Dulce Mariel Ruiz-Sánchez, Daniela Rivero-Yeverino, José Sergio Papaqui-Tapia, Chrystopherson Gengyny Caballero-López, Aida Inés López-García, Juan Jesús Rios-López, Edgar Flores-Gonzaga, Erika Villada-Villada
{"title":"[立即对青霉素过敏的体内诊断测试:初步研究]。","authors":"Dulce Mariel Ruiz-Sánchez, Daniela Rivero-Yeverino, José Sergio Papaqui-Tapia, Chrystopherson Gengyny Caballero-López, Aida Inés López-García, Juan Jesús Rios-López, Edgar Flores-Gonzaga, Erika Villada-Villada","doi":"10.29262/ram.v70i3.1254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The most commonly reported antibiotic allergy is penicillin. The false label of \"allergy\" to penicillin negatively affects the patient's quality of life and medical care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the frequency of allergy to penicillin and amoxicillin by in vivo exposure tests in patients with a history of immediate reaction to this class of medicinal products.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational, cross-sectional, descriptive and prolective study in patients between 12 and 60 years of age with a history of immediate reaction to penicillin and/or amoxicillin. Prick and intradermal skin tests were performed with benzylpenicilloyl polylysine (Pre-Pen), penicillin G and oral challenge test with amoxicillin. The frequency of positivity and negativity in these tests was calculated with a 95% CI. Results were analyzed in Epi info 7.2.5.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 13 patients (10 women) were included, with a mean age of 39 years (SD 12.14). In 84.6% the last adverse drug reaction occurred 10 years ago and in all manifested with urticaria. The 38.4% confirmed penicillin allergy and the most frequent adverse reaction after in vivo tests was pruritus.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The clinical history alone is not sufficient, all patients with suspected penicillin allergy should be evaluated by in vivo exposure tests with major and minor determinants to corroborate or rule out allergy to this pharmacological class.</p>","PeriodicalId":101421,"journal":{"name":"Revista alergia Mexico (Tecamachalco, Puebla, Mexico : 1993)","volume":"70 4","pages":"205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Pruebas diagnósticas in vivo en alergia inmediata a penicilina: estudio piloto].\",\"authors\":\"Dulce Mariel Ruiz-Sánchez, Daniela Rivero-Yeverino, José Sergio Papaqui-Tapia, Chrystopherson Gengyny Caballero-López, Aida Inés López-García, Juan Jesús Rios-López, Edgar Flores-Gonzaga, Erika Villada-Villada\",\"doi\":\"10.29262/ram.v70i3.1254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The most commonly reported antibiotic allergy is penicillin. The false label of \\\"allergy\\\" to penicillin negatively affects the patient's quality of life and medical care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the frequency of allergy to penicillin and amoxicillin by in vivo exposure tests in patients with a history of immediate reaction to this class of medicinal products.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational, cross-sectional, descriptive and prolective study in patients between 12 and 60 years of age with a history of immediate reaction to penicillin and/or amoxicillin. Prick and intradermal skin tests were performed with benzylpenicilloyl polylysine (Pre-Pen), penicillin G and oral challenge test with amoxicillin. The frequency of positivity and negativity in these tests was calculated with a 95% CI. Results were analyzed in Epi info 7.2.5.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 13 patients (10 women) were included, with a mean age of 39 years (SD 12.14). In 84.6% the last adverse drug reaction occurred 10 years ago and in all manifested with urticaria. The 38.4% confirmed penicillin allergy and the most frequent adverse reaction after in vivo tests was pruritus.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The clinical history alone is not sufficient, all patients with suspected penicillin allergy should be evaluated by in vivo exposure tests with major and minor determinants to corroborate or rule out allergy to this pharmacological class.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista alergia Mexico (Tecamachalco, Puebla, Mexico : 1993)\",\"volume\":\"70 4\",\"pages\":\"205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista alergia Mexico (Tecamachalco, Puebla, Mexico : 1993)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29262/ram.v70i3.1254\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista alergia Mexico (Tecamachalco, Puebla, Mexico : 1993)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29262/ram.v70i3.1254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:最常见的抗生素过敏报告是青霉素。对青霉素“过敏”的错误标签会对患者的生活质量和医疗保健产生负面影响。目的:通过体内暴露试验确定对青霉素和阿莫西林有直接反应史的患者对这类药物过敏的频率。方法:对12至60岁有青霉素和/或阿莫西林直接反应史的患者进行观察、横断面、描述性和前瞻性研究。用苄基青霉素酰聚赖氨酸(Pre-Pen)、青霉素G进行皮内和皮内皮肤试验,用阿莫西林进行口服激发试验。这些测试中阳性和阴性的频率用95%的CI计算。结果在Epi info 7.2.5.0中进行分析。结果:总共包括13名患者(10名女性),平均年龄39岁(SD 12.14)。84.6%的患者最后一次药物不良反应发生在10年前,所有患者均表现为荨麻疹。38.4%的患者证实青霉素过敏,体内试验后最常见的不良反应是瘙痒。结论:仅凭临床病史是不够的,所有怀疑青霉素过敏的患者都应该通过体内暴露试验进行评估,包括主要和次要的决定因素,以证实或排除对该药物类别的过敏。
[Pruebas diagnósticas in vivo en alergia inmediata a penicilina: estudio piloto].
Background: The most commonly reported antibiotic allergy is penicillin. The false label of "allergy" to penicillin negatively affects the patient's quality of life and medical care.
Objective: To determine the frequency of allergy to penicillin and amoxicillin by in vivo exposure tests in patients with a history of immediate reaction to this class of medicinal products.
Methods: Observational, cross-sectional, descriptive and prolective study in patients between 12 and 60 years of age with a history of immediate reaction to penicillin and/or amoxicillin. Prick and intradermal skin tests were performed with benzylpenicilloyl polylysine (Pre-Pen), penicillin G and oral challenge test with amoxicillin. The frequency of positivity and negativity in these tests was calculated with a 95% CI. Results were analyzed in Epi info 7.2.5.0.
Results: In total 13 patients (10 women) were included, with a mean age of 39 years (SD 12.14). In 84.6% the last adverse drug reaction occurred 10 years ago and in all manifested with urticaria. The 38.4% confirmed penicillin allergy and the most frequent adverse reaction after in vivo tests was pruritus.
Conclusions: The clinical history alone is not sufficient, all patients with suspected penicillin allergy should be evaluated by in vivo exposure tests with major and minor determinants to corroborate or rule out allergy to this pharmacological class.