在第一次癫痫发作进行脑电图前开始抗癫痫药物的意义

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurologia Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.nrl.2021.02.014
A. Llauradó , M. Quintana , E. Fonseca , L. Abraira , M. Toledo , M. Requena , M. Olivé , A. Ballvé , D. Campos , M. Sueiras , E. Santamarina
{"title":"在第一次癫痫发作进行脑电图前开始抗癫痫药物的意义","authors":"A. Llauradó ,&nbsp;M. Quintana ,&nbsp;E. Fonseca ,&nbsp;L. Abraira ,&nbsp;M. Toledo ,&nbsp;M. Requena ,&nbsp;M. Olivé ,&nbsp;A. Ballvé ,&nbsp;D. Campos ,&nbsp;M. Sueiras ,&nbsp;E. Santamarina","doi":"10.1016/j.nrl.2021.02.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>This study aimed to determine whether the administration of antiepileptic drugs (AED) alters the likelihood of detecting epileptiform abnormalities in electroencephalographies (EEG) performed early after a first epileptic seizure.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We performed a retrospective, observational study including patients with a first seizure attended at our centre's emergency department between July 2014 and November 2019. We collected clinical data, as well as technical data on the acquisition and interpretation of the EEG performed within the first 72<!--> <!-->hours after the seizure, and the factors related with seizure recurrence.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We recruited 155 patients with a mean (SD) age of 48.6 (22.5) years; 61.3% were men. Regarding seizure type, 51% presented tonic-clonic seizures of unknown onset and 12% presented focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures. Thirty-nine patients (25.2%) received AED treatment before the EEG was performed: 33 received a non-benzodiazepine AED and 6 received a benzodiazepine. Epileptiform abnormalities were observed in 29.7% of patients. Previous administration of AEDs was not significantly associated with the probability of detecting interictal epileptiform abnormalities <em>(P</em>=.25) or with the risk of recurrence within 6 months <em>(P</em>=.63).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Administration of AEDs before an early EEG following a first seizure does not decrease the likelihood of detecting epileptiform abnormalities. These findings suggest that starting AED treatment immediately in patients with a high risk of early recurrence does not imply a reduction in the diagnostic accuracy of the test.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19300,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia","volume":"38 9","pages":"Pages 647-652"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.nrl.2021.02.014","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implicaciones de iniciar fármacos antiepilépticos previo a la realización de EEG en primeras crisis epilépticas\",\"authors\":\"A. Llauradó ,&nbsp;M. Quintana ,&nbsp;E. Fonseca ,&nbsp;L. Abraira ,&nbsp;M. Toledo ,&nbsp;M. Requena ,&nbsp;M. Olivé ,&nbsp;A. Ballvé ,&nbsp;D. Campos ,&nbsp;M. Sueiras ,&nbsp;E. Santamarina\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nrl.2021.02.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>This study aimed to determine whether the administration of antiepileptic drugs (AED) alters the likelihood of detecting epileptiform abnormalities in electroencephalographies (EEG) performed early after a first epileptic seizure.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We performed a retrospective, observational study including patients with a first seizure attended at our centre's emergency department between July 2014 and November 2019. We collected clinical data, as well as technical data on the acquisition and interpretation of the EEG performed within the first 72<!--> <!-->hours after the seizure, and the factors related with seizure recurrence.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We recruited 155 patients with a mean (SD) age of 48.6 (22.5) years; 61.3% were men. Regarding seizure type, 51% presented tonic-clonic seizures of unknown onset and 12% presented focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures. Thirty-nine patients (25.2%) received AED treatment before the EEG was performed: 33 received a non-benzodiazepine AED and 6 received a benzodiazepine. Epileptiform abnormalities were observed in 29.7% of patients. Previous administration of AEDs was not significantly associated with the probability of detecting interictal epileptiform abnormalities <em>(P</em>=.25) or with the risk of recurrence within 6 months <em>(P</em>=.63).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Administration of AEDs before an early EEG following a first seizure does not decrease the likelihood of detecting epileptiform abnormalities. These findings suggest that starting AED treatment immediately in patients with a high risk of early recurrence does not imply a reduction in the diagnostic accuracy of the test.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurologia\",\"volume\":\"38 9\",\"pages\":\"Pages 647-652\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.nrl.2021.02.014\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213485321000530\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213485321000530","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言本研究旨在确定抗癫痫药物(AED)的给药是否会改变首次癫痫发作后早期脑电图(EEG)中检测到癫痫样异常的可能性。方法我们进行了一项回顾性观察性研究,包括2014年7月至2019年11月在我们中心急诊科就诊的首次癫痫患者。我们收集了临床数据,以及关于癫痫发作后前72小时内脑电图采集和解释的技术数据,以及与癫痫复发相关的因素。结果我们招募了155名患者,平均(SD)年龄为48.6(22.5)岁;男性占61.3%。就癫痫发作类型而言,51%的患者出现不明发作的强直-阵挛性癫痫发作,12%的患者出现局灶性至双侧强直-阵痛性癫痫发作。39名患者(25.2%)在脑电图检查前接受了AED治疗:33名接受了非苯二氮卓类AED治疗,6名接受了苯二氮卓类药物治疗。29.7%的患者出现癫痫样异常。既往使用AED与发现发作间期癫痫样异常的概率(P=.25)或6个月内复发的风险(P=.63)无显著相关性。这些发现表明,对早期复发风险较高的患者立即开始AED治疗并不意味着测试的诊断准确性降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implicaciones de iniciar fármacos antiepilépticos previo a la realización de EEG en primeras crisis epilépticas

Introduction

This study aimed to determine whether the administration of antiepileptic drugs (AED) alters the likelihood of detecting epileptiform abnormalities in electroencephalographies (EEG) performed early after a first epileptic seizure.

Method

We performed a retrospective, observational study including patients with a first seizure attended at our centre's emergency department between July 2014 and November 2019. We collected clinical data, as well as technical data on the acquisition and interpretation of the EEG performed within the first 72 hours after the seizure, and the factors related with seizure recurrence.

Results

We recruited 155 patients with a mean (SD) age of 48.6 (22.5) years; 61.3% were men. Regarding seizure type, 51% presented tonic-clonic seizures of unknown onset and 12% presented focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures. Thirty-nine patients (25.2%) received AED treatment before the EEG was performed: 33 received a non-benzodiazepine AED and 6 received a benzodiazepine. Epileptiform abnormalities were observed in 29.7% of patients. Previous administration of AEDs was not significantly associated with the probability of detecting interictal epileptiform abnormalities (P=.25) or with the risk of recurrence within 6 months (P=.63).

Conclusions

Administration of AEDs before an early EEG following a first seizure does not decrease the likelihood of detecting epileptiform abnormalities. These findings suggest that starting AED treatment immediately in patients with a high risk of early recurrence does not imply a reduction in the diagnostic accuracy of the test.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurologia
Neurologia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
135
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Neurología es la revista oficial de la Sociedad Española de Neurología y publica, desde 1986 contribuciones científicas en el campo de la neurología clínica y experimental. Los contenidos de Neurología abarcan desde la neuroepidemiología, la clínica neurológica, la gestión y asistencia neurológica y la terapéutica, a la investigación básica en neurociencias aplicada a la neurología. Las áreas temáticas de la revistas incluyen la neurologia infantil, la neuropsicología, la neurorehabilitación y la neurogeriatría. Los artículos publicados en Neurología siguen un proceso de revisión por doble ciego a fin de que los trabajos sean seleccionados atendiendo a su calidad, originalidad e interés y así estén sometidos a un proceso de mejora. El formato de artículos incluye Editoriales, Originales, Revisiones y Cartas al Editor, Neurología es el vehículo de información científica de reconocida calidad en profesionales interesados en la neurología que utilizan el español, como demuestra su inclusión en los más prestigiosos y selectivos índices bibliográficos del mundo.
期刊最新文献
Síndrome de trombosis con trombocitopenia asociado a vacunas de adenovirus frente a la COVID-19: Epidemiología y presentación clínica de la serie española Validación de Neuromyotype: un teclado inteligente para la evaluación de pacientes con atrofia muscular espinal 5q Test cognitivos breves como herramienta de decisión en Atención Primaria. Estudio poblacional y de validación Estudio CORCOBIA: determinación de puntos de corte de biomarcadores de enfermedad de Alzheimer en LCR en una cohorte clínica Insomnio fatal esporádico: fenotipo PSP-like rápidamente progresivo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1