James O'Bryan, Narayanan Sadagopan, Emily Winslow, Pejman Radkani, Thomas Fishbein, Filip Banovac, Emil Cohen, Marion L Hartley, Aiwu Ruth He
{"title":"肝内胆管癌的手术切除标准和新辅助治疗。","authors":"James O'Bryan, Narayanan Sadagopan, Emily Winslow, Pejman Radkani, Thomas Fishbein, Filip Banovac, Emil Cohen, Marion L Hartley, Aiwu Ruth He","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The staging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is complex, and there is no consensus among international cancer groups on how to most appropriately select candidates with nonmetastatic disease for surgical resection. Factors contributing to a higher stage of disease include larger tumor size, multiple tumors, vascular invasion (either portal venous or arterial), biliary invasion, involvement of local hepatic structures, serosal invasion, and regional lymph node metastases. For patients selected to undergo surgery, it is well-documented that R0 resection translates to a survival benefit. Estimating the risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure and post-surgical residual liver function is vital and may preclude some patients with significant tumor burden from undergoing surgery. Numerous serum and biliary biomarkers of the disease can help detect recurrence in patients undergoing surgical resection. Systemic and locoregional neoadjuvant treatments to facilitate better surgical outcomes have yielded mixed results regarding improving resectability and overall survival. Additional research is needed to identify optimal neoadjuvant treatment approaches and to evaluate which patients will benefit most from these strategies. Therapies targeting genetic mutations and protein aberrations found by tumor molecular profiling may offer additional options for future neoadjuvant treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":51585,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Advances in Hematology & Oncology","volume":"21 11","pages":"584-591"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical resection criteria and neoadjuvant therapies for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"James O'Bryan, Narayanan Sadagopan, Emily Winslow, Pejman Radkani, Thomas Fishbein, Filip Banovac, Emil Cohen, Marion L Hartley, Aiwu Ruth He\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The staging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is complex, and there is no consensus among international cancer groups on how to most appropriately select candidates with nonmetastatic disease for surgical resection. Factors contributing to a higher stage of disease include larger tumor size, multiple tumors, vascular invasion (either portal venous or arterial), biliary invasion, involvement of local hepatic structures, serosal invasion, and regional lymph node metastases. For patients selected to undergo surgery, it is well-documented that R0 resection translates to a survival benefit. Estimating the risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure and post-surgical residual liver function is vital and may preclude some patients with significant tumor burden from undergoing surgery. Numerous serum and biliary biomarkers of the disease can help detect recurrence in patients undergoing surgical resection. Systemic and locoregional neoadjuvant treatments to facilitate better surgical outcomes have yielded mixed results regarding improving resectability and overall survival. Additional research is needed to identify optimal neoadjuvant treatment approaches and to evaluate which patients will benefit most from these strategies. Therapies targeting genetic mutations and protein aberrations found by tumor molecular profiling may offer additional options for future neoadjuvant treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Advances in Hematology & Oncology\",\"volume\":\"21 11\",\"pages\":\"584-591\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Advances in Hematology & Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Advances in Hematology & Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Surgical resection criteria and neoadjuvant therapies for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
The staging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is complex, and there is no consensus among international cancer groups on how to most appropriately select candidates with nonmetastatic disease for surgical resection. Factors contributing to a higher stage of disease include larger tumor size, multiple tumors, vascular invasion (either portal venous or arterial), biliary invasion, involvement of local hepatic structures, serosal invasion, and regional lymph node metastases. For patients selected to undergo surgery, it is well-documented that R0 resection translates to a survival benefit. Estimating the risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure and post-surgical residual liver function is vital and may preclude some patients with significant tumor burden from undergoing surgery. Numerous serum and biliary biomarkers of the disease can help detect recurrence in patients undergoing surgical resection. Systemic and locoregional neoadjuvant treatments to facilitate better surgical outcomes have yielded mixed results regarding improving resectability and overall survival. Additional research is needed to identify optimal neoadjuvant treatment approaches and to evaluate which patients will benefit most from these strategies. Therapies targeting genetic mutations and protein aberrations found by tumor molecular profiling may offer additional options for future neoadjuvant treatment.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Advances in Hematology & Oncology (CAH&O) is a monthly peer-reviewed journal reaching more than 27,000 hematology and oncology clinicians. CAH&O provides editorial content encompassing a wide array of topics relevant and useful to the fields of oncology and hematology, both separately and together. Content is directed by the strong input of today’s top thought leaders in hematology & oncology, including feature-length review articles, monthly columns consisting of engaging interviews with experts on current issues in solid tumor oncology, hematologic malignancies, hematologic disorders, drug development, and clinical case studies with expert commentary. CAH&O also publishes industry-supported meeting highlights, clinical roundtable monographs, and clinical review supplements.