Study of pathways to reduce the energy consumption of the CO2 capture process by absorption-regeneration

Several industrial sectors, such as for example cement manufacturers and lime producers, produce so-called “unavoidable” CO2 emissions because these ones are intrinsically linked to the industrial process itself (decarbonation of calcium carbonate). In order to reduce these emissions, it is necessary to implement a Carbon Capture, Utilization and/or Storage (CCUS) process chain, whose step of capture, although already technologically mature (especially the absorption-regeneration process using amine(s)-based solvents), leads to very high energy consumption. Three pathways to reduce this consumption have been investigated (experimentally and/or through the development of Aspen PlusTM simulations), namely: (i) upstream of the process thanks to the increase of the flue gas CO2 content (by partial oxy-combustion and/or flue gas recirculation), (ii) within the process (using more efficient and innovative mixtures of solvents such as demixing solutions), and (iii) at the configurational level by using advanced configurations in the capture process. It emerged that the use of a demixing process such as the mixture composed of diethylethanolamine (DEEA) and methylamino-propylamine (MAPA), or the implementation of an advanced process configuration (InterCooling Absorber + Rich Vapor Compression + Rich Solvent Splitting and Preheating, with methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) + piperazine (PZ) as a solvent) are the most energy reducing pathways for the absorption-regeneration process, i.e. more than 40% in comparison with a conventional process using monoethanolamine (MEA). Moreover, from an economical point of view, and compared to a basic configuration with MEA, the demixing technology has the advantage of being able to achieve such energy performance with a more limited investment (CAPEX) (+1.6%) than with advanced process configurations (+8.8%).