基于城市和高速公路两种不同运行场景的两种燃料电池公共交通巴士设计

IF 0.7 Q4 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY SAE International Journal of Electrified Vehicles Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.4271/14-13-02-0007
Claudio Cubito, A. Almondo, R. Ruotolo
{"title":"基于城市和高速公路两种不同运行场景的两种燃料电池公共交通巴士设计","authors":"Claudio Cubito, A. Almondo, R. Ruotolo","doi":"10.4271/14-13-02-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The transport sector is one of the major parties responsible for carbon dioxide (CO2) and pollutants emissions in Europe. For this reason, one of the main commitments of the European Commission is its decarbonization by 2035/2040. To achieve this target, during the last decades, different propulsion technologies were developed such as hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), plug-in electric vehicles (PHEVs), and battery electric vehicles (BEV). The first two proposals can be considered as bridging technology between the internal combustion engine (ICE) and the BEV because they offer at the same time comparable performance as conventional powertrains and improved efficiency. However, both technologies are struggling with the tightening of pollutants and CO2 limits. On the other hand, the BEV can offer zero emissions at the tailpipe, but it suffers from limited range capabilities and the lack of fast-charging infrastructures. Within this context, the fuel cell vehicle (FCV) appears as an interesting opportunity because it offers zero tailpipe emissions and equivalent refuelling time of the ICE. This article evaluates through mathematical simulations the performance of two fuel cell electric buses (FCEBs), which are supposed to work respectively in urban and highway driving conditions. The urban bus is equipped with a single fuel cell (FC) module of 85 kW-Net and an electric motor (EM) of 225 kW. The intercity bus is equipped with two FC modules with a total power of 170 kW-Net and two EMs of 225 kW each. A sensitivity to the battery capacity from 20 kWh to 40 kWh was performed for both FECBs. The power split between the FC module and the high-voltage battery was optimized with the Equivalent Consumption Minimization Strategy (ECMS). The two FCEBs were tested considering different portfolios of cycles: in the case of the urban bus in Braunschweig and the Standardized On-Road Test Cycles SORT1 and SORT2 were assumed as a reference, while cycles like the Highway Fuel Economy Test (HWFET), European Transient Cycle (ETC), and cruising at 100 km/h were assumed as reference for the intercity. Simulation results highlighted that the increase of battery capacity in the case of the urban bus from 20 kWh to 30 kWh reduces hydrogen (H2) consumption by 11% along the Braunschweig cycle. On the other hand, in the case of the intercity bus, the fuel consumption is less affected by the increase of capacity in the same range. In this case a reduction of 4.7% is estimated for the HWFET cycle, and it is less than 1% in the case of cruising conditions.","PeriodicalId":36261,"journal":{"name":"SAE International Journal of Electrified Vehicles","volume":"35 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design of Two Fuel Cell Buses for Public Transport According to Two Different Operating Scenarios: Urban and Motorway\",\"authors\":\"Claudio Cubito, A. Almondo, R. Ruotolo\",\"doi\":\"10.4271/14-13-02-0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The transport sector is one of the major parties responsible for carbon dioxide (CO2) and pollutants emissions in Europe. For this reason, one of the main commitments of the European Commission is its decarbonization by 2035/2040. To achieve this target, during the last decades, different propulsion technologies were developed such as hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), plug-in electric vehicles (PHEVs), and battery electric vehicles (BEV). The first two proposals can be considered as bridging technology between the internal combustion engine (ICE) and the BEV because they offer at the same time comparable performance as conventional powertrains and improved efficiency. However, both technologies are struggling with the tightening of pollutants and CO2 limits. On the other hand, the BEV can offer zero emissions at the tailpipe, but it suffers from limited range capabilities and the lack of fast-charging infrastructures. Within this context, the fuel cell vehicle (FCV) appears as an interesting opportunity because it offers zero tailpipe emissions and equivalent refuelling time of the ICE. This article evaluates through mathematical simulations the performance of two fuel cell electric buses (FCEBs), which are supposed to work respectively in urban and highway driving conditions. The urban bus is equipped with a single fuel cell (FC) module of 85 kW-Net and an electric motor (EM) of 225 kW. The intercity bus is equipped with two FC modules with a total power of 170 kW-Net and two EMs of 225 kW each. A sensitivity to the battery capacity from 20 kWh to 40 kWh was performed for both FECBs. The power split between the FC module and the high-voltage battery was optimized with the Equivalent Consumption Minimization Strategy (ECMS). The two FCEBs were tested considering different portfolios of cycles: in the case of the urban bus in Braunschweig and the Standardized On-Road Test Cycles SORT1 and SORT2 were assumed as a reference, while cycles like the Highway Fuel Economy Test (HWFET), European Transient Cycle (ETC), and cruising at 100 km/h were assumed as reference for the intercity. Simulation results highlighted that the increase of battery capacity in the case of the urban bus from 20 kWh to 30 kWh reduces hydrogen (H2) consumption by 11% along the Braunschweig cycle. On the other hand, in the case of the intercity bus, the fuel consumption is less affected by the increase of capacity in the same range. In this case a reduction of 4.7% is estimated for the HWFET cycle, and it is less than 1% in the case of cruising conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAE International Journal of Electrified Vehicles\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAE International Journal of Electrified Vehicles\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4271/14-13-02-0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE International Journal of Electrified Vehicles","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/14-13-02-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在欧洲,交通运输部门是二氧化碳和污染物排放的主要来源之一。因此,欧盟委员会的主要承诺之一是到2035/2040年实现脱碳。为了实现这一目标,在过去的几十年里,不同的推进技术被开发出来,如混合动力汽车(hev)、插电式电动汽车(phev)和电池电动汽车(BEV)。前两项建议可以被视为内燃机(ICE)和纯电动汽车之间的桥梁技术,因为它们在提供与传统动力系统相当的性能的同时,还提高了效率。然而,这两种技术都在努力应对日益严格的污染物和二氧化碳限制。另一方面,纯电动汽车可以实现零排放,但它的续航能力有限,而且缺乏快速充电基础设施。在这种背景下,燃料电池汽车(FCV)似乎是一个有趣的机会,因为它提供零尾气排放和相当于内燃机的加油时间。本文通过数学模拟对两种燃料电池电动客车分别在城市和公路行驶条件下的性能进行了评价。城市巴士配备了85千瓦净功率的单个燃料电池(FC)模块和225千瓦的电动机(EM)。城际巴士配备了两个FC模块,总功率为170 kW- net,两个EMs模块各225 kW。对两个fecb的电池容量进行了从20千瓦时到40千瓦时的灵敏度测试。采用等效功耗最小化策略(ECMS)优化FC模块与高压电池之间的功率分配。两种fceb在不同的循环组合下进行测试:在不伦瑞克的城市公交车测试中,以标准道路测试循环SORT1和SORT2为参考,而在城际测试中,以公路燃油经济性测试(HWFET)、欧洲瞬态循环(ETC)和100公里/小时巡航等循环为参考。模拟结果强调,在城市公交车的情况下,电池容量从20千瓦时增加到30千瓦时,在不伦瑞克循环过程中,氢(H2)的消耗减少了11%。另一方面,对于城际客车而言,在相同里程内,燃油消耗受容量增加的影响较小。在这种情况下,估计HWFET周期减少4.7%,在巡航条件下减少不到1%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Design of Two Fuel Cell Buses for Public Transport According to Two Different Operating Scenarios: Urban and Motorway
The transport sector is one of the major parties responsible for carbon dioxide (CO2) and pollutants emissions in Europe. For this reason, one of the main commitments of the European Commission is its decarbonization by 2035/2040. To achieve this target, during the last decades, different propulsion technologies were developed such as hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), plug-in electric vehicles (PHEVs), and battery electric vehicles (BEV). The first two proposals can be considered as bridging technology between the internal combustion engine (ICE) and the BEV because they offer at the same time comparable performance as conventional powertrains and improved efficiency. However, both technologies are struggling with the tightening of pollutants and CO2 limits. On the other hand, the BEV can offer zero emissions at the tailpipe, but it suffers from limited range capabilities and the lack of fast-charging infrastructures. Within this context, the fuel cell vehicle (FCV) appears as an interesting opportunity because it offers zero tailpipe emissions and equivalent refuelling time of the ICE. This article evaluates through mathematical simulations the performance of two fuel cell electric buses (FCEBs), which are supposed to work respectively in urban and highway driving conditions. The urban bus is equipped with a single fuel cell (FC) module of 85 kW-Net and an electric motor (EM) of 225 kW. The intercity bus is equipped with two FC modules with a total power of 170 kW-Net and two EMs of 225 kW each. A sensitivity to the battery capacity from 20 kWh to 40 kWh was performed for both FECBs. The power split between the FC module and the high-voltage battery was optimized with the Equivalent Consumption Minimization Strategy (ECMS). The two FCEBs were tested considering different portfolios of cycles: in the case of the urban bus in Braunschweig and the Standardized On-Road Test Cycles SORT1 and SORT2 were assumed as a reference, while cycles like the Highway Fuel Economy Test (HWFET), European Transient Cycle (ETC), and cruising at 100 km/h were assumed as reference for the intercity. Simulation results highlighted that the increase of battery capacity in the case of the urban bus from 20 kWh to 30 kWh reduces hydrogen (H2) consumption by 11% along the Braunschweig cycle. On the other hand, in the case of the intercity bus, the fuel consumption is less affected by the increase of capacity in the same range. In this case a reduction of 4.7% is estimated for the HWFET cycle, and it is less than 1% in the case of cruising conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SAE International Journal of Electrified Vehicles
SAE International Journal of Electrified Vehicles Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Energy-Efficient Dispatching of Battery Electric Truck Fleets with Backhauls and Time Windows Using Latent Heat Storage for Improving Battery Electric Vehicle Thermal Management System Efficiency A Multi-Physics Design Approach for Electromagnetic and Stress Performance Improvement in an Interior Permanent Magnet Motor Review of Gas Generation Behavior during Thermal Runaway of Lithium-Ion Batteries Speedy Hierarchical Eco-Planning for Connected Multi-Stack Fuel Cell Vehicles via Health-Conscious Decentralized Convex Optimization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1