持续用药依从性和生活方式建议依从性对2型糖尿病和晚期动脉粥样硬化患者主要心血管事件和一年死亡率的影响:前瞻性队列研究结果。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Global Heart Pub Date : 2023-11-01 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5334/gh.1273
Evgeniya V Shalaeva, Arjola Bano, Ulugbek Kasimov, Bakhtiyor Janabaev, Markus Laimer, Hugo Saner
{"title":"持续用药依从性和生活方式建议依从性对2型糖尿病和晚期动脉粥样硬化患者主要心血管事件和一年死亡率的影响:前瞻性队列研究结果。","authors":"Evgeniya V Shalaeva, Arjola Bano, Ulugbek Kasimov, Bakhtiyor Janabaev, Markus Laimer, Hugo Saner","doi":"10.5334/gh.1273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of single and combined effects of persistent medication adherence and compliance with lifestyle recommendations on the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and one-year all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and peripheral artery disease (PAD) after partial foot amputation (PFA), representing a unique cohort of patients with advanced stages of atherosclerosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective cohort study of 785 consecutive patients (mean age 60.9 ± 9.1 years; 64.1% males). Medication adherence was evaluated by using the proportion of days covered (PDC) measure calculation and was defined as a PDC ≥80%. It derived as an average of PDCs of the following four classes of drugs: a) antidiabetics (oral hypoglycemic medications and/or insulin); b) ACEI or ARBs; c) Statins; d) antiplatelet drugs. Lifestyle compliance was defined as a PDC ≥80% comprising of PDCs of a) physical activity of ≥30 minutes per day; b) healthy nutrition and weight management; c) non-smoking. Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for confounders were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total all-cause mortality was 16.9% (n = 133) at one-year follow-up. After adjusting for confounders, compared to adherent/compliant patients (n = 432), non-adherent and/or non-compliant patients had an increased risk of one-year mortality: HR = 8.67 (95% CI [5.29, 14.86] in non-adherent/non-compliant patients (n = 184), p < 0.001; HR = 3.81 (95% CI [2.03, 7.12], p < 0.001) in adherent/non-compliant patients (n = 101) and HR = 3.14 (95% CI [1.52, 6.45] p = 0.002) in non-adherent/compliant patients (n = 184). The incidence of MACE followed similar pattern (HR = 9.66 (95% CI [6.55, 14.25] for non-adherence/non-compliance; HR = 3.48 (95% CI [2.09, 5.77] and HR = 3.35 (95% CI [1.89, 5.91], p < 0.001 for single adherence or compliance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medication adherence and compliance to lifestyle recommendations have shown to be equally effective to reduce the incidence of MACE and one-year mortality in patients with diabetes and PAD after PFA representing a population with highly advanced stages of atherosclerotic disease. Our findings underline the necessity to give lifestyle intervention programs a high priority and that costs for secondary prevention medications should be covered for patients under these circumstances.</p><p><strong>Lay summary: </strong>This study analyzed the single and combined effects of medication adherence and compliance with lifestyle recommendations on cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and advances stages of atherosclerosis over a period of one year.Evaluation of medication adherence included antidiabetics, statins, dual antiplatelets and ACEI/ARBs, whereas lifestyle recommendations included healthy nutrition, physical activity and smoking cessation.Persistent medication adherence and lifestyle changes have shown to be equally effective to reduce the incidence of MACE and one-year mortality in patients representing a population with highly advanced stages of atherosclerotic disease, and positive effects added up to a double effect if patients were persistently adherent and compliant with both interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":56018,"journal":{"name":"Global Heart","volume":"18 1","pages":"61"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624143/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Persistent Medication Adherence and Compliance with Lifestyle Recommendations on Major Cardiovascular Events and One-Year Mortality in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Advanced Stages of Atherosclerosis: Results From a Prospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Evgeniya V Shalaeva, Arjola Bano, Ulugbek Kasimov, Bakhtiyor Janabaev, Markus Laimer, Hugo Saner\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/gh.1273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of single and combined effects of persistent medication adherence and compliance with lifestyle recommendations on the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and one-year all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and peripheral artery disease (PAD) after partial foot amputation (PFA), representing a unique cohort of patients with advanced stages of atherosclerosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective cohort study of 785 consecutive patients (mean age 60.9 ± 9.1 years; 64.1% males). Medication adherence was evaluated by using the proportion of days covered (PDC) measure calculation and was defined as a PDC ≥80%. It derived as an average of PDCs of the following four classes of drugs: a) antidiabetics (oral hypoglycemic medications and/or insulin); b) ACEI or ARBs; c) Statins; d) antiplatelet drugs. Lifestyle compliance was defined as a PDC ≥80% comprising of PDCs of a) physical activity of ≥30 minutes per day; b) healthy nutrition and weight management; c) non-smoking. Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for confounders were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total all-cause mortality was 16.9% (n = 133) at one-year follow-up. After adjusting for confounders, compared to adherent/compliant patients (n = 432), non-adherent and/or non-compliant patients had an increased risk of one-year mortality: HR = 8.67 (95% CI [5.29, 14.86] in non-adherent/non-compliant patients (n = 184), p < 0.001; HR = 3.81 (95% CI [2.03, 7.12], p < 0.001) in adherent/non-compliant patients (n = 101) and HR = 3.14 (95% CI [1.52, 6.45] p = 0.002) in non-adherent/compliant patients (n = 184). The incidence of MACE followed similar pattern (HR = 9.66 (95% CI [6.55, 14.25] for non-adherence/non-compliance; HR = 3.48 (95% CI [2.09, 5.77] and HR = 3.35 (95% CI [1.89, 5.91], p < 0.001 for single adherence or compliance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medication adherence and compliance to lifestyle recommendations have shown to be equally effective to reduce the incidence of MACE and one-year mortality in patients with diabetes and PAD after PFA representing a population with highly advanced stages of atherosclerotic disease. Our findings underline the necessity to give lifestyle intervention programs a high priority and that costs for secondary prevention medications should be covered for patients under these circumstances.</p><p><strong>Lay summary: </strong>This study analyzed the single and combined effects of medication adherence and compliance with lifestyle recommendations on cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and advances stages of atherosclerosis over a period of one year.Evaluation of medication adherence included antidiabetics, statins, dual antiplatelets and ACEI/ARBs, whereas lifestyle recommendations included healthy nutrition, physical activity and smoking cessation.Persistent medication adherence and lifestyle changes have shown to be equally effective to reduce the incidence of MACE and one-year mortality in patients representing a population with highly advanced stages of atherosclerotic disease, and positive effects added up to a double effect if patients were persistently adherent and compliant with both interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Heart\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624143/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Heart\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1273\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Heart","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1273","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是评估持续服药和遵守生活方式建议对2型糖尿病(T2D)和外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者部分足截肢(PFA)后主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发生率和一年全因死亡率的单一和联合影响,代表了动脉粥样硬化晚期患者的独特队列。方法:这是一项对785名连续患者(平均年龄60.9±9.1岁;64.1%为男性)的前瞻性队列研究。通过使用覆盖天数比例(PDC)测量计算来评估药物依从性,并将其定义为PDC≥80%。它是以下四类药物的PDCs的平均值:a)抗糖尿病药物(口服降糖药物和/或胰岛素);b) ACEI或ARBs;c) 他汀类药物;d) 抗血小板药物。生活方式依从性定义为PDC≥80%,包括a)每天≥30分钟的体育活动;b) 健康营养和体重管理;c) 禁烟。采用经混杂因素调整的Cox比例风险模型。结果:在一年的随访中,全因死亡率为16.9%(n=133)。在校正混杂因素后,与依从性/依从性患者(n=432)相比,不依从性和/或不依从性患者一年死亡率增加:不依从性/顺应性患者(n=184)的HR=8.67(95%CI[5.29,14.86]),p<0.001;粘附性/不依从性患者(n=101)的HR=3.81(95%CI[2.03,7.12],p<0.001),不粘附性/依从性患者的HR=3.14(95%CI[1.52,6.45],p=0.002)(n=184)。MACE的发生率遵循相似的模式(不依从性/不依从性的HR=9.66(95%CI[6.55,14.25]);HR=3.48(95%CI[2.09,5.77])和HR=3.35(95%CI[1.89,5.91]),对于单一依从性或依从性,p<0.001。结论:药物依从性和对生活方式建议的依从性已被证明在PFA后降低糖尿病和PAD患者的MACE发生率和一年死亡率方面同样有效,PFA代表了动脉粥样硬化疾病的高度晚期人群。我们的研究结果强调,有必要高度重视生活方式干预计划,在这种情况下,二级预防药物的费用应该由患者承担。概述:本研究分析了一年内药物依从性和生活方式建议对2型糖尿病患者心血管事件和死亡率以及动脉粥样硬化进展阶段的单一和综合影响。药物依从性评估包括抗糖尿病药物、他汀类药物、双重抗血小板药物和ACEI/ARBs,而生活方式建议包括健康营养、体育活动和戒烟。在动脉粥样硬化疾病高度晚期人群中,持续的药物依从性和生活方式的改变对降低MACE的发生率和一年死亡率同样有效,如果患者持续依从性并遵守这两种干预措施,则积极影响加起来会产生双重影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Persistent Medication Adherence and Compliance with Lifestyle Recommendations on Major Cardiovascular Events and One-Year Mortality in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Advanced Stages of Atherosclerosis: Results From a Prospective Cohort Study.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of single and combined effects of persistent medication adherence and compliance with lifestyle recommendations on the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and one-year all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and peripheral artery disease (PAD) after partial foot amputation (PFA), representing a unique cohort of patients with advanced stages of atherosclerosis.

Methods: This is a prospective cohort study of 785 consecutive patients (mean age 60.9 ± 9.1 years; 64.1% males). Medication adherence was evaluated by using the proportion of days covered (PDC) measure calculation and was defined as a PDC ≥80%. It derived as an average of PDCs of the following four classes of drugs: a) antidiabetics (oral hypoglycemic medications and/or insulin); b) ACEI or ARBs; c) Statins; d) antiplatelet drugs. Lifestyle compliance was defined as a PDC ≥80% comprising of PDCs of a) physical activity of ≥30 minutes per day; b) healthy nutrition and weight management; c) non-smoking. Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for confounders were used.

Results: Total all-cause mortality was 16.9% (n = 133) at one-year follow-up. After adjusting for confounders, compared to adherent/compliant patients (n = 432), non-adherent and/or non-compliant patients had an increased risk of one-year mortality: HR = 8.67 (95% CI [5.29, 14.86] in non-adherent/non-compliant patients (n = 184), p < 0.001; HR = 3.81 (95% CI [2.03, 7.12], p < 0.001) in adherent/non-compliant patients (n = 101) and HR = 3.14 (95% CI [1.52, 6.45] p = 0.002) in non-adherent/compliant patients (n = 184). The incidence of MACE followed similar pattern (HR = 9.66 (95% CI [6.55, 14.25] for non-adherence/non-compliance; HR = 3.48 (95% CI [2.09, 5.77] and HR = 3.35 (95% CI [1.89, 5.91], p < 0.001 for single adherence or compliance.

Conclusions: Medication adherence and compliance to lifestyle recommendations have shown to be equally effective to reduce the incidence of MACE and one-year mortality in patients with diabetes and PAD after PFA representing a population with highly advanced stages of atherosclerotic disease. Our findings underline the necessity to give lifestyle intervention programs a high priority and that costs for secondary prevention medications should be covered for patients under these circumstances.

Lay summary: This study analyzed the single and combined effects of medication adherence and compliance with lifestyle recommendations on cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and advances stages of atherosclerosis over a period of one year.Evaluation of medication adherence included antidiabetics, statins, dual antiplatelets and ACEI/ARBs, whereas lifestyle recommendations included healthy nutrition, physical activity and smoking cessation.Persistent medication adherence and lifestyle changes have shown to be equally effective to reduce the incidence of MACE and one-year mortality in patients representing a population with highly advanced stages of atherosclerotic disease, and positive effects added up to a double effect if patients were persistently adherent and compliant with both interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Heart
Global Heart Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.40%
发文量
77
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Heart offers a forum for dialogue and education on research, developments, trends, solutions and public health programs related to the prevention and control of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) worldwide, with a special focus on low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Manuscripts should address not only the extent or epidemiology of the problem, but also describe interventions to effectively control and prevent CVDs and the underlying factors. The emphasis should be on approaches applicable in settings with limited resources. Economic evaluations of successful interventions are particularly welcome. We will also consider negative findings if important. While reports of hospital or clinic-based treatments are not excluded, particularly if they have broad implications for cost-effective disease control or prevention, we give priority to papers addressing community-based activities. We encourage submissions on cardiovascular surveillance and health policies, professional education, ethical issues and technological innovations related to prevention. Global Heart is particularly interested in publishing data from updated national or regional demographic health surveys, World Health Organization or Global Burden of Disease data, large clinical disease databases or registries. Systematic reviews or meta-analyses on globally relevant topics are welcome. We will also consider clinical research that has special relevance to LMICs, e.g. using validated instruments to assess health-related quality-of-life in patients from LMICs, innovative diagnostic-therapeutic applications, real-world effectiveness clinical trials, research methods (innovative methodologic papers, with emphasis on low-cost research methods or novel application of methods in low resource settings), and papers pertaining to cardiovascular health promotion and policy (quantitative evaluation of health programs.
期刊最新文献
Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of the Lebanese University Medical Students and Junior Doctors on Basic Life Support Practices. Lessons Learnt from HIV and Noncommunicable Disease Healthcare Integration in Sub-Saharan Africa. Imaging and Circulating Biomarker-Defined Cardiac Pathology in Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review. Causal Links Between Renal Function and Cardiac Structure, Function, and Disease Risk. Clearing the Air to Address Pollution's Cardiovascular Health Crisis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1