联合使用Fototest和Mini-Cog治疗认知障碍的诊断效用和预测效度

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurologia Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.nrl.2021.01.017
C. Carnero-Pardo , S. López-Alcalde , M. Florido-Santiago , M. Espinosa-García , I. Rego-García , R. Calle-Calle , I. Carrera-Muñoz , R. de la Vega-Cotarelo
{"title":"联合使用Fototest和Mini-Cog治疗认知障碍的诊断效用和预测效度","authors":"C. Carnero-Pardo ,&nbsp;S. López-Alcalde ,&nbsp;M. Florido-Santiago ,&nbsp;M. Espinosa-García ,&nbsp;I. Rego-García ,&nbsp;R. Calle-Calle ,&nbsp;I. Carrera-Muñoz ,&nbsp;R. de la Vega-Cotarelo","doi":"10.1016/j.nrl.2021.01.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The Fototest and Mini-Cog include all the domains that are necessary in a cognitive assessment. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the combined use of both instruments for detecting cognitive impairment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a phase <span>iii</span> diagnostic accuracy study with 2 independent samples: STUDY, which included 448 participants randomly allocated to 2 datasets (BASE [80%] and TEST [20%]); and EXTERNAL, which included 61 participants. The index test was consecutive administration of the Fototest and Mini-Cog, and the reference test was formal cognitive assessment. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of two-step vs. consecutive application of the tests and simple (Comb-Simple), logistic regression (Comb-LR), and random decision tree (Comb-RDT) models of their combined use for detecting cognitive impairment (Global Deterioration Scale score ≥ 3). We performed an exploratory analysis of the BASE dataset, selecting criteria that maximise accuracy; a pre-specified analysis was used to evaluate the selected criteria in the TEST and EXTERNAL datasets.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The diagnostic accuracy (95% confidence interval) of the combined models in the BASE dataset (Comb-Simple: 88.3 [88.5-91.4]; Comb-LR: 91.6 [88.2-94.3]; Comb-RDT 95.2 [92.5-97.2]) was significantly higher than the individual values observed for the Mini-Cog and Fototest (81.6 [77.1-85.4] and 84.9 [80.8-88.5], respectively). These results were replicated in the TEST (Comb-Simple: 88.9; Comb-LR: 95.6; Comb-RDT: 92.2) and EXTERNAL datasets (Comb-Simple: 91.8; Comb-LR: 90.2; Comb-RDT: 88.5). Two-step application had the same diagnostic accuracy than consecutive application but required less time (mean [SD] of 197.3 s [56.7] vs. 233.9 s [45.2]; <em>P</em>&lt;.0001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Combined application of the Fototest and Mini-Cog takes less than 4<!--> <!-->minutes and improves the diagnostic accuracy of both instruments. Two-step application is more efficient as it requires less time while maintaining the same diagnostic accuracy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19300,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia","volume":"38 9","pages":"Pages 653-662"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.nrl.2021.01.017","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilidad diagnóstica y validez predictiva del uso conjunto de Fototest y Mini-Cog en deterioro cognitivo\",\"authors\":\"C. Carnero-Pardo ,&nbsp;S. López-Alcalde ,&nbsp;M. Florido-Santiago ,&nbsp;M. Espinosa-García ,&nbsp;I. Rego-García ,&nbsp;R. Calle-Calle ,&nbsp;I. Carrera-Muñoz ,&nbsp;R. de la Vega-Cotarelo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nrl.2021.01.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The Fototest and Mini-Cog include all the domains that are necessary in a cognitive assessment. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the combined use of both instruments for detecting cognitive impairment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a phase <span>iii</span> diagnostic accuracy study with 2 independent samples: STUDY, which included 448 participants randomly allocated to 2 datasets (BASE [80%] and TEST [20%]); and EXTERNAL, which included 61 participants. The index test was consecutive administration of the Fototest and Mini-Cog, and the reference test was formal cognitive assessment. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of two-step vs. consecutive application of the tests and simple (Comb-Simple), logistic regression (Comb-LR), and random decision tree (Comb-RDT) models of their combined use for detecting cognitive impairment (Global Deterioration Scale score ≥ 3). We performed an exploratory analysis of the BASE dataset, selecting criteria that maximise accuracy; a pre-specified analysis was used to evaluate the selected criteria in the TEST and EXTERNAL datasets.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The diagnostic accuracy (95% confidence interval) of the combined models in the BASE dataset (Comb-Simple: 88.3 [88.5-91.4]; Comb-LR: 91.6 [88.2-94.3]; Comb-RDT 95.2 [92.5-97.2]) was significantly higher than the individual values observed for the Mini-Cog and Fototest (81.6 [77.1-85.4] and 84.9 [80.8-88.5], respectively). These results were replicated in the TEST (Comb-Simple: 88.9; Comb-LR: 95.6; Comb-RDT: 92.2) and EXTERNAL datasets (Comb-Simple: 91.8; Comb-LR: 90.2; Comb-RDT: 88.5). Two-step application had the same diagnostic accuracy than consecutive application but required less time (mean [SD] of 197.3 s [56.7] vs. 233.9 s [45.2]; <em>P</em>&lt;.0001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Combined application of the Fototest and Mini-Cog takes less than 4<!--> <!-->minutes and improves the diagnostic accuracy of both instruments. Two-step application is more efficient as it requires less time while maintaining the same diagnostic accuracy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurologia\",\"volume\":\"38 9\",\"pages\":\"Pages 653-662\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.nrl.2021.01.017\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213485321000529\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213485321000529","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

引言Fototest和Mini-Cog包括认知评估所需的所有领域。本研究旨在评估联合使用这两种仪器检测认知障碍的诊断准确性。方法我们用2个独立样本进行了iii期诊断准确性研究:研究,包括448名参与者,随机分配到2个数据集(BASE[80%]和TEST[20%]);和EXTERNAL,包括61名参与者。指标测试是连续服用Fototest和Mini-Cog,参考测试是正式的认知评估。我们评估了两步与连续应用测试的诊断准确性,以及简单(Comb simple)、逻辑回归(Comb-LR)和随机决策树(Comb-RDT)模型的组合用于检测认知障碍(全局恶化量表得分≥3)。我们对BASE数据集进行了探索性分析,选择了最大限度提高准确性的标准;使用预先指定的分析来评估TEST和EXTERNAL数据集中的选定标准。结果BASE数据集中的组合模型(Comb Simple:88.3[88.5-91.4];Comb LR:91.6[88.2-94.3];Comb-RDT 95.2[92.5-97.2])的诊断准确率(95%置信区间)显著高于Mini-Cog和Fototest的个体值(分别为81.6[77.1-85.4]和84.9[80.8-88.5])。这些结果在TEST(Comb Simple:88.9;Comb LR:95.6;Comb RDT:92.2)和EXTERNAL数据集(Comb Simple:91.8;Comb LR:90.2;Comb RD T:88.5)中得到了复制。两步应用与连续应用具有相同的诊断准确性,但所需时间较少(平均[SD]为197.3 s[56.7],233.9 s[45.2];P<;.0001)。结论Fototest和Mini-Cog的联合应用耗时不到4分钟,提高了两种仪器的诊断准确性。两步应用程序效率更高,因为它需要更少的时间,同时保持相同的诊断准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Utilidad diagnóstica y validez predictiva del uso conjunto de Fototest y Mini-Cog en deterioro cognitivo

Introduction

The Fototest and Mini-Cog include all the domains that are necessary in a cognitive assessment. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the combined use of both instruments for detecting cognitive impairment.

Methods

We performed a phase iii diagnostic accuracy study with 2 independent samples: STUDY, which included 448 participants randomly allocated to 2 datasets (BASE [80%] and TEST [20%]); and EXTERNAL, which included 61 participants. The index test was consecutive administration of the Fototest and Mini-Cog, and the reference test was formal cognitive assessment. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of two-step vs. consecutive application of the tests and simple (Comb-Simple), logistic regression (Comb-LR), and random decision tree (Comb-RDT) models of their combined use for detecting cognitive impairment (Global Deterioration Scale score ≥ 3). We performed an exploratory analysis of the BASE dataset, selecting criteria that maximise accuracy; a pre-specified analysis was used to evaluate the selected criteria in the TEST and EXTERNAL datasets.

Results

The diagnostic accuracy (95% confidence interval) of the combined models in the BASE dataset (Comb-Simple: 88.3 [88.5-91.4]; Comb-LR: 91.6 [88.2-94.3]; Comb-RDT 95.2 [92.5-97.2]) was significantly higher than the individual values observed for the Mini-Cog and Fototest (81.6 [77.1-85.4] and 84.9 [80.8-88.5], respectively). These results were replicated in the TEST (Comb-Simple: 88.9; Comb-LR: 95.6; Comb-RDT: 92.2) and EXTERNAL datasets (Comb-Simple: 91.8; Comb-LR: 90.2; Comb-RDT: 88.5). Two-step application had the same diagnostic accuracy than consecutive application but required less time (mean [SD] of 197.3 s [56.7] vs. 233.9 s [45.2]; P<.0001).

Conclusions

Combined application of the Fototest and Mini-Cog takes less than 4 minutes and improves the diagnostic accuracy of both instruments. Two-step application is more efficient as it requires less time while maintaining the same diagnostic accuracy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurologia
Neurologia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
135
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Neurología es la revista oficial de la Sociedad Española de Neurología y publica, desde 1986 contribuciones científicas en el campo de la neurología clínica y experimental. Los contenidos de Neurología abarcan desde la neuroepidemiología, la clínica neurológica, la gestión y asistencia neurológica y la terapéutica, a la investigación básica en neurociencias aplicada a la neurología. Las áreas temáticas de la revistas incluyen la neurologia infantil, la neuropsicología, la neurorehabilitación y la neurogeriatría. Los artículos publicados en Neurología siguen un proceso de revisión por doble ciego a fin de que los trabajos sean seleccionados atendiendo a su calidad, originalidad e interés y así estén sometidos a un proceso de mejora. El formato de artículos incluye Editoriales, Originales, Revisiones y Cartas al Editor, Neurología es el vehículo de información científica de reconocida calidad en profesionales interesados en la neurología que utilizan el español, como demuestra su inclusión en los más prestigiosos y selectivos índices bibliográficos del mundo.
期刊最新文献
Síndrome de trombosis con trombocitopenia asociado a vacunas de adenovirus frente a la COVID-19: Epidemiología y presentación clínica de la serie española Validación de Neuromyotype: un teclado inteligente para la evaluación de pacientes con atrofia muscular espinal 5q Test cognitivos breves como herramienta de decisión en Atención Primaria. Estudio poblacional y de validación Estudio CORCOBIA: determinación de puntos de corte de biomarcadores de enfermedad de Alzheimer en LCR en una cohorte clínica Insomnio fatal esporádico: fenotipo PSP-like rápidamente progresivo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1