SeparGateTM球囊导管在神经介入手术中的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性、多中心、单臂临床试验

Huan Liu , Rufeng Jia , Yanyan He , Tengfei Zhou , Liangfu Zhu , Yonghong Ding , Juha Antero Hernesniemi , Tianxiao Li , Yingkun He
{"title":"SeparGateTM球囊导管在神经介入手术中的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性、多中心、单臂临床试验","authors":"Huan Liu ,&nbsp;Rufeng Jia ,&nbsp;Yanyan He ,&nbsp;Tengfei Zhou ,&nbsp;Liangfu Zhu ,&nbsp;Yonghong Ding ,&nbsp;Juha Antero Hernesniemi ,&nbsp;Tianxiao Li ,&nbsp;Yingkun He","doi":"10.1016/j.jimed.2022.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the SeparGate™ balloon-guiding catheter (BGC) for blocking flow and delivering devices in neurointerventional surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>This prospective multicenter single-arm trial enrolled patients who received BGC adjuvant therapy to provide temporary blood flow arrest of the supra-aortic arch arteries and their branch vessels in interventional therapy. The primary endpoint was immediate procedural success rate in flow arrest, device delivery, and withdrawal. The efficacy endpoints were intraoperative product performance, including rigidity, smoothness, fracture resistance of the catheter wall, catheter push performance, compatibility and radiopaque display, integrity, adhesion thrombus after withdrawal and balloon rupture. The safety endpoints were adverse and serious adverse events associated with the test device and serious adverse events resulting in death or serious health deterioration.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>A total of 129 patients were included; of them, 128 were analyzed in the full analysis set (FAS) and per protocol set (PPS). Immediate procedural success was achieved in 97.7% of patients with FAS and PPS. The lower bound of the 95% confidence interval was 94.6%, higher than the preset efficacy margin of 94%. Device-related adverse events occurred in 2 (1.6%) cases. One was mild adverse event of vasospasm, which resolved spontaneously. The other was serious adverse event of dissection aggravation, which was treated with stenting angioplasty. No device defects were observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In neurointerventional surgery, the SeparGate™ BGC can be used to temporarily block the flow of the supra-aortic arch arteries and their branch vessels and guide the interventional device to the target vascular position.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Medicine","volume":"5 3","pages":"Pages 143-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096360222000370/pdfft?md5=541fa88b9bdf8dffc357adec445b9ed0&pid=1-s2.0-S2096360222000370-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of the SeparGateTM balloon-guiding catheter in neurointerventional surgery: A prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Huan Liu ,&nbsp;Rufeng Jia ,&nbsp;Yanyan He ,&nbsp;Tengfei Zhou ,&nbsp;Liangfu Zhu ,&nbsp;Yonghong Ding ,&nbsp;Juha Antero Hernesniemi ,&nbsp;Tianxiao Li ,&nbsp;Yingkun He\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jimed.2022.06.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the SeparGate™ balloon-guiding catheter (BGC) for blocking flow and delivering devices in neurointerventional surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>This prospective multicenter single-arm trial enrolled patients who received BGC adjuvant therapy to provide temporary blood flow arrest of the supra-aortic arch arteries and their branch vessels in interventional therapy. The primary endpoint was immediate procedural success rate in flow arrest, device delivery, and withdrawal. The efficacy endpoints were intraoperative product performance, including rigidity, smoothness, fracture resistance of the catheter wall, catheter push performance, compatibility and radiopaque display, integrity, adhesion thrombus after withdrawal and balloon rupture. The safety endpoints were adverse and serious adverse events associated with the test device and serious adverse events resulting in death or serious health deterioration.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>A total of 129 patients were included; of them, 128 were analyzed in the full analysis set (FAS) and per protocol set (PPS). Immediate procedural success was achieved in 97.7% of patients with FAS and PPS. The lower bound of the 95% confidence interval was 94.6%, higher than the preset efficacy margin of 94%. Device-related adverse events occurred in 2 (1.6%) cases. One was mild adverse event of vasospasm, which resolved spontaneously. The other was serious adverse event of dissection aggravation, which was treated with stenting angioplasty. No device defects were observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In neurointerventional surgery, the SeparGate™ BGC can be used to temporarily block the flow of the supra-aortic arch arteries and their branch vessels and guide the interventional device to the target vascular position.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interventional Medicine\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 143-147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096360222000370/pdfft?md5=541fa88b9bdf8dffc357adec445b9ed0&pid=1-s2.0-S2096360222000370-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interventional Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096360222000370\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096360222000370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价SeparGate的安全性和有效性™ 用于神经介入手术中阻断血流和输送装置的球囊引导导管(BGC)。方法本前瞻性多中心单臂试验纳入接受BGC辅助治疗的患者,在介入治疗中对主动脉弓上动脉及其分支血管进行临时性血流阻断。主要终点是血流阻断、器械输送和退出的即时手术成功率。疗效终点为术中产品性能,包括导管壁的硬度、光滑度、抗骨折性、导管推动性能、兼容性和不透射线显示、完整性、拔出和球囊破裂后的粘附性血栓。安全性终点是与试验装置相关的不良和严重不良事件,以及导致死亡或严重健康恶化的严重不良事件。结果共纳入129例患者;其中128例采用全分析集(FAS)和按方案集(PPS)进行分析。97.7%的FAS和PPS患者立即获得了手术成功。95%置信区间的下限为94.6%,高于预设的94%的有效性范围。2例(1.6%)发生了与器械相关的不良事件。一个是轻微的血管痉挛不良事件,该事件自行缓解。另一例为夹层加重的严重不良事件,采用支架成形术治疗。未观察到器件缺陷。结论在神经介入手术中,SeparGate™ BGC可用于暂时阻断主动脉弓上动脉及其分支血管的流动,并将介入装置引导至目标血管位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety and efficacy of the SeparGateTM balloon-guiding catheter in neurointerventional surgery: A prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the SeparGate™ balloon-guiding catheter (BGC) for blocking flow and delivering devices in neurointerventional surgery.

Method

This prospective multicenter single-arm trial enrolled patients who received BGC adjuvant therapy to provide temporary blood flow arrest of the supra-aortic arch arteries and their branch vessels in interventional therapy. The primary endpoint was immediate procedural success rate in flow arrest, device delivery, and withdrawal. The efficacy endpoints were intraoperative product performance, including rigidity, smoothness, fracture resistance of the catheter wall, catheter push performance, compatibility and radiopaque display, integrity, adhesion thrombus after withdrawal and balloon rupture. The safety endpoints were adverse and serious adverse events associated with the test device and serious adverse events resulting in death or serious health deterioration.

Result

A total of 129 patients were included; of them, 128 were analyzed in the full analysis set (FAS) and per protocol set (PPS). Immediate procedural success was achieved in 97.7% of patients with FAS and PPS. The lower bound of the 95% confidence interval was 94.6%, higher than the preset efficacy margin of 94%. Device-related adverse events occurred in 2 (1.6%) cases. One was mild adverse event of vasospasm, which resolved spontaneously. The other was serious adverse event of dissection aggravation, which was treated with stenting angioplasty. No device defects were observed.

Conclusion

In neurointerventional surgery, the SeparGate™ BGC can be used to temporarily block the flow of the supra-aortic arch arteries and their branch vessels and guide the interventional device to the target vascular position.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Interventional Medicine
Journal of Interventional Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
68 days
期刊最新文献
Baseline parameters of spectral CT could predict tumor response to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma patients Validation of the CRAFITY score for predicting prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization combined with systemic therapy Diagnostic radiology: The essential for effective and safe practice of interventional radiology Percutaneous radiofrequency and microwave ablation for renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma with refractory hematuria: A case report Combination of transarterial radioembolization with atezolizumab and bevacizumab for intermediate and advanced staged hepatocellular carcinoma: A preliminary report of safety and feasibility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1