管理亚洲第二语言写作中的参照运动:对教学法的启示

IF 0.3 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Writing & Pedagogy Pub Date : 2017-01-03 DOI:10.1558/WAP.27695
P. Crosthwaite
{"title":"管理亚洲第二语言写作中的参照运动:对教学法的启示","authors":"P. Crosthwaite","doi":"10.1558/WAP.27695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The introduction and tracking of discourse referents is a central feature of discourse coherence, alongside considerations for temporal, spatial and causal features. However, while much attention is usually paid to the management of temporal, spatial and causal language in L2 writing course materials and curricula, it is apparent that the appropriate management of reference in L2 writing is often overlooked. Typically associated with the label of cohesion (Halliday & Hasan, 1976), current research from pragmatics (notably Ariel, 1991, 2008, 2010) suggests that writers and readers are sensitive to the accessibility of referents in extended discourse, which is dependent on a variety of cues including salience, parallelism, number and type of competing referents, etc. The writer’s choice of referring expressions (i.e. full NP, pronoun, zero) at any given time thus reflects their belief regarding a referent’s accessibility to their intended reader. In L1 discourse, accessibility-mediated marking of reference is considered a pragmatic universal, despite different L1s marking accessibility in different ways. Recent research into L2 discourse, particularly Asian L2 discourse (e.g. Kang, 2009; AUTHOR, 2014a; Ryan, accepted, in press) has suggested that the appropriate introduction and maintenance of reference by L2 learners is problematic - despite the universal distribution of form/function found in L1 discourse – with learners often under or over-explicit in their reference management, or frequently miscommunicating entirely. This has serious implications for the overall coherence of the L2 discourse produced. The proposed paper explores the root causes of the failure of Asian EFL students to manage reference coherently in L2 writing, then focuses on how such management can be improved pedagogically. The paper proposes additions to L2 writing materials and in-class activities that would help improve L2 reference maintenance, including picture sequence descriptions, silent film retellings and collaborative writing projects designed to maximise the potential tracking of reference over extended discourse sequences.","PeriodicalId":42573,"journal":{"name":"Writing & Pedagogy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managing referential movement in Asian L2 writing: Implications for pedagogy\",\"authors\":\"P. Crosthwaite\",\"doi\":\"10.1558/WAP.27695\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The introduction and tracking of discourse referents is a central feature of discourse coherence, alongside considerations for temporal, spatial and causal features. However, while much attention is usually paid to the management of temporal, spatial and causal language in L2 writing course materials and curricula, it is apparent that the appropriate management of reference in L2 writing is often overlooked. Typically associated with the label of cohesion (Halliday & Hasan, 1976), current research from pragmatics (notably Ariel, 1991, 2008, 2010) suggests that writers and readers are sensitive to the accessibility of referents in extended discourse, which is dependent on a variety of cues including salience, parallelism, number and type of competing referents, etc. The writer’s choice of referring expressions (i.e. full NP, pronoun, zero) at any given time thus reflects their belief regarding a referent’s accessibility to their intended reader. In L1 discourse, accessibility-mediated marking of reference is considered a pragmatic universal, despite different L1s marking accessibility in different ways. Recent research into L2 discourse, particularly Asian L2 discourse (e.g. Kang, 2009; AUTHOR, 2014a; Ryan, accepted, in press) has suggested that the appropriate introduction and maintenance of reference by L2 learners is problematic - despite the universal distribution of form/function found in L1 discourse – with learners often under or over-explicit in their reference management, or frequently miscommunicating entirely. This has serious implications for the overall coherence of the L2 discourse produced. The proposed paper explores the root causes of the failure of Asian EFL students to manage reference coherently in L2 writing, then focuses on how such management can be improved pedagogically. The paper proposes additions to L2 writing materials and in-class activities that would help improve L2 reference maintenance, including picture sequence descriptions, silent film retellings and collaborative writing projects designed to maximise the potential tracking of reference over extended discourse sequences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Writing & Pedagogy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Writing & Pedagogy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1558/WAP.27695\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Writing & Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/WAP.27695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

语篇指称物的引入和追踪是语篇连贯的核心特征,同时也是对时间、空间和因果特征的考虑。然而,在二语写作教材和课程中,人们通常关注时间语言、空间语言和因果语言的管理,但很明显,二语写作中对参考的适当管理往往被忽视。通常与衔接标签有关(Halliday & Hasan, 1976),目前的语用学研究(尤其是Ariel, 1991,2008,2010)表明,作者和读者对延伸语篇中指称物的可及性很敏感,这取决于各种线索,包括显著性、平行性、竞争指称物的数量和类型等。因此,作者在任何给定时间所选择的指称表达(即全NP、代词、零)反映了他们对指称者对目标读者的可及性的信念。在母语语篇中,可及性介导的指称标记被认为是一种语用共性,尽管不同的母语以不同的方式标记可及性。最近对二语语篇,特别是亚洲二语语篇的研究(如Kang, 2009;作者,2014;Ryan(已被接受,已发表)提出,尽管在母语语篇中形式/功能的普遍分布,但二语学习者适当地引入和维护参考是有问题的,学习者往往在参考管理方面不够明确或过于明确,或者经常完全误解。这对二语语篇的整体连贯性有严重的影响。本文探讨了亚洲学生在二语写作中无法连贯地管理参考的根本原因,然后重点讨论了如何从教学上改进这种管理。本文提出了对第二语言写作材料和课堂活动的补充,这将有助于改善第二语言参考维护,包括图片序列描述,默片复述和协作写作项目,旨在最大限度地提高对扩展话语序列的参考的潜在跟踪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Managing referential movement in Asian L2 writing: Implications for pedagogy
The introduction and tracking of discourse referents is a central feature of discourse coherence, alongside considerations for temporal, spatial and causal features. However, while much attention is usually paid to the management of temporal, spatial and causal language in L2 writing course materials and curricula, it is apparent that the appropriate management of reference in L2 writing is often overlooked. Typically associated with the label of cohesion (Halliday & Hasan, 1976), current research from pragmatics (notably Ariel, 1991, 2008, 2010) suggests that writers and readers are sensitive to the accessibility of referents in extended discourse, which is dependent on a variety of cues including salience, parallelism, number and type of competing referents, etc. The writer’s choice of referring expressions (i.e. full NP, pronoun, zero) at any given time thus reflects their belief regarding a referent’s accessibility to their intended reader. In L1 discourse, accessibility-mediated marking of reference is considered a pragmatic universal, despite different L1s marking accessibility in different ways. Recent research into L2 discourse, particularly Asian L2 discourse (e.g. Kang, 2009; AUTHOR, 2014a; Ryan, accepted, in press) has suggested that the appropriate introduction and maintenance of reference by L2 learners is problematic - despite the universal distribution of form/function found in L1 discourse – with learners often under or over-explicit in their reference management, or frequently miscommunicating entirely. This has serious implications for the overall coherence of the L2 discourse produced. The proposed paper explores the root causes of the failure of Asian EFL students to manage reference coherently in L2 writing, then focuses on how such management can be improved pedagogically. The paper proposes additions to L2 writing materials and in-class activities that would help improve L2 reference maintenance, including picture sequence descriptions, silent film retellings and collaborative writing projects designed to maximise the potential tracking of reference over extended discourse sequences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Writing & Pedagogy
Writing & Pedagogy EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Writing and identity: Promoting critical discourse amidst double consciousness Writing as resistance in an age of demagoguery Making sense of resistance in an afterschool tutoring program: Learning from volunteer writing tutors Stray dogs: Interviews with working-class writers, edited by Daniel M. Mendoza Schools, sexual violence, and safety: Adolescent girls and writing resistance at an afterschool program in suburban Mumbai
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1