管理的模拟掌握学习:一项初步研究。","authors":"Emily Kivlehan, Dana Branch, Christopher Reger, Ana-Marie Rojas","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) has demonstrated superiority as a procedural learning method. Implementation of SBML in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R) education has not been described and there is a paucity of literature regarding standardized procedural learning in this specialty.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate if implementation of intrathecal baclofen pump management SBML affects knowledge, attitudes, and skills in PM&R residents.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Pretest-posttest design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic rehabilitation hospital.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Twenty-two PM&R residents.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants engaged in SBML steps: pre-test, demonstration of proper technique, deliberate practice, and a post-test.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Ability to achieve minimum passing score, quiz scores, and survey scores. Pre- and post-test results were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Post graduate year (PGY)-3 and PGY-4 resident results were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on institutional expert consensus, a simulation procedural checklist was created with a minimum passing score set at correctly performing 30 of 31 items. On pre-test, no learners achieved the minimum passing score (22.5, interquartile range [IQR] 17.0-23.0). Initial post-test score for all learners was 30 (IQR 29.8-31.0). Six learners required additional attempts to reach mastery as defined by reaching the minimum passing score. Quiz scores significantly improved from 9 to 11 (pre-test IQR 9-10; post-test IQR 10-11; p < .05). Confidence in procedure significantly improved (pre-test 2.7/5.9, IQR 2.2-3.8; post-test 4.1/5.0, IQR 3.7-4.5; p < .01). Likelihood to perform procedure in future practice did not change (pre-test 2.2, IQR 1.0-3.8; post-test 3.0, IQR 1.0-4.0; p = .89).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SBML is an effective tool to improve multiple domains of learning in PM&R residents.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":"732-737"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulation-based mastery learning for intrathecal baclofen pump management in physical medicine and rehabilitation: A pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Kivlehan, Dana Branch, Christopher Reger, Ana-Marie Rojas\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pmrj.13101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) has demonstrated superiority as a procedural learning method. Implementation of SBML in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R) education has not been described and there is a paucity of literature regarding standardized procedural learning in this specialty.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate if implementation of intrathecal baclofen pump management SBML affects knowledge, attitudes, and skills in PM&R residents.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Pretest-posttest design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic rehabilitation hospital.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Twenty-two PM&R residents.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants engaged in SBML steps: pre-test, demonstration of proper technique, deliberate practice, and a post-test.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Ability to achieve minimum passing score, quiz scores, and survey scores. Pre- and post-test results were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Post graduate year (PGY)-3 and PGY-4 resident results were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on institutional expert consensus, a simulation procedural checklist was created with a minimum passing score set at correctly performing 30 of 31 items. On pre-test, no learners achieved the minimum passing score (22.5, interquartile range [IQR] 17.0-23.0). Initial post-test score for all learners was 30 (IQR 29.8-31.0). Six learners required additional attempts to reach mastery as defined by reaching the minimum passing score. Quiz scores significantly improved from 9 to 11 (pre-test IQR 9-10; post-test IQR 10-11; p < .05). Confidence in procedure significantly improved (pre-test 2.7/5.9, IQR 2.2-3.8; post-test 4.1/5.0, IQR 3.7-4.5; p < .01). Likelihood to perform procedure in future practice did not change (pre-test 2.2, IQR 1.0-3.8; post-test 3.0, IQR 1.0-4.0; p = .89).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SBML is an effective tool to improve multiple domains of learning in PM&R residents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PM&R\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"732-737\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PM&R\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13101\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:基于模拟的掌握学习(SBML)作为一种程序性学习方法已显示出优越性。SBML在物理医学和康复(PM&R)教育中的实施尚未得到描述,也缺乏关于该专业标准化程序学习的文献。目的:评估鞘内巴氯芬泵管理SBML的实施是否会影响PM&R住院患者的知识、态度和技能。设计:测试前-测试后设计。设置:学术康复医院。参与者:22人 PM&R居民。干预措施:参与者参与SBML步骤:测试前、正确技术演示、深思熟虑的练习和测试后。主要结果指标:达到最低通过分数、测验分数和调查分数的能力。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较测试前和测试后的结果。使用Mann-Whitney U检验比较PGY-3和PGY-4住院结果。结果:基于机构专家的共识,创建了一个模拟程序检查表,最低通过分数设置为正确执行31个项目中的30个。在测试前,没有任何学习者达到最低及格分数(22.5[IQR 17.0-23.0])。所有学习者的测试后初始分数为30[IQR 29.8-31.0]。六名学习者需要额外尝试才能达到最低及格分所定义的精通程度。测验成绩从9分显著提高到11分(测试前IQR 9-10;测试后IQR 10-11;p 结论:SBML是改善PM&R居民多领域学习的有效工具。这篇文章受版权保护。保留所有权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Simulation-based mastery learning for intrathecal baclofen pump management in physical medicine and rehabilitation: A pilot study.

Background: Simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) has demonstrated superiority as a procedural learning method. Implementation of SBML in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R) education has not been described and there is a paucity of literature regarding standardized procedural learning in this specialty.

Objective: To evaluate if implementation of intrathecal baclofen pump management SBML affects knowledge, attitudes, and skills in PM&R residents.

Design: Pretest-posttest design.

Setting: Academic rehabilitation hospital.

Participants: Twenty-two PM&R residents.

Interventions: Participants engaged in SBML steps: pre-test, demonstration of proper technique, deliberate practice, and a post-test.

Main outcome measures: Ability to achieve minimum passing score, quiz scores, and survey scores. Pre- and post-test results were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Post graduate year (PGY)-3 and PGY-4 resident results were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results: Based on institutional expert consensus, a simulation procedural checklist was created with a minimum passing score set at correctly performing 30 of 31 items. On pre-test, no learners achieved the minimum passing score (22.5, interquartile range [IQR] 17.0-23.0). Initial post-test score for all learners was 30 (IQR 29.8-31.0). Six learners required additional attempts to reach mastery as defined by reaching the minimum passing score. Quiz scores significantly improved from 9 to 11 (pre-test IQR 9-10; post-test IQR 10-11; p < .05). Confidence in procedure significantly improved (pre-test 2.7/5.9, IQR 2.2-3.8; post-test 4.1/5.0, IQR 3.7-4.5; p < .01). Likelihood to perform procedure in future practice did not change (pre-test 2.2, IQR 1.0-3.8; post-test 3.0, IQR 1.0-4.0; p = .89).

Conclusion: SBML is an effective tool to improve multiple domains of learning in PM&R residents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
期刊最新文献
Percutaneous ultrasound-guided A1 pulley release utilizing a modified 20-gauge spinal needle. Self-perceived preparedness for practice among graduating physical medicine & rehabilitation residents. Knee joint mechanics during gait after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a partial or full thickness quadriceps tendon autograft at 2 years after surgery. Test Smart, Treat Smart-using clinician feedback to adapt a catheter-associated urinary tract infection intervention for spinal cord injury. Racial disparities in prosthesis use, satisfaction, and physical function in upper limb amputation and the impact of veteran status.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1