使用焦点小组评估患者参与决策的程度:与他们的血管接入设备相关

Katherine Nugent RN, PhD, Cynthia Chernecky RN, PhD, AOCN, Denise Macklin RN, BSN, C, CRNI (PI)
{"title":"使用焦点小组评估患者参与决策的程度:与他们的血管接入设备相关","authors":"Katherine Nugent RN, PhD, Cynthia Chernecky RN, PhD, AOCN, Denise Macklin RN, BSN, C, CRNI (PI)","doi":"10.2309/108300802775703513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T he traditional paternalistic model of medical decisionmaking, in which doctors make decisions on behalf of their patients, increasingly has come to be outdated.' Patient-centered care, patient-focused care or client-centered care describes professional health care interventions targeted at addressing the patient's needs.' Cox3.' proposed the Interaction Model of Client Health Behavior (IMCHB), which proposed that consumers of heald1 care have d1e need to be competent and self-determining in their health outcomes. This model also proposed d1at consumers of health care should be allowed d1e maximal opportunity to choose between intervention alternatives and health behaviors. This model was based upon information sharing and collaboration between the provider of health care and the consumer. Recently, health care practitioners have tried to promote patient autonomy and palticipation in clinical decision-making. This trend is based on the assumption that patient palticipation in decisions has been associated with improved patient outcomes. A model of shared decision-making is based upon the assumption d1at the patient is willing to take part in the decision-making process. A study by Mansell et at. demonstrated that although patients want their physicians to be involved in d1e decisions, almost all patients want at least some personal involvement in decisionmaking for major interventions.; However, other studies show that patients prefer that physicians have most of the control over decisions.6-10 In one study, a focus group methodology was used to determine the cancer patient's point of view concerning palticipation in decision-making.\" The results indicated that active participation of patients in care decision-making requires an environment that encourages patients to participate in their care. Also this study noted that much more attention has to be given to cancer patient participation in decision-making.\" Previous studies have demonstrated that the majority of cancer patients fail to achieve their desired level of participation during treatment decision-making.\" Purpose","PeriodicalId":100853,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access Devices","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2309/108300802775703513","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Focus Groups to Evaluate the Patient's Involvement in Decision-Making: Associated with Their Vascular Access Device\",\"authors\":\"Katherine Nugent RN, PhD, Cynthia Chernecky RN, PhD, AOCN, Denise Macklin RN, BSN, C, CRNI (PI)\",\"doi\":\"10.2309/108300802775703513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"T he traditional paternalistic model of medical decisionmaking, in which doctors make decisions on behalf of their patients, increasingly has come to be outdated.' Patient-centered care, patient-focused care or client-centered care describes professional health care interventions targeted at addressing the patient's needs.' Cox3.' proposed the Interaction Model of Client Health Behavior (IMCHB), which proposed that consumers of heald1 care have d1e need to be competent and self-determining in their health outcomes. This model also proposed d1at consumers of health care should be allowed d1e maximal opportunity to choose between intervention alternatives and health behaviors. This model was based upon information sharing and collaboration between the provider of health care and the consumer. Recently, health care practitioners have tried to promote patient autonomy and palticipation in clinical decision-making. This trend is based on the assumption that patient palticipation in decisions has been associated with improved patient outcomes. A model of shared decision-making is based upon the assumption d1at the patient is willing to take part in the decision-making process. A study by Mansell et at. demonstrated that although patients want their physicians to be involved in d1e decisions, almost all patients want at least some personal involvement in decisionmaking for major interventions.; However, other studies show that patients prefer that physicians have most of the control over decisions.6-10 In one study, a focus group methodology was used to determine the cancer patient's point of view concerning palticipation in decision-making.\\\" The results indicated that active participation of patients in care decision-making requires an environment that encourages patients to participate in their care. Also this study noted that much more attention has to be given to cancer patient participation in decision-making.\\\" Previous studies have demonstrated that the majority of cancer patients fail to achieve their desired level of participation during treatment decision-making.\\\" Purpose\",\"PeriodicalId\":100853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Access Devices\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2309/108300802775703513\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Access Devices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1083008102705347\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access Devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1083008102705347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using Focus Groups to Evaluate the Patient's Involvement in Decision-Making: Associated with Their Vascular Access Device
T he traditional paternalistic model of medical decisionmaking, in which doctors make decisions on behalf of their patients, increasingly has come to be outdated.' Patient-centered care, patient-focused care or client-centered care describes professional health care interventions targeted at addressing the patient's needs.' Cox3.' proposed the Interaction Model of Client Health Behavior (IMCHB), which proposed that consumers of heald1 care have d1e need to be competent and self-determining in their health outcomes. This model also proposed d1at consumers of health care should be allowed d1e maximal opportunity to choose between intervention alternatives and health behaviors. This model was based upon information sharing and collaboration between the provider of health care and the consumer. Recently, health care practitioners have tried to promote patient autonomy and palticipation in clinical decision-making. This trend is based on the assumption that patient palticipation in decisions has been associated with improved patient outcomes. A model of shared decision-making is based upon the assumption d1at the patient is willing to take part in the decision-making process. A study by Mansell et at. demonstrated that although patients want their physicians to be involved in d1e decisions, almost all patients want at least some personal involvement in decisionmaking for major interventions.; However, other studies show that patients prefer that physicians have most of the control over decisions.6-10 In one study, a focus group methodology was used to determine the cancer patient's point of view concerning palticipation in decision-making." The results indicated that active participation of patients in care decision-making requires an environment that encourages patients to participate in their care. Also this study noted that much more attention has to be given to cancer patient participation in decision-making." Previous studies have demonstrated that the majority of cancer patients fail to achieve their desired level of participation during treatment decision-making." Purpose
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Desirable Properties for Vascular Catheter Materials: A Review of Silicone and Polyurethane Materials in IV Catheters Management Issues Surrounding Venous Access in Disorders of Coagulation von Willebrand's Disease Case Presentation von Willebrand's Disease Case Presentation A Retrospective Evaluation of the Timeliness of Physician Initiated PICC Referrals: A Continuous Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement Study Assessing catheter performance: Four years of tracking patient outcomes of midline, midclavicular and PICC line program What's Physics Got To Do With It? A Review of the Physical Principles of Fluid Administration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1