工业过程的机器人化:有和没有现有机器人过程的公司之间的动机差异。

Meredith Dentice Johnson, Sigal Berman, Razia Azen, Wilkistar Otieno, Naira Campbell-Kyureghyan
{"title":"工业过程的机器人化:有和没有现有机器人过程的公司之间的动机差异。","authors":"Meredith Dentice Johnson, Sigal Berman, Razia Azen, Wilkistar Otieno, Naira Campbell-Kyureghyan","doi":"10.1080/24725838.2023.2278794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONSOur survey of 100 manufacturing facilities revealed statistically significant differences among company types in their perceptions of cost savings, productivity gains, and safety improvements as benefits of robotic implementation. Regardless of company type or size, indications of presence of cumulative, incidental, and static postural hazards were identified as primary perceived factors for injury potential. More than half of the surveyed companies reported being unaware of general safety standards utilized within their facilities, and most (70%) robotic companies were unaware of any robotic-specific standards utilized at their company. Our results indicate the importance of accounting for varying perspectives between company types regarding motivation for and safety impacts of robotics. With the advancement of technology and robotization of the manufacturing industry, there are also pressing needs for advancing robotic safety standards, implementing training programs, and continuous promotion of the general safety awareness.</p>","PeriodicalId":73332,"journal":{"name":"IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","volume":" ","pages":"41-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robotization of Industrial Processes: Motivational Differences between Companies with and without Existing Robotic Processes.\",\"authors\":\"Meredith Dentice Johnson, Sigal Berman, Razia Azen, Wilkistar Otieno, Naira Campbell-Kyureghyan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24725838.2023.2278794\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONSOur survey of 100 manufacturing facilities revealed statistically significant differences among company types in their perceptions of cost savings, productivity gains, and safety improvements as benefits of robotic implementation. Regardless of company type or size, indications of presence of cumulative, incidental, and static postural hazards were identified as primary perceived factors for injury potential. More than half of the surveyed companies reported being unaware of general safety standards utilized within their facilities, and most (70%) robotic companies were unaware of any robotic-specific standards utilized at their company. Our results indicate the importance of accounting for varying perspectives between company types regarding motivation for and safety impacts of robotics. With the advancement of technology and robotization of the manufacturing industry, there are also pressing needs for advancing robotic safety standards, implementing training programs, and continuous promotion of the general safety awareness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"41-54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2023.2278794\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2023.2278794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:将机器人技术引入工业过程通常被认为可以提高生产力,降低成本,改善职业健康和安全。这些预期收益被认为会推动公司实现制造过程自动化的动机。目的:机器人可能会造成与体力劳动不同的危险,说明它们有可能积极改变公司的安全结果。然而,我们的文献综述发现,很少有研究表明公司选择使用工业机器人的驱动因素。此外,激励因素如何因公司类型或规模而不同的问题尚未得到充分探讨。方法:我们调查了机器人化动机的差异,重点是已经拥有机器人流程的公司(机器人公司)和没有当前机器人安装的公司(非机器人)的安全相关问题。对于后者,计划在未来获得机器人的公司和不计划这样做的公司之间进行了更精细的区分。分发了一份定制设计和验证的调查,并从普通制造业的100家公司(其中52家目前使用机器人)收集了数据。结果:我们发现,机器人公司、计划获得机器人技术的公司和不计划获得机器人的公司在动机因素方面存在统计学上的显著差异。经济方面是所有公司类型的最大理由。识别了机器人公司和非机器人公司之间感知到的安全隐患和伤害类型的差异。机器人展示了减少某些危险类型的潜力,但如果实施不当,也会对员工造成伤害。结论:无论其规模或地理位置如何,拥有和不拥有现有机器人流程的公司对工业流程机器人化的动机和安全影响的看法不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Robotization of Industrial Processes: Motivational Differences between Companies with and without Existing Robotic Processes.

OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONSOur survey of 100 manufacturing facilities revealed statistically significant differences among company types in their perceptions of cost savings, productivity gains, and safety improvements as benefits of robotic implementation. Regardless of company type or size, indications of presence of cumulative, incidental, and static postural hazards were identified as primary perceived factors for injury potential. More than half of the surveyed companies reported being unaware of general safety standards utilized within their facilities, and most (70%) robotic companies were unaware of any robotic-specific standards utilized at their company. Our results indicate the importance of accounting for varying perspectives between company types regarding motivation for and safety impacts of robotics. With the advancement of technology and robotization of the manufacturing industry, there are also pressing needs for advancing robotic safety standards, implementing training programs, and continuous promotion of the general safety awareness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring Team Dynamics in Virtual Reality Environments. An Iterative Design Method for Advancing Air Traffic Control and Management Training Through Immersive VFR 3D Map Visualization. Wearable Technology Hesitancy in Industrial Applications. Investigating Safety Awareness in Assembly Operations via Mixed Reality Technology. Strategies to Reduce Fall Severity after a Perturbation during Ladder Climbing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1