BCA:用于法律问答的双线性卷积神经网络和注意力网络

Haiguang Zhang, Tongyue Zhang, Faxin Cao, Zhizheng Wang, Yuanyu Zhang, Yuanyuan Sun, Mark Anthony Vicente
{"title":"BCA:用于法律问答的双线性卷积神经网络和注意力网络","authors":"Haiguang Zhang,&nbsp;Tongyue Zhang,&nbsp;Faxin Cao,&nbsp;Zhizheng Wang,&nbsp;Yuanyu Zhang,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Sun,&nbsp;Mark Anthony Vicente","doi":"10.1016/j.aiopen.2022.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The National Judicial Examination of China is an essential examination for selecting legal practitioners. In recent years, people have tried to use machine learning algorithms to answer examination questions. With the proposal of JEC-QA (Zhong et al. 2020), the judicial examination becomes a particular legal task. The data of judicial examination contains two types, i.e., Knowledge-Driven questions and Case-Analysis questions. Both require complex reasoning and text comprehension, thus challenging computers to answer judicial examination questions. We propose <strong>B</strong>ilinear <strong>C</strong>onvolutional Neural Networks and <strong>A</strong>ttention Networks (<strong>BCA</strong>) in this paper, which is an improved version based on the model proposed by our team on the Challenge of AI in Law 2021 judicial examination task. It has two essential modules, <strong>K</strong>nowledge-<strong>D</strong>riven <strong>M</strong>odule (<strong>KDM</strong>) for local features extraction and <strong>C</strong>ase-<strong>A</strong>nalysis <strong>M</strong>odule (<strong>CAM</strong>) for the semantic difference clarification between the question stem and the options. We also add a post-processing module to correct the results in the final stage. The experimental results show that our system achieves state-of-the-art in the offline test of the judicial examination task.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100068,"journal":{"name":"AI Open","volume":"3 ","pages":"Pages 172-181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666651022000171/pdfft?md5=7fc8cf53d6ea6be2b3999607b407f336&pid=1-s2.0-S2666651022000171-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BCA: Bilinear Convolutional Neural Networks and Attention Networks for legal question answering\",\"authors\":\"Haiguang Zhang,&nbsp;Tongyue Zhang,&nbsp;Faxin Cao,&nbsp;Zhizheng Wang,&nbsp;Yuanyu Zhang,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Sun,&nbsp;Mark Anthony Vicente\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aiopen.2022.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The National Judicial Examination of China is an essential examination for selecting legal practitioners. In recent years, people have tried to use machine learning algorithms to answer examination questions. With the proposal of JEC-QA (Zhong et al. 2020), the judicial examination becomes a particular legal task. The data of judicial examination contains two types, i.e., Knowledge-Driven questions and Case-Analysis questions. Both require complex reasoning and text comprehension, thus challenging computers to answer judicial examination questions. We propose <strong>B</strong>ilinear <strong>C</strong>onvolutional Neural Networks and <strong>A</strong>ttention Networks (<strong>BCA</strong>) in this paper, which is an improved version based on the model proposed by our team on the Challenge of AI in Law 2021 judicial examination task. It has two essential modules, <strong>K</strong>nowledge-<strong>D</strong>riven <strong>M</strong>odule (<strong>KDM</strong>) for local features extraction and <strong>C</strong>ase-<strong>A</strong>nalysis <strong>M</strong>odule (<strong>CAM</strong>) for the semantic difference clarification between the question stem and the options. We also add a post-processing module to correct the results in the final stage. The experimental results show that our system achieves state-of-the-art in the offline test of the judicial examination task.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AI Open\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 172-181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666651022000171/pdfft?md5=7fc8cf53d6ea6be2b3999607b407f336&pid=1-s2.0-S2666651022000171-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AI Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666651022000171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666651022000171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

国家司法考试是选拔法律从业人员的重要考试。近年来,人们尝试使用机器学习算法来回答考试问题。随着JEC-QA(Zhong et al.2020)的提出,司法审查成为一项特殊的法律任务。司法考试数据分为知识驱动题和案例分析题两类。两者都需要复杂的推理和文本理解,因此对计算机回答司法考试问题具有挑战性。我们在本文中提出了双线性卷积神经网络和注意力网络(BCA),这是基于我们团队在2021年法律中人工智能挑战司法考试任务中提出的模型的改进版本。它有两个基本模块,用于局部特征提取的知识驱动模块(KDM)和用于澄清题干和选项之间语义差异的案例分析模块(CAM)。我们还添加了一个后处理模块,以在最后阶段更正结果。实验结果表明,我们的系统在司法考试任务的离线测试中达到了最先进的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BCA: Bilinear Convolutional Neural Networks and Attention Networks for legal question answering

The National Judicial Examination of China is an essential examination for selecting legal practitioners. In recent years, people have tried to use machine learning algorithms to answer examination questions. With the proposal of JEC-QA (Zhong et al. 2020), the judicial examination becomes a particular legal task. The data of judicial examination contains two types, i.e., Knowledge-Driven questions and Case-Analysis questions. Both require complex reasoning and text comprehension, thus challenging computers to answer judicial examination questions. We propose Bilinear Convolutional Neural Networks and Attention Networks (BCA) in this paper, which is an improved version based on the model proposed by our team on the Challenge of AI in Law 2021 judicial examination task. It has two essential modules, Knowledge-Driven Module (KDM) for local features extraction and Case-Analysis Module (CAM) for the semantic difference clarification between the question stem and the options. We also add a post-processing module to correct the results in the final stage. The experimental results show that our system achieves state-of-the-art in the offline test of the judicial examination task.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
45.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
GPT understands, too Adaptive negative representations for graph contrastive learning PM2.5 forecasting under distribution shift: A graph learning approach Enhancing neural network classification using fractional-order activation functions CPT: Colorful Prompt Tuning for pre-trained vision-language models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1