心肌梗死的心脏干细胞治疗:临床前研究的系统综述和荟萃分析方案

P. P. Zwetsloot, S. J. Jansen of Lorkeers, A. M. D. Végh, G. P. J. van Hout, G. L. Currie, M. J. Goumans, S. A. J. Chamuleau, J. P. G. Sluijter
{"title":"心肌梗死的心脏干细胞治疗:临床前研究的系统综述和荟萃分析方案","authors":"P. P. Zwetsloot,&nbsp;S. J. Jansen of Lorkeers,&nbsp;A. M. D. Végh,&nbsp;G. P. J. van Hout,&nbsp;G. L. Currie,&nbsp;M. J. Goumans,&nbsp;S. A. J. Chamuleau,&nbsp;J. P. G. Sluijter","doi":"10.1002/ebm2.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Cardiac-derived stem or progenitor cells (CSCs) have emerged as a possible therapeutic intervention for myocardial infarction, potentially ameliorating the devastating effects caused by inadequate blood flow to the heart. The first human clinical trials using these myocardial-derived cells have recently started, but scientific controversy exists regarding the efficacy and origin of some of these stem cells in preclinical animal models. Systematic review of the current literature on CSCs in ischaemic cardiomyopathy can provide useful additional information on the use of CSCs in preclinical trials. By combining all available data, we can adequately compare the different types of cells being used and possibly identify factors that influence cardiac stem cell therapy in general. This protocol provides a thorough description of the methodology that will be used in our systematic review and meta-analysis of all preclinical animal studies involving cardiac stem cell treatment for ischaemic cardiomyopathy.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":90826,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based preclinical medicine","volume":"2 1","pages":"10-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebm2.9","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiac stem cell treatment in myocardial infarction: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies\",\"authors\":\"P. P. Zwetsloot,&nbsp;S. J. Jansen of Lorkeers,&nbsp;A. M. D. Végh,&nbsp;G. P. J. van Hout,&nbsp;G. L. Currie,&nbsp;M. J. Goumans,&nbsp;S. A. J. Chamuleau,&nbsp;J. P. G. Sluijter\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ebm2.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Cardiac-derived stem or progenitor cells (CSCs) have emerged as a possible therapeutic intervention for myocardial infarction, potentially ameliorating the devastating effects caused by inadequate blood flow to the heart. The first human clinical trials using these myocardial-derived cells have recently started, but scientific controversy exists regarding the efficacy and origin of some of these stem cells in preclinical animal models. Systematic review of the current literature on CSCs in ischaemic cardiomyopathy can provide useful additional information on the use of CSCs in preclinical trials. By combining all available data, we can adequately compare the different types of cells being used and possibly identify factors that influence cardiac stem cell therapy in general. This protocol provides a thorough description of the methodology that will be used in our systematic review and meta-analysis of all preclinical animal studies involving cardiac stem cell treatment for ischaemic cardiomyopathy.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence-based preclinical medicine\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"10-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebm2.9\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence-based preclinical medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ebm2.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based preclinical medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ebm2.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

心脏来源的干细胞或祖细胞(CSCs)已成为心肌梗死的一种可能的治疗干预措施,有可能改善心脏供血不足造成的破坏性影响。使用这些心肌衍生细胞的首次人体临床试验最近已经开始,但关于其中一些干细胞在临床前动物模型中的功效和来源,存在科学争议。系统回顾目前关于CSCs在缺血性心肌病中的文献,可以为CSCs在临床前试验中的应用提供有用的额外信息。通过结合所有可用的数据,我们可以充分比较所使用的不同类型的细胞,并可能确定影响心脏干细胞治疗的因素。该方案提供了对方法的全面描述,将用于我们对所有涉及心脏干细胞治疗缺血性心肌病的临床前动物研究的系统综述和荟萃分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cardiac stem cell treatment in myocardial infarction: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies

Cardiac-derived stem or progenitor cells (CSCs) have emerged as a possible therapeutic intervention for myocardial infarction, potentially ameliorating the devastating effects caused by inadequate blood flow to the heart. The first human clinical trials using these myocardial-derived cells have recently started, but scientific controversy exists regarding the efficacy and origin of some of these stem cells in preclinical animal models. Systematic review of the current literature on CSCs in ischaemic cardiomyopathy can provide useful additional information on the use of CSCs in preclinical trials. By combining all available data, we can adequately compare the different types of cells being used and possibly identify factors that influence cardiac stem cell therapy in general. This protocol provides a thorough description of the methodology that will be used in our systematic review and meta-analysis of all preclinical animal studies involving cardiac stem cell treatment for ischaemic cardiomyopathy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving our understanding of the in vivo modelling of psychotic disorders: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Study protocol – A systematic review and meta‐analysis of hypothermia in experimental traumatic brain injury: Why have promising animal studies not been replicated in pragmatic clinical trials? Protocol for a systematic review of effect sizes and statistical power in the rodent fear conditioning literature From a mouse: systematic analysis reveals limitations of experiments testing interventions in Alzheimer's disease mouse models Protocol for meta-analysis of temperature reduction in animal models of cardiac arrest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1