Abraham Enyeji, Boubakari Ibrahimou, Noël C Barengo, Gilbert Ramirez, Alejandro Arrieta
{"title":"急性冠状动脉综合征人群心血管健康的种族差异。","authors":"Abraham Enyeji, Boubakari Ibrahimou, Noël C Barengo, Gilbert Ramirez, Alejandro Arrieta","doi":"10.1089/pop.2023.0142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relative distribution of proportions of cardiovascular health (CVH) categories within racial groups has been examined. However, little scientific evidence exists on the gap trend in racial/ethnic disparities in mean CVH score among non-Hispanic (NH) Whites and Blacks. This study examined the trend(s) in the gap(s) in predicted CVH scores between NH Whites and Blacks over 10 years. In a cross-sectional analytical study, 10 years of Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data from 2008 to 2018 were pooled, utilizing multivariate Poisson's regression of CVH metrics on race, while controlling for relevant covariates. The interactions of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with CVH metrics, and other key variables such as trends and grouped Charlson Comorbidity Index allowed for variations in the effect of these variables on the subgroups. The mean gap in CVH scores was on average 0.15 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.137 to 0.170], with Blacks consistently having reduced odds of having ideal CVH until 2014. The overall impact of having an ACS decreased acquired CVH scores by 24.1% [95% CI -0.275 to 0.207], and was equal for both racial subgroups (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The Affordable Care Act (ACA)-trend was positive, increasing the likelihood of improved CVH in the sample (<i>P</i> < 0.05), deflecting a downward trend in acquired CVH scores for both races, as the gap narrowed into more recent years. The CVH gap was stabilized by the ACA, but never really converged, suggesting that efforts to reduce existing disparities between Blacks and NH Whites in the United States would require government policies to look beyond mere \"access\" and/or \"affordability\" to health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":20396,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Management","volume":" ","pages":"378-386"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10698758/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial Disparities in Cardiovascular Health Among the Acute Coronary Syndrome Population.\",\"authors\":\"Abraham Enyeji, Boubakari Ibrahimou, Noël C Barengo, Gilbert Ramirez, Alejandro Arrieta\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/pop.2023.0142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The relative distribution of proportions of cardiovascular health (CVH) categories within racial groups has been examined. However, little scientific evidence exists on the gap trend in racial/ethnic disparities in mean CVH score among non-Hispanic (NH) Whites and Blacks. This study examined the trend(s) in the gap(s) in predicted CVH scores between NH Whites and Blacks over 10 years. In a cross-sectional analytical study, 10 years of Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data from 2008 to 2018 were pooled, utilizing multivariate Poisson's regression of CVH metrics on race, while controlling for relevant covariates. The interactions of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with CVH metrics, and other key variables such as trends and grouped Charlson Comorbidity Index allowed for variations in the effect of these variables on the subgroups. The mean gap in CVH scores was on average 0.15 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.137 to 0.170], with Blacks consistently having reduced odds of having ideal CVH until 2014. The overall impact of having an ACS decreased acquired CVH scores by 24.1% [95% CI -0.275 to 0.207], and was equal for both racial subgroups (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The Affordable Care Act (ACA)-trend was positive, increasing the likelihood of improved CVH in the sample (<i>P</i> < 0.05), deflecting a downward trend in acquired CVH scores for both races, as the gap narrowed into more recent years. The CVH gap was stabilized by the ACA, but never really converged, suggesting that efforts to reduce existing disparities between Blacks and NH Whites in the United States would require government policies to look beyond mere \\\"access\\\" and/or \\\"affordability\\\" to health care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Population Health Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"378-386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10698758/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Population Health Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2023.0142\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2023.0142","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究了种族群体中心血管健康(CVH)类别比例的相对分布。然而,关于非西班牙裔(NH)白人和黑人平均CVH得分的种族/民族差异的差距趋势,几乎没有科学证据。这项研究考察了10年来NH白人和黑人之间预测CVH得分差距的趋势。在一项横断面分析研究中,汇集了2008年至2018年10年的医疗支出小组调查数据,利用种族CVH指标的多变量泊松回归,同时控制相关协变量。急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)与CVH指标以及其他关键变量(如趋势和分组Charlson共病指数)的相互作用允许这些变量对亚组的影响发生变化。CVH得分的平均差距为0.15[95%置信区间(CI)0.137至0.170],直到2014年,黑人获得理想CVH的几率一直在降低。ACS的总体影响使获得性CVH评分降低了24.1%[95%CI-0.275至0.207],两个种族亚组的得分相同(P P
Racial Disparities in Cardiovascular Health Among the Acute Coronary Syndrome Population.
The relative distribution of proportions of cardiovascular health (CVH) categories within racial groups has been examined. However, little scientific evidence exists on the gap trend in racial/ethnic disparities in mean CVH score among non-Hispanic (NH) Whites and Blacks. This study examined the trend(s) in the gap(s) in predicted CVH scores between NH Whites and Blacks over 10 years. In a cross-sectional analytical study, 10 years of Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data from 2008 to 2018 were pooled, utilizing multivariate Poisson's regression of CVH metrics on race, while controlling for relevant covariates. The interactions of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with CVH metrics, and other key variables such as trends and grouped Charlson Comorbidity Index allowed for variations in the effect of these variables on the subgroups. The mean gap in CVH scores was on average 0.15 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.137 to 0.170], with Blacks consistently having reduced odds of having ideal CVH until 2014. The overall impact of having an ACS decreased acquired CVH scores by 24.1% [95% CI -0.275 to 0.207], and was equal for both racial subgroups (P < 0.05). The Affordable Care Act (ACA)-trend was positive, increasing the likelihood of improved CVH in the sample (P < 0.05), deflecting a downward trend in acquired CVH scores for both races, as the gap narrowed into more recent years. The CVH gap was stabilized by the ACA, but never really converged, suggesting that efforts to reduce existing disparities between Blacks and NH Whites in the United States would require government policies to look beyond mere "access" and/or "affordability" to health care.
期刊介绍:
Population Health Management provides comprehensive, authoritative strategies for improving the systems and policies that affect health care quality, access, and outcomes, ultimately improving the health of an entire population. The Journal delivers essential research on a broad range of topics including the impact of social, cultural, economic, and environmental factors on health care systems and practices.
Population Health Management coverage includes:
Clinical case reports and studies on managing major public health conditions
Compliance programs
Health economics
Outcomes assessment
Provider incentives
Health care reform
Resource management
Return on investment (ROI)
Health care quality
Care coordination.