矩形可见性图的面积、周长、高度和宽度

IF 0.9 4区 数学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI:10.1007/s10878-023-01084-9
John S. Caughman, Charles L. Dunn, Joshua D. Laison, Nancy Ann Neudauer, Colin L. Starr
{"title":"矩形可见性图的面积、周长、高度和宽度","authors":"John S. Caughman, Charles L. Dunn, Joshua D. Laison, Nancy Ann Neudauer, Colin L. Starr","doi":"10.1007/s10878-023-01084-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A rectangle visibility graph (RVG) is represented by assigning to each vertex a rectangle in the plane with horizontal and vertical sides in such a way that edges in the graph correspond to unobstructed horizontal and vertical lines of sight between their corresponding rectangles. To discretize, we consider only rectangles whose corners have integer coordinates. For any given RVG, we seek a representation with smallest bounding box as measured by its area, perimeter, height, or width (height is assumed not to exceed width). We derive a number of results regarding these parameters. Using these results, we show that these four measures are distinct, in the sense that there exist graphs <span>\\(G_1\\)</span> and <span>\\(G_2\\)</span> with <span>\\({{\\,\\textrm{area}\\,}}(G_1) &lt; {{\\,\\textrm{area}\\,}}(G_2)\\)</span> but <span>\\({{\\,\\textrm{perim}\\,}}(G_2) &lt; {{\\,\\textrm{perim}\\,}}(G_1)\\)</span>, and analogously for all other pairs of these parameters. We further show that there exists a graph <span>\\(G_3\\)</span> with representations <span>\\(S_1\\)</span> and <span>\\(S_2\\)</span> such that <span>\\({{\\,\\textrm{area}\\,}}(G_3)={{\\,\\textrm{area}\\,}}(S_1)&lt;{{\\,\\textrm{area}\\,}}(S_2)\\)</span> but <span>\\({{\\,\\textrm{perim}\\,}}(G_3)={{\\,\\textrm{perim}\\,}}(S_2)&lt;{{\\,\\textrm{perim}\\,}}(S_1)\\)</span>. In other words, <span>\\(G_3\\)</span> requires distinct representations to minimize area and perimeter. Similarly, such graphs exist to demonstrate the independence of all other pairs of these parameters. Among graphs with <span>\\(n \\le 6\\)</span> vertices, the empty graph <span>\\(E_n\\)</span> requires largest area. But for graphs with <span>\\(n=7\\)</span> and <span>\\(n=8\\)</span> vertices, we show that the complete graphs <span>\\(K_7\\)</span> and <span>\\(K_8\\)</span> require larger area than <span>\\(E_7\\)</span> and <span>\\(E_8\\)</span>, respectively. Using this, we show that for all <span>\\(n \\ge 8\\)</span>, the empty graph <span>\\(E_n\\)</span> does not have largest area, perimeter, height, or width among all RVGs on <i>n</i> vertices.</p>","PeriodicalId":50231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Combinatorial Optimization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Area, perimeter, height, and width of rectangle visibility graphs\",\"authors\":\"John S. Caughman, Charles L. Dunn, Joshua D. Laison, Nancy Ann Neudauer, Colin L. Starr\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10878-023-01084-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A rectangle visibility graph (RVG) is represented by assigning to each vertex a rectangle in the plane with horizontal and vertical sides in such a way that edges in the graph correspond to unobstructed horizontal and vertical lines of sight between their corresponding rectangles. To discretize, we consider only rectangles whose corners have integer coordinates. For any given RVG, we seek a representation with smallest bounding box as measured by its area, perimeter, height, or width (height is assumed not to exceed width). We derive a number of results regarding these parameters. Using these results, we show that these four measures are distinct, in the sense that there exist graphs <span>\\\\(G_1\\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\(G_2\\\\)</span> with <span>\\\\({{\\\\,\\\\textrm{area}\\\\,}}(G_1) &lt; {{\\\\,\\\\textrm{area}\\\\,}}(G_2)\\\\)</span> but <span>\\\\({{\\\\,\\\\textrm{perim}\\\\,}}(G_2) &lt; {{\\\\,\\\\textrm{perim}\\\\,}}(G_1)\\\\)</span>, and analogously for all other pairs of these parameters. We further show that there exists a graph <span>\\\\(G_3\\\\)</span> with representations <span>\\\\(S_1\\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\(S_2\\\\)</span> such that <span>\\\\({{\\\\,\\\\textrm{area}\\\\,}}(G_3)={{\\\\,\\\\textrm{area}\\\\,}}(S_1)&lt;{{\\\\,\\\\textrm{area}\\\\,}}(S_2)\\\\)</span> but <span>\\\\({{\\\\,\\\\textrm{perim}\\\\,}}(G_3)={{\\\\,\\\\textrm{perim}\\\\,}}(S_2)&lt;{{\\\\,\\\\textrm{perim}\\\\,}}(S_1)\\\\)</span>. In other words, <span>\\\\(G_3\\\\)</span> requires distinct representations to minimize area and perimeter. Similarly, such graphs exist to demonstrate the independence of all other pairs of these parameters. Among graphs with <span>\\\\(n \\\\le 6\\\\)</span> vertices, the empty graph <span>\\\\(E_n\\\\)</span> requires largest area. But for graphs with <span>\\\\(n=7\\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\(n=8\\\\)</span> vertices, we show that the complete graphs <span>\\\\(K_7\\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\(K_8\\\\)</span> require larger area than <span>\\\\(E_7\\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\(E_8\\\\)</span>, respectively. Using this, we show that for all <span>\\\\(n \\\\ge 8\\\\)</span>, the empty graph <span>\\\\(E_n\\\\)</span> does not have largest area, perimeter, height, or width among all RVGs on <i>n</i> vertices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Combinatorial Optimization\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Combinatorial Optimization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-023-01084-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Combinatorial Optimization","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-023-01084-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

矩形可见性图(RVG)是通过将平面中具有水平和垂直边的矩形分配给每个顶点来表示的,使得图中的边对应于其对应矩形之间的无障碍水平和垂直视线。为了离散化,我们只考虑角点具有整数坐标的矩形。对于任何给定的RVG,我们寻求一个具有最小边界框的表示,该边界框通过其面积、周长、高度或宽度(假设高度不超过宽度)来测量。我们得到了许多关于这些参数的结果。利用这些结果,我们证明了这四个测度是不同的,在这个意义上存在图\(G_1\)和\(G_2\),其中\({{\,\textrm{area}\,}})(G_1)<;{{\,\textrm{area}\,}}(G_2)\),但\({\、\textrm{perim}\、})<;{{\,\textrm{perim}\,}}(G_1)\),并且类似地用于这些参数的所有其他对。我们进一步证明了存在一个具有表示\(S_1\)和\(S_2\)的图\(G_3\),使得\;{{\,\textrm{area}\,}}(S_2)\),但\({\、\textrm{perim}\、})(G_3)={\;{{\,\textrm{perim}\,}}(S_1)\)。换句话说,\(G_3\)需要不同的表示来最小化面积和周长。类似地,存在这样的图来证明这些参数的所有其他对的独立性。在具有\(n\le 6\)个顶点的图中,空图\(E_n\)需要最大的面积。但对于具有\(n=7)和\(n=8)顶点的图,我们证明了完备图\(K_7)和(K_8)分别需要比\(E_7)和/(E_8)更大的面积。利用这一点,我们证明了对于所有的图,在n个顶点上的所有RVG中,空图没有最大的面积、周长、高度或宽度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Area, perimeter, height, and width of rectangle visibility graphs

A rectangle visibility graph (RVG) is represented by assigning to each vertex a rectangle in the plane with horizontal and vertical sides in such a way that edges in the graph correspond to unobstructed horizontal and vertical lines of sight between their corresponding rectangles. To discretize, we consider only rectangles whose corners have integer coordinates. For any given RVG, we seek a representation with smallest bounding box as measured by its area, perimeter, height, or width (height is assumed not to exceed width). We derive a number of results regarding these parameters. Using these results, we show that these four measures are distinct, in the sense that there exist graphs \(G_1\) and \(G_2\) with \({{\,\textrm{area}\,}}(G_1) < {{\,\textrm{area}\,}}(G_2)\) but \({{\,\textrm{perim}\,}}(G_2) < {{\,\textrm{perim}\,}}(G_1)\), and analogously for all other pairs of these parameters. We further show that there exists a graph \(G_3\) with representations \(S_1\) and \(S_2\) such that \({{\,\textrm{area}\,}}(G_3)={{\,\textrm{area}\,}}(S_1)<{{\,\textrm{area}\,}}(S_2)\) but \({{\,\textrm{perim}\,}}(G_3)={{\,\textrm{perim}\,}}(S_2)<{{\,\textrm{perim}\,}}(S_1)\). In other words, \(G_3\) requires distinct representations to minimize area and perimeter. Similarly, such graphs exist to demonstrate the independence of all other pairs of these parameters. Among graphs with \(n \le 6\) vertices, the empty graph \(E_n\) requires largest area. But for graphs with \(n=7\) and \(n=8\) vertices, we show that the complete graphs \(K_7\) and \(K_8\) require larger area than \(E_7\) and \(E_8\), respectively. Using this, we show that for all \(n \ge 8\), the empty graph \(E_n\) does not have largest area, perimeter, height, or width among all RVGs on n vertices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization 数学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The objective of Journal of Combinatorial Optimization is to advance and promote the theory and applications of combinatorial optimization, which is an area of research at the intersection of applied mathematics, computer science, and operations research and which overlaps with many other areas such as computation complexity, computational biology, VLSI design, communication networks, and management science. It includes complexity analysis and algorithm design for combinatorial optimization problems, numerical experiments and problem discovery with applications in science and engineering. The Journal of Combinatorial Optimization publishes refereed papers dealing with all theoretical, computational and applied aspects of combinatorial optimization. It also publishes reviews of appropriate books and special issues of journals.
期刊最新文献
Efficient branch-and-bound algorithms for finding triangle-constrained 2-clubs Minmax regret 1-sink location problems on dynamic flow path networks with parametric weights Efficient estimation of the modified Gromov–Hausdorff distance between unweighted graphs Meta-heuristic-based hybrid deep learning model for vulnerability detection and prevention in software system The prize-collecting single machine scheduling with bounds and penalties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1