图书馆使用Facebook:一项探索性分析

Noa Aharony
{"title":"图书馆使用Facebook:一项探索性分析","authors":"Noa Aharony","doi":"10.1108/00012531211244725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The current study aims to present an exploratory analysis of the use of Facebook in American public and academic libraries, with the purpose of understanding patterns of Facebook use in libraries.Design/methodology/approach – This study presents both a statistical descriptive analysis and a content analysis.Findings – The research findings show that both kinds of libraries use the information section and the wall and that there is a difference in the use of other Facebook sections, which was surprisingly limited in both kinds of libraries. In addition, public libraries use the wall and the photos section as major channels of information more than academic libraries. Concentrating on the content of the Facebook wall posts, it appears that there are some differences between the two sections (categories and sub‐categories). However, it seems that both kinds of libraries use Facebook simply as a way to deliver information to users, rather than as a venue for discussion.Originality/value – Research f...","PeriodicalId":55449,"journal":{"name":"Aslib Proceedings","volume":"881 ","pages":"358-372"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/00012531211244725","citationCount":"93","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Facebook use in libraries: an exploratory analysis\",\"authors\":\"Noa Aharony\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/00012531211244725\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose – The current study aims to present an exploratory analysis of the use of Facebook in American public and academic libraries, with the purpose of understanding patterns of Facebook use in libraries.Design/methodology/approach – This study presents both a statistical descriptive analysis and a content analysis.Findings – The research findings show that both kinds of libraries use the information section and the wall and that there is a difference in the use of other Facebook sections, which was surprisingly limited in both kinds of libraries. In addition, public libraries use the wall and the photos section as major channels of information more than academic libraries. Concentrating on the content of the Facebook wall posts, it appears that there are some differences between the two sections (categories and sub‐categories). However, it seems that both kinds of libraries use Facebook simply as a way to deliver information to users, rather than as a venue for discussion.Originality/value – Research f...\",\"PeriodicalId\":55449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aslib Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"881 \",\"pages\":\"358-372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/00012531211244725\",\"citationCount\":\"93\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aslib Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531211244725\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aslib Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531211244725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 93

摘要

目的-本研究旨在对美国公共图书馆和学术图书馆中Facebook的使用情况进行探索性分析,以了解图书馆中Facebook的使用模式。设计/方法/方法-本研究提出了统计描述性分析和内容分析。研究结果-研究结果表明,两种图书馆都使用信息部分和墙,并且在使用其他Facebook部分方面存在差异,这在两种图书馆中都是令人惊讶的有限。此外,公共图书馆比学术图书馆更多地使用墙和照片部分作为主要的信息渠道。专注于Facebook墙上帖子的内容,这两个部分(类别和子类别)之间似乎存在一些差异。然而,这两种图书馆似乎都只是将Facebook作为一种向用户传递信息的方式,而不是作为一个讨论的场所。原创性/价值-研究…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Facebook use in libraries: an exploratory analysis
Purpose – The current study aims to present an exploratory analysis of the use of Facebook in American public and academic libraries, with the purpose of understanding patterns of Facebook use in libraries.Design/methodology/approach – This study presents both a statistical descriptive analysis and a content analysis.Findings – The research findings show that both kinds of libraries use the information section and the wall and that there is a difference in the use of other Facebook sections, which was surprisingly limited in both kinds of libraries. In addition, public libraries use the wall and the photos section as major channels of information more than academic libraries. Concentrating on the content of the Facebook wall posts, it appears that there are some differences between the two sections (categories and sub‐categories). However, it seems that both kinds of libraries use Facebook simply as a way to deliver information to users, rather than as a venue for discussion.Originality/value – Research f...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aslib Proceedings
Aslib Proceedings 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Unearthing historical insights: semantic organization and application of historical newspapers from a fine-grained knowledge element perspective Investigating the consumption behavior of young adults using online food delivery platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic Factors influencing customer satisfaction with AR shopping assistant applications in e-commerce: an empirical analysis utilizing text-mining techniques The role of positive online reviews in risk-based consumer behaviours: an information processing perspective Assessing the informational credibility of conspiracy theories: online discussion about the Nord Stream damage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1