混合杀生物剂GCSC BtA对中国东南部不同节肢动物目蔬菜害虫的有效性†

C. Sengonca, B. Liu, Y. J. Zhu
{"title":"混合杀生物剂GCSC BtA对中国东南部不同节肢动物目蔬菜害虫的有效性†","authors":"C. Sengonca,&nbsp;B. Liu,&nbsp;Y. J. Zhu","doi":"10.1111/j.1493-0280.2001.01012.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present paper deals with the efficiency of the mixed biocide GCSC-BtA against vegetable pests of five orders of arthropod insects in the south-eastern China, i. e., diamondback moth, <i>Plutella xylostella</i> (L.); green peach aphid, <i>Myzus persicae</i> (Sulzer); yellow-fanded flea beetle, <i>Phyllotreta vittata</i> Fabricius; vegetable leaf miner, <i>Phytomyza nigricornis</i> Macquart; and vegetable spider mite, <i>Tetranychus neocaledonicus</i> Andre. The results show that the mixed biocide GCSC-BtA has a higher efficacy of control against all of the five pests than the commercial biocide <i>B.t.</i> and insecticide Diazinon. GCSC-BtA gave a higher mortality value of 92.18 % against <i>P. xylostella</i> as compared to the biocide <i>B.t.</i> with a value of 64.70 % and Diazinon with a value of 50.00 %. Similar mortalities were obtained with the other four pests regarding the efficacy of the three products tested against them.</p><p>The concentration-mortality regression equations were calculated by the probit analysis, from which the average mortalities were calculated. The values calculated for GCSC-BtA were 81.13 % for <i>P. xylostella</i>, 75 % for <i>M. persicae</i> and <i>T. neocaledonicus</i>, 69.23 % for <i>P. vittata</i>, and 61.03 % for <i>P. nigricornis</i> as compared to those caused by Diazinon: 33.33 %, 27.42 %, 66.31 %, 44.54 %, 19.65 % for <i>P. xylostella, M. persicae, P. vittata, P. nigricornis</i>, and <i>T. neocaledonicus, </i> respectively. Based on LC<sub>50</sub>, <i>P. xylostella</i> was most susceptible to GCSC-BtA with a LC<sub>50</sub> value of 0.3445, followed by <i>B.t.</i> with a value of 0.8404 and Diazinon with a value of 1.3160. The LC<sub>50</sub> value of GCSC-BtA for <i>M. persicae</i> was 0.4660 which was about three times less than that of Diazinon. LC<sub>50</sub> value of GCSC-BtA for <i>P. vittata</i> was 0.3954 which was about the same as that of Diazinon. <i>P. nigricornis</i> and <i>T. neocaledonicus</i> were also much more susceptible to GCSC-BtA than to <i>B.t.</i> and Diazinon. It is concluded that GCSC-BtA kills more target pests than <i>B.t.</i> and is more effective than Diazinon in controlling the vegetable pests.</p>","PeriodicalId":100103,"journal":{"name":"Anzeiger für Sch?dlingskunde","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1493-0280.2001.01012.x","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency of the mixed biocide GCSC-BtA against vegetable pests of different arthropod orders in the south-eastern China†\",\"authors\":\"C. Sengonca,&nbsp;B. Liu,&nbsp;Y. J. Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1493-0280.2001.01012.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The present paper deals with the efficiency of the mixed biocide GCSC-BtA against vegetable pests of five orders of arthropod insects in the south-eastern China, i. e., diamondback moth, <i>Plutella xylostella</i> (L.); green peach aphid, <i>Myzus persicae</i> (Sulzer); yellow-fanded flea beetle, <i>Phyllotreta vittata</i> Fabricius; vegetable leaf miner, <i>Phytomyza nigricornis</i> Macquart; and vegetable spider mite, <i>Tetranychus neocaledonicus</i> Andre. The results show that the mixed biocide GCSC-BtA has a higher efficacy of control against all of the five pests than the commercial biocide <i>B.t.</i> and insecticide Diazinon. GCSC-BtA gave a higher mortality value of 92.18 % against <i>P. xylostella</i> as compared to the biocide <i>B.t.</i> with a value of 64.70 % and Diazinon with a value of 50.00 %. Similar mortalities were obtained with the other four pests regarding the efficacy of the three products tested against them.</p><p>The concentration-mortality regression equations were calculated by the probit analysis, from which the average mortalities were calculated. The values calculated for GCSC-BtA were 81.13 % for <i>P. xylostella</i>, 75 % for <i>M. persicae</i> and <i>T. neocaledonicus</i>, 69.23 % for <i>P. vittata</i>, and 61.03 % for <i>P. nigricornis</i> as compared to those caused by Diazinon: 33.33 %, 27.42 %, 66.31 %, 44.54 %, 19.65 % for <i>P. xylostella, M. persicae, P. vittata, P. nigricornis</i>, and <i>T. neocaledonicus, </i> respectively. Based on LC<sub>50</sub>, <i>P. xylostella</i> was most susceptible to GCSC-BtA with a LC<sub>50</sub> value of 0.3445, followed by <i>B.t.</i> with a value of 0.8404 and Diazinon with a value of 1.3160. The LC<sub>50</sub> value of GCSC-BtA for <i>M. persicae</i> was 0.4660 which was about three times less than that of Diazinon. LC<sub>50</sub> value of GCSC-BtA for <i>P. vittata</i> was 0.3954 which was about the same as that of Diazinon. <i>P. nigricornis</i> and <i>T. neocaledonicus</i> were also much more susceptible to GCSC-BtA than to <i>B.t.</i> and Diazinon. It is concluded that GCSC-BtA kills more target pests than <i>B.t.</i> and is more effective than Diazinon in controlling the vegetable pests.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anzeiger für Sch?dlingskunde\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1493-0280.2001.01012.x\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anzeiger für Sch?dlingskunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1493-0280.2001.01012.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anzeiger für Sch?dlingskunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1493-0280.2001.01012.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了混合杀菌剂GCSC-BtA对我国东南地区5目节肢动物害虫的杀灭效果。 小菜蛾、小菜蛾;桃蚜;黄色扇形跳蚤甲虫Phyllotreta vittata Fabricius;蔬菜潜叶蝇Phytomyza nigricornis Macquart;和蔬菜蜘蛛螨,新冠叶螨。结果表明,混合杀生物剂GCSC BtA对所有五种害虫的防治效果均高于商业杀生物剂B.t.和杀虫剂Diazinon。GCSC BtA的死亡率较高,为92.18 % 与杀生物剂B.t.相比,对小菜蛾的抗性为64.70 % 和值为50.00的二嗪农 %. 在测试的三种产品对其他四种害虫的疗效方面,也获得了类似的死亡率。通过概率分析计算浓度-死亡率回归方程,由此计算平均死亡率。GCSC BtA的计算值为81.13 % 小菜蛾,75 % 对于M.persicae和T.neocaledonicus,69.23 % 对于P.vittata,和61.03 % 与二嗪农引起的黑皮病相比:33.33 %, 27.42 %, 66.31 %, 44.54 %, 19.65 % 分别为小菜蛾、桃蚜、维特塔蚜、黑灰蝶和新灰蝶。基于LC50,小菜蛾最易受到GCSC BtA的影响,LC50值为0.3445,其次是B.t.,其值为0.8404,二嗪农的值为1.3160。GCSC BtA对桃蚜的LC50值为0.4660,约为二嗪农的三倍。黄颡鱼GCSC BtA的LC50值为0.3954,与二嗪农相近。与B.T.和Diazinon相比,P.nigricornis和T.negataledonicus对GCSC BtA也更敏感。结果表明,GCSC BtA比B.t.能杀死更多的目标害虫,并且在控制蔬菜害虫方面比双嘧磺隆更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficiency of the mixed biocide GCSC-BtA against vegetable pests of different arthropod orders in the south-eastern China†

The present paper deals with the efficiency of the mixed biocide GCSC-BtA against vegetable pests of five orders of arthropod insects in the south-eastern China, i. e., diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.); green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer); yellow-fanded flea beetle, Phyllotreta vittata Fabricius; vegetable leaf miner, Phytomyza nigricornis Macquart; and vegetable spider mite, Tetranychus neocaledonicus Andre. The results show that the mixed biocide GCSC-BtA has a higher efficacy of control against all of the five pests than the commercial biocide B.t. and insecticide Diazinon. GCSC-BtA gave a higher mortality value of 92.18 % against P. xylostella as compared to the biocide B.t. with a value of 64.70 % and Diazinon with a value of 50.00 %. Similar mortalities were obtained with the other four pests regarding the efficacy of the three products tested against them.

The concentration-mortality regression equations were calculated by the probit analysis, from which the average mortalities were calculated. The values calculated for GCSC-BtA were 81.13 % for P. xylostella, 75 % for M. persicae and T. neocaledonicus, 69.23 % for P. vittata, and 61.03 % for P. nigricornis as compared to those caused by Diazinon: 33.33 %, 27.42 %, 66.31 %, 44.54 %, 19.65 % for P. xylostella, M. persicae, P. vittata, P. nigricornis, and T. neocaledonicus, respectively. Based on LC50, P. xylostella was most susceptible to GCSC-BtA with a LC50 value of 0.3445, followed by B.t. with a value of 0.8404 and Diazinon with a value of 1.3160. The LC50 value of GCSC-BtA for M. persicae was 0.4660 which was about three times less than that of Diazinon. LC50 value of GCSC-BtA for P. vittata was 0.3954 which was about the same as that of Diazinon. P. nigricornis and T. neocaledonicus were also much more susceptible to GCSC-BtA than to B.t. and Diazinon. It is concluded that GCSC-BtA kills more target pests than B.t. and is more effective than Diazinon in controlling the vegetable pests.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Untersuchungen zur überlebensfähigkeit und Entwicklung der Larven zweier Herkünfte des Schwammspinners Lymantria dispar L. (Lep.: Lymantriidae) in Abhängigkeit von der Fraßpflanze* Studies on the suitability of trap-tubs to control noxious rodents in forests Studies on the parasitoids of Gelechia senticetella (Stgr.) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in Bulgaria Biologischer Pflanzenschutz Reproductive potential of the parasitic wasp Microplitis rufiventris Kok. (Hym.: Braconidae), reared in hosts treated with chitin synthesis inhibitors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1