滩涂和多通道河口易受疏浚和处置的影响

IF 1.6 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Anthropocene Coasts Pub Date : 2023-03-20 DOI:10.1139/anc-2020-0006
Wout M. van Dijk, Jana R. Cox, Jasper R. F. W. Leuven, Jelmer Cleveringa, Marcel Taal, Matthew R. Hiatt, Willem Sonke, Kevin Verbeek, Bettina Speckmann, Maarten G. Kleinhans
{"title":"滩涂和多通道河口易受疏浚和处置的影响","authors":"Wout M. van Dijk,&nbsp;Jana R. Cox,&nbsp;Jasper R. F. W. Leuven,&nbsp;Jelmer Cleveringa,&nbsp;Marcel Taal,&nbsp;Matthew R. Hiatt,&nbsp;Willem Sonke,&nbsp;Kevin Verbeek,&nbsp;Bettina Speckmann,&nbsp;Maarten G. Kleinhans","doi":"10.1139/anc-2020-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Shipping fairways in estuaries are continuously dredged to maintain access for large vessels to major ports. However, several estuaries worldwide show adverse side effects to dredging activities, in particular affecting morphology and ecologically valuable habitats. We used physical scale experiments, field assessments of the Western Scheldt estuary (the Netherlands), and morphodynamic model runs to analyse the effects of dredging and future stresses (climate and sediment management) on a multi-channel system and its ecologically valuable intertidal flats. All methods indicate that dredging and disposal strategies are unfavourable to long-term morphology because dredging creates and propagates the imbalance between shallow and deeper parts of the estuary, causing a loss of valuable connecting channels and fixation of the tidal flats and main channel positions, while countering adverse effects by disposal strategy has limited effectiveness. Changing the disposal strategy towards main channel scour disposal can be economically and ecologically beneficial for the preservation of the multi-channel system. Further channel deepening will accelerate the adverse side effects, whereas future sea-level rise may revive the multi-channel system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100098,"journal":{"name":"Anthropocene Coasts","volume":"4 1","pages":"36 - 60"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The vulnerability of tidal flats and multi-channel estuaries to dredging and disposal\",\"authors\":\"Wout M. van Dijk,&nbsp;Jana R. Cox,&nbsp;Jasper R. F. W. Leuven,&nbsp;Jelmer Cleveringa,&nbsp;Marcel Taal,&nbsp;Matthew R. Hiatt,&nbsp;Willem Sonke,&nbsp;Kevin Verbeek,&nbsp;Bettina Speckmann,&nbsp;Maarten G. Kleinhans\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/anc-2020-0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Shipping fairways in estuaries are continuously dredged to maintain access for large vessels to major ports. However, several estuaries worldwide show adverse side effects to dredging activities, in particular affecting morphology and ecologically valuable habitats. We used physical scale experiments, field assessments of the Western Scheldt estuary (the Netherlands), and morphodynamic model runs to analyse the effects of dredging and future stresses (climate and sediment management) on a multi-channel system and its ecologically valuable intertidal flats. All methods indicate that dredging and disposal strategies are unfavourable to long-term morphology because dredging creates and propagates the imbalance between shallow and deeper parts of the estuary, causing a loss of valuable connecting channels and fixation of the tidal flats and main channel positions, while countering adverse effects by disposal strategy has limited effectiveness. Changing the disposal strategy towards main channel scour disposal can be economically and ecologically beneficial for the preservation of the multi-channel system. Further channel deepening will accelerate the adverse side effects, whereas future sea-level rise may revive the multi-channel system.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropocene Coasts\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"36 - 60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropocene Coasts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1139/anc-2020-0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropocene Coasts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1139/anc-2020-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

河口的航道不断疏浚,以保持大型船只进入主要港口。然而,世界各地的几个河口对疏浚活动产生了不利的副作用,特别是影响了形态和生态价值栖息地。我们使用物理尺度实验、西舍尔德河口(荷兰)的实地评估和形态动力学模型运行来分析疏浚和未来应力(气候和沉积物管理)对多通道系统及其具有生态价值的潮间带的影响。所有方法都表明,疏浚和处置策略不利于长期形态,因为疏浚造成并传播了河口浅部和深部之间的不平衡,导致失去了宝贵的连接通道以及滩涂和主航道位置的固定,而处置策略对抗不利影响的效果有限。将处理策略改为主渠道冲刷处理,对保护多渠道系统具有经济和生态效益。海峡的进一步加深将加速不利的副作用,而未来海平面的上升可能会使多通道系统复活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The vulnerability of tidal flats and multi-channel estuaries to dredging and disposal

Shipping fairways in estuaries are continuously dredged to maintain access for large vessels to major ports. However, several estuaries worldwide show adverse side effects to dredging activities, in particular affecting morphology and ecologically valuable habitats. We used physical scale experiments, field assessments of the Western Scheldt estuary (the Netherlands), and morphodynamic model runs to analyse the effects of dredging and future stresses (climate and sediment management) on a multi-channel system and its ecologically valuable intertidal flats. All methods indicate that dredging and disposal strategies are unfavourable to long-term morphology because dredging creates and propagates the imbalance between shallow and deeper parts of the estuary, causing a loss of valuable connecting channels and fixation of the tidal flats and main channel positions, while countering adverse effects by disposal strategy has limited effectiveness. Changing the disposal strategy towards main channel scour disposal can be economically and ecologically beneficial for the preservation of the multi-channel system. Further channel deepening will accelerate the adverse side effects, whereas future sea-level rise may revive the multi-channel system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Heavy metals in core sediments from the western Bay of Bengal: implications on historical pollution, eco-environmental risks, and potential sources Socio-economic risk assessment of the setback zone in beaches threatened by sea level rise induced retreat (Peloponnese coast- Eastern Mediterranean) Impacts of a growing population on the coastal environment of the Bay of Bengal Mapping coastal resilience: a Gis-based Bayesian network approach to coastal hazard identification for Queensland’s dynamic shorelines Effects of nourished beach morphology on storm response
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1