Ela-Joy Lehrman CNM, PhD , Lisa L. Paine CNM, DrPH
{"title":"助产护士的发展趋势","authors":"Ela-Joy Lehrman CNM, PhD , Lisa L. Paine CNM, DrPH","doi":"10.1016/0091-2182(90)90111-H","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of the 1988 Mini-Survey was the collection of up-to-date data from the ACNM membership, focusing on nurse-midwifery income. These were the last data collected about CNMs for the 1930 decade. The final survey sample included 1,735 CNMs and 67 SNMs; 70.6% of the CNMs were in clinical practice. The demographic, employment, and income findings are presented for all CNM respondents by ACNM region of residence and for CNMs in full-scope clinical nurse-midwifery practice. Additional income findings for CNMs working full time and part time are also presented by ACNM region of residence, as well as by selected individual states. Nurse-midwifery income is compared with nursing income during the same time period. Demographic and/or employment characteristics are presented for CNMs doing home births, for student nurse-midwives, for nurse-midwifery faculty, and for nurse-midwives with doctorates. In surveys done from 1984 to 1988, the mean full-time CNM annual income increased by $10,000. The 1988 Survey data are now approximately two years old and the impact of the recent nursing shortage on both nursing and nurse-midwifery salaries was not necessarily reflected in these data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nurse-midwifery","volume":"35 4","pages":"Pages 192-203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0091-2182(90)90111-H","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in nurse-midwifery\",\"authors\":\"Ela-Joy Lehrman CNM, PhD , Lisa L. Paine CNM, DrPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0091-2182(90)90111-H\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The purpose of the 1988 Mini-Survey was the collection of up-to-date data from the ACNM membership, focusing on nurse-midwifery income. These were the last data collected about CNMs for the 1930 decade. The final survey sample included 1,735 CNMs and 67 SNMs; 70.6% of the CNMs were in clinical practice. The demographic, employment, and income findings are presented for all CNM respondents by ACNM region of residence and for CNMs in full-scope clinical nurse-midwifery practice. Additional income findings for CNMs working full time and part time are also presented by ACNM region of residence, as well as by selected individual states. Nurse-midwifery income is compared with nursing income during the same time period. Demographic and/or employment characteristics are presented for CNMs doing home births, for student nurse-midwives, for nurse-midwifery faculty, and for nurse-midwives with doctorates. In surveys done from 1984 to 1988, the mean full-time CNM annual income increased by $10,000. The 1988 Survey data are now approximately two years old and the impact of the recent nursing shortage on both nursing and nurse-midwifery salaries was not necessarily reflected in these data.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nurse-midwifery\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 192-203\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0091-2182(90)90111-H\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nurse-midwifery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/009121829090111H\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nurse-midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/009121829090111H","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The purpose of the 1988 Mini-Survey was the collection of up-to-date data from the ACNM membership, focusing on nurse-midwifery income. These were the last data collected about CNMs for the 1930 decade. The final survey sample included 1,735 CNMs and 67 SNMs; 70.6% of the CNMs were in clinical practice. The demographic, employment, and income findings are presented for all CNM respondents by ACNM region of residence and for CNMs in full-scope clinical nurse-midwifery practice. Additional income findings for CNMs working full time and part time are also presented by ACNM region of residence, as well as by selected individual states. Nurse-midwifery income is compared with nursing income during the same time period. Demographic and/or employment characteristics are presented for CNMs doing home births, for student nurse-midwives, for nurse-midwifery faculty, and for nurse-midwives with doctorates. In surveys done from 1984 to 1988, the mean full-time CNM annual income increased by $10,000. The 1988 Survey data are now approximately two years old and the impact of the recent nursing shortage on both nursing and nurse-midwifery salaries was not necessarily reflected in these data.