谁在急诊部门做什么来确保自我中毒后的记忆恢复?一项对法国大学医院中心的调查

Juliette Salles , Aurélie Giron , Christophe Arbus
{"title":"谁在急诊部门做什么来确保自我中毒后的记忆恢复?一项对法国大学医院中心的调查","authors":"Juliette Salles ,&nbsp;Aurélie Giron ,&nbsp;Christophe Arbus","doi":"10.1016/j.fjpsy.2020.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Suicide prevention is a critical issue, and is related to the care and follow-up provided after a suicide attempt. This treatment is, however, linked to a patient's ability to memorize the information given to them in the emergency department, even though their memory may be impaired due to the drugs ingested after a self-poisoning suicide attempt. There is therefore a recommendation that a patient's cognitive-function should be evaluated in these circumstances. The aim of this study was to examine how this advice is applied in practice.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a telephone survey of the 30 teaching hospitals in France. The psychiatric team at each center was asked about the cognitive tests or other methods they employed to evaluate a patient's cognitive-function. We also examined the other markers used.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Only one of the hospitals contacted used a cognitive test. The others determined cognitive recuperation based on factors such as clinical opinion, vigilance or the plasma half-life of the drugs ingested.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There was no consensus on whether and which cognitive tests should be used following a self-poisoning suicide attempt. Indeed, these tests were very rarely employed. Most of the hospitals contacted used clinical markers, even though these have major limitations. The issue of conducting cognitive evaluations after deliberate self-poisoning must therefore be addressed in order to harmonize clinical practice throughout the country.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12420,"journal":{"name":"French Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"2 ","pages":"Pages 59-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who is doing what in emergency departments to ensure memory recovery after self-poisoning? A survey of university hospital centers in France\",\"authors\":\"Juliette Salles ,&nbsp;Aurélie Giron ,&nbsp;Christophe Arbus\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fjpsy.2020.04.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Suicide prevention is a critical issue, and is related to the care and follow-up provided after a suicide attempt. This treatment is, however, linked to a patient's ability to memorize the information given to them in the emergency department, even though their memory may be impaired due to the drugs ingested after a self-poisoning suicide attempt. There is therefore a recommendation that a patient's cognitive-function should be evaluated in these circumstances. The aim of this study was to examine how this advice is applied in practice.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a telephone survey of the 30 teaching hospitals in France. The psychiatric team at each center was asked about the cognitive tests or other methods they employed to evaluate a patient's cognitive-function. We also examined the other markers used.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Only one of the hospitals contacted used a cognitive test. The others determined cognitive recuperation based on factors such as clinical opinion, vigilance or the plasma half-life of the drugs ingested.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There was no consensus on whether and which cognitive tests should be used following a self-poisoning suicide attempt. Indeed, these tests were very rarely employed. Most of the hospitals contacted used clinical markers, even though these have major limitations. The issue of conducting cognitive evaluations after deliberate self-poisoning must therefore be addressed in order to harmonize clinical practice throughout the country.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"French Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 59-64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"French Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590241520300167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"French Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590241520300167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自杀预防是一个关键问题,与自杀未遂后的护理和随访有关。然而,这种治疗与患者记忆急诊科提供给他们的信息的能力有关,尽管他们的记忆可能会因自杀未遂后摄入的药物而受损。因此,建议在这种情况下评估患者的认知功能。这项研究的目的是检验这一建议在实践中是如何应用的。方法对法国30所教学医院进行电话调查。每个中心的精神科团队都被问及他们用来评估患者认知功能的认知测试或其他方法。我们还检查了使用的其他标记。结果在接触的医院中,只有一家使用了认知测试。其他人根据临床意见、警惕性或摄入药物的血浆半衰期等因素确定认知恢复。结论对于自杀未遂后是否应该使用认知测试以及应该使用哪些认知测试,目前还没有达成共识。事实上,这些测试很少被采用。接触的大多数医院都使用了临床标志物,尽管这些标志物有很大的局限性。因此,必须解决故意自我中毒后进行认知评估的问题,以协调全国的临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Who is doing what in emergency departments to ensure memory recovery after self-poisoning? A survey of university hospital centers in France

Introduction

Suicide prevention is a critical issue, and is related to the care and follow-up provided after a suicide attempt. This treatment is, however, linked to a patient's ability to memorize the information given to them in the emergency department, even though their memory may be impaired due to the drugs ingested after a self-poisoning suicide attempt. There is therefore a recommendation that a patient's cognitive-function should be evaluated in these circumstances. The aim of this study was to examine how this advice is applied in practice.

Methods

We performed a telephone survey of the 30 teaching hospitals in France. The psychiatric team at each center was asked about the cognitive tests or other methods they employed to evaluate a patient's cognitive-function. We also examined the other markers used.

Results

Only one of the hospitals contacted used a cognitive test. The others determined cognitive recuperation based on factors such as clinical opinion, vigilance or the plasma half-life of the drugs ingested.

Conclusion

There was no consensus on whether and which cognitive tests should be used following a self-poisoning suicide attempt. Indeed, these tests were very rarely employed. Most of the hospitals contacted used clinical markers, even though these have major limitations. The issue of conducting cognitive evaluations after deliberate self-poisoning must therefore be addressed in order to harmonize clinical practice throughout the country.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Intensive supportive ambulatory aftercare may increase adherence to treatment and decrease depressive symptoms in patients after a suicide attempt Evidence for the association of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor CHRNA5/A3/B4 gene cluster and nicotine dependence in a young population of students Euthanasia: Should psychiatric patients be systematically excluded? Who is doing what in emergency departments to ensure memory recovery after self-poisoning? A survey of university hospital centers in France
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1