快速AST:推断具有复杂表型的抗性机制的可能性。

J Ligero-López, I Falces-Romero, A Aranda-Díaz, D García-Ballesteros, J García-Rodríguez, E Cendejas-Bueno
{"title":"快速AST:推断具有复杂表型的抗性机制的可能性。","authors":"J Ligero-López, I Falces-Romero, A Aranda-Díaz, D García-Ballesteros, J García-Rodríguez, E Cendejas-Bueno","doi":"10.37201/req/043.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The new automated systems designed for rapid performance of AST have significantly reduced the response time for susceptibility testing of microorganisms causing bacteremia and sepsis. The Accelerate Pheno® system (AAC) is one such system. Our objective for this study was to determine whether the AAC system is capable of providing an accurate susceptibility profile to infer resistance mechanisms in different carbapenemase-producing isolates when compared to the MicroScan WalkAway System (MWS). Disk diffusion method was also performed on all isolates as a reference method. Additionally, we compared the results obtained with the routine AST production system. We selected 19 isolates from the cryobank of the Microbiology department, all of which were carbapenemase-producing gram-negative bacilli. AAC was able to identify and infer the resistance of a total of 10 isolates, with an EA and CA of 84.2% for meropenem and 88.2% and 64.7% for ertapenem EA and CA, respectively. If we consider the disk diffusion technique, the CA was 57.9% and 76.5% for meropenem and ertapenem. However, in the presence of carbapenemases, AAC was not able to provide adequate MICs or infer the resistance mechanisms of the isolates accurately. Further studies with a larger number of isolates, including the new antibiotics ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam, are needed for a more comprehensive comparison.</p>","PeriodicalId":94198,"journal":{"name":"Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia","volume":" ","pages":"88-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10874663/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rapid AST: Possibility of inferring resistance mechanisms with complex phenotypes.\",\"authors\":\"J Ligero-López, I Falces-Romero, A Aranda-Díaz, D García-Ballesteros, J García-Rodríguez, E Cendejas-Bueno\",\"doi\":\"10.37201/req/043.2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The new automated systems designed for rapid performance of AST have significantly reduced the response time for susceptibility testing of microorganisms causing bacteremia and sepsis. The Accelerate Pheno® system (AAC) is one such system. Our objective for this study was to determine whether the AAC system is capable of providing an accurate susceptibility profile to infer resistance mechanisms in different carbapenemase-producing isolates when compared to the MicroScan WalkAway System (MWS). Disk diffusion method was also performed on all isolates as a reference method. Additionally, we compared the results obtained with the routine AST production system. We selected 19 isolates from the cryobank of the Microbiology department, all of which were carbapenemase-producing gram-negative bacilli. AAC was able to identify and infer the resistance of a total of 10 isolates, with an EA and CA of 84.2% for meropenem and 88.2% and 64.7% for ertapenem EA and CA, respectively. If we consider the disk diffusion technique, the CA was 57.9% and 76.5% for meropenem and ertapenem. However, in the presence of carbapenemases, AAC was not able to provide adequate MICs or infer the resistance mechanisms of the isolates accurately. Further studies with a larger number of isolates, including the new antibiotics ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam, are needed for a more comprehensive comparison.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"88-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10874663/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37201/req/043.2023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37201/req/043.2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为快速检测AST而设计的新型自动化系统显著缩短了引起菌血症和败血症的微生物易感性测试的响应时间。Accelerate Pheno®系统(AAC)就是这样一个系统。本研究的目的是确定与MicroScan WalkAway系统(MWS)相比,AAC系统是否能够提供准确的易感性图谱,以推断不同碳青霉烯酶产生菌株的耐药性机制。还对所有分离物进行了盘扩散法作为参考方法。此外,我们还将所获得的结果与常规AST生产系统进行了比较。我们从微生物部门的冷冻库中选择了19个分离株,它们都是产碳青霉烯酶的革兰氏阴性杆菌。AAC能够鉴定和推断总共10个分离株的耐药性,对美罗培南的EA和CA分别为84.2%和88.2%和64.7%。如果考虑圆盘扩散技术,美罗培南和厄他培南的CA分别为57.9%和76.5%。然而,在碳青霉烯酶存在的情况下,AAC无法提供足够的MIC或准确推断分离株的抗性机制。需要对更多的分离株进行进一步的研究,包括新的抗生素头孢托洛赞/他唑巴坦和头孢他啶/阿维巴坦,以进行更全面的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rapid AST: Possibility of inferring resistance mechanisms with complex phenotypes.

The new automated systems designed for rapid performance of AST have significantly reduced the response time for susceptibility testing of microorganisms causing bacteremia and sepsis. The Accelerate Pheno® system (AAC) is one such system. Our objective for this study was to determine whether the AAC system is capable of providing an accurate susceptibility profile to infer resistance mechanisms in different carbapenemase-producing isolates when compared to the MicroScan WalkAway System (MWS). Disk diffusion method was also performed on all isolates as a reference method. Additionally, we compared the results obtained with the routine AST production system. We selected 19 isolates from the cryobank of the Microbiology department, all of which were carbapenemase-producing gram-negative bacilli. AAC was able to identify and infer the resistance of a total of 10 isolates, with an EA and CA of 84.2% for meropenem and 88.2% and 64.7% for ertapenem EA and CA, respectively. If we consider the disk diffusion technique, the CA was 57.9% and 76.5% for meropenem and ertapenem. However, in the presence of carbapenemases, AAC was not able to provide adequate MICs or infer the resistance mechanisms of the isolates accurately. Further studies with a larger number of isolates, including the new antibiotics ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam, are needed for a more comprehensive comparison.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Human intestinal microbiome: Role in health and disease. [Impact in the adult population of immunization with nirsevimab in children under 6 months of age against respiratory syncytial virus]. Invasive group A Streptococcus infection (Streptococcus pyogenes): Current situation in Spain. [Nirsevimab effectiveness against hospital admission for respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis in infants]. A 5-year study of bloodstream infections caused by carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacilli in southern Spain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1