使用一种新型测量设备评估与口面力相关的测量:解释构音障碍患者的言语频率。

Expert review of medical devices Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-24 DOI:10.1080/17434440.2023.2282178
Omid Mohamadi, Farhad Torabinezhad, Mohammad Ali Sanjari, Nazanin Razazian, Abbas Ebadi
{"title":"使用一种新型测量设备评估与口面力相关的测量:解释构音障碍患者的言语频率。","authors":"Omid Mohamadi, Farhad Torabinezhad, Mohammad Ali Sanjari, Nazanin Razazian, Abbas Ebadi","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2023.2282178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to examine the potential associations between orofacial force-related measures and speech rate in matched groups of 23 adults with dysarthria, and 69 healthy adults.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A novel piezoresistive sensor-based device was utilized to obtain the orofacial maximum forces (OMFs) and rate of force development (RFD) measures. The study computed alternating motion rates (AMRs), sequential motion rates (SMRs), and articulation rate (AR) for all participants. The analysis included between-group comparisons and correlation analyses. The study also examined the reliability of the OMFs and RFD measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with dysarthria exhibited significantly slower speech rates (approximately 41.89% to 56.53% slower) compared to the control group. Except for a few exceptions in the jaw, the dysarthria group demonstrated significantly lower OMFs and RFD measures. The correlation analysis revealed that OMFs were weakly to moderately correlated (<i>r</i> = .488-.674) and RFD measures were very weak to moderately correlated (<i>r</i> = .047-.578) with speech rate measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that reduced OMFs and RFD measures may contribute to the slowed speech rate observed in adults with dysarthria. The study also highlights that OMFs are significantly more reliable (day-to-day) than RFD measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of orofacial force-related measures using a novel measuring device: explanation of associations with speech rate in dysarthria.\",\"authors\":\"Omid Mohamadi, Farhad Torabinezhad, Mohammad Ali Sanjari, Nazanin Razazian, Abbas Ebadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17434440.2023.2282178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to examine the potential associations between orofacial force-related measures and speech rate in matched groups of 23 adults with dysarthria, and 69 healthy adults.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A novel piezoresistive sensor-based device was utilized to obtain the orofacial maximum forces (OMFs) and rate of force development (RFD) measures. The study computed alternating motion rates (AMRs), sequential motion rates (SMRs), and articulation rate (AR) for all participants. The analysis included between-group comparisons and correlation analyses. The study also examined the reliability of the OMFs and RFD measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with dysarthria exhibited significantly slower speech rates (approximately 41.89% to 56.53% slower) compared to the control group. Except for a few exceptions in the jaw, the dysarthria group demonstrated significantly lower OMFs and RFD measures. The correlation analysis revealed that OMFs were weakly to moderately correlated (<i>r</i> = .488-.674) and RFD measures were very weak to moderately correlated (<i>r</i> = .047-.578) with speech rate measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that reduced OMFs and RFD measures may contribute to the slowed speech rate observed in adults with dysarthria. The study also highlights that OMFs are significantly more reliable (day-to-day) than RFD measures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert review of medical devices\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert review of medical devices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2023.2282178\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of medical devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2023.2282178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是在23名患有构音障碍的成年人和69名健康成年人的匹配组中,检查口面力相关测量与言语频率之间的潜在关联。研究设计和方法:利用一种新型的基于压阻传感器的装置来获得口腔面最大力(OMF)和力发展率(RFD)测量值。该研究计算了所有参与者的交替运动率(AMRs)、连续运动率(SMRs)和关节运动率(AR)。分析包括组间比较和相关性分析。该研究还检验了OMF和RFD测量的可靠性。结果:与对照组相比,患有构音障碍的个体表现出明显较慢的说话速度(约慢41.89%至56.53%)。除了颌骨的少数例外,构音障碍组表现出明显较低的OMF和RFD测量值。相关分析表明,OMF呈弱至中度相关(r = .488-.674)和RFD测量之间的相关性非常弱到中等(r = .047-.578)的语音速率测量。结论:研究结果表明,OMF和RFD测量的减少可能有助于在成人构音障碍患者中观察到的语速减慢。该研究还强调,OMF(日常)比RFD测量更可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of orofacial force-related measures using a novel measuring device: explanation of associations with speech rate in dysarthria.

Background: The aim of this study was to examine the potential associations between orofacial force-related measures and speech rate in matched groups of 23 adults with dysarthria, and 69 healthy adults.

Research design and methods: A novel piezoresistive sensor-based device was utilized to obtain the orofacial maximum forces (OMFs) and rate of force development (RFD) measures. The study computed alternating motion rates (AMRs), sequential motion rates (SMRs), and articulation rate (AR) for all participants. The analysis included between-group comparisons and correlation analyses. The study also examined the reliability of the OMFs and RFD measures.

Results: Individuals with dysarthria exhibited significantly slower speech rates (approximately 41.89% to 56.53% slower) compared to the control group. Except for a few exceptions in the jaw, the dysarthria group demonstrated significantly lower OMFs and RFD measures. The correlation analysis revealed that OMFs were weakly to moderately correlated (r = .488-.674) and RFD measures were very weak to moderately correlated (r = .047-.578) with speech rate measures.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that reduced OMFs and RFD measures may contribute to the slowed speech rate observed in adults with dysarthria. The study also highlights that OMFs are significantly more reliable (day-to-day) than RFD measures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Orphan and paediatric medical devices in Europe: recommendations to support their availability for on-label and off-label clinical indications. Medical device similarity analysis: a promising approach to medical device equivalence regulation. Delivery systems for transcatheter therapies of congenital heart disease. Evaluation and management of coronary artery disease in transcatheter aortic valve implantation candidates with severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease: technology and techniques. Transforming medical education: the impact of innovations in technology and medical devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1