运用权力和性别视角来理解卫生保健提供者的经验和行为:一项多国定性研究。

IF 1.1 4区 物理与天体物理 Q4 PHYSICS, ATOMIC, MOLECULAR & CHEMICAL Applied Magnetic Resonance Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI:10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00420
Pooja Sripad, Summer Peterson, Daoudou Idrissou, Martha Kamanga, Abigail Kezembe, Charity Ndwiga, Chantalle Okondo, Anja Noeliarivelo Ranjalahy, Natacha Stevanovic-Fenn, Charlotte E Warren, Brady Zieman, Sanyukta Mathur
{"title":"运用权力和性别视角来理解卫生保健提供者的经验和行为:一项多国定性研究。","authors":"Pooja Sripad, Summer Peterson, Daoudou Idrissou, Martha Kamanga, Abigail Kezembe, Charity Ndwiga, Chantalle Okondo, Anja Noeliarivelo Ranjalahy, Natacha Stevanovic-Fenn, Charlotte E Warren, Brady Zieman, Sanyukta Mathur","doi":"10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A limited but growing body of literature shows that health care providers (HCPs) in reproductive, maternal, and newborn health face challenges that affect how they provide services. Our study investigates provider perspectives and behaviors using 4 interrelated power domains-beliefs and perceptions; practices and participation; access to assets; and structures-to explore how these constructs are differentially experienced based on one's gender, position, and function within the health system. We conducted a framework-based secondary analysis of qualitative in-depth interview data gathered with different cadres of HCPs across Kenya, Malawi, Madagascar, and Togo (n=123). We find across countries that power dynamics manifest in and are affected by all 4 domains, with some variation by HCP cadre and gender. At the service interface, HCPs' power derives from the nature and quality of their relationships with clients and the community. Providers' power within working relationships stems from unequal decision-making autonomy among HCP cadres. Limited and sometimes gendered access to remuneration, development opportunities, material resources, supervision quality, and emotional support affect HCPs' power to care for clients effectively. Power manifests variably among community and facility-based providers because of differences in prevailing hierarchical norms in routine and acute settings, community linkages, and type of collaboration required in their work. Our findings suggest that applying power-and secondarily, gender lenses-can elucidate consistencies in how providers perceive, internalize, and react to a range of relational and environmental stressors. The findings also have implications on how to improve the design of social behavior change interventions aimed at better supporting HCPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":469,"journal":{"name":"Applied Magnetic Resonance","volume":"50 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10698231/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying a Power and Gender Lens to Understanding Health Care Provider Experience and Behavior: A Multicountry Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Pooja Sripad, Summer Peterson, Daoudou Idrissou, Martha Kamanga, Abigail Kezembe, Charity Ndwiga, Chantalle Okondo, Anja Noeliarivelo Ranjalahy, Natacha Stevanovic-Fenn, Charlotte E Warren, Brady Zieman, Sanyukta Mathur\",\"doi\":\"10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A limited but growing body of literature shows that health care providers (HCPs) in reproductive, maternal, and newborn health face challenges that affect how they provide services. Our study investigates provider perspectives and behaviors using 4 interrelated power domains-beliefs and perceptions; practices and participation; access to assets; and structures-to explore how these constructs are differentially experienced based on one's gender, position, and function within the health system. We conducted a framework-based secondary analysis of qualitative in-depth interview data gathered with different cadres of HCPs across Kenya, Malawi, Madagascar, and Togo (n=123). We find across countries that power dynamics manifest in and are affected by all 4 domains, with some variation by HCP cadre and gender. At the service interface, HCPs' power derives from the nature and quality of their relationships with clients and the community. Providers' power within working relationships stems from unequal decision-making autonomy among HCP cadres. Limited and sometimes gendered access to remuneration, development opportunities, material resources, supervision quality, and emotional support affect HCPs' power to care for clients effectively. Power manifests variably among community and facility-based providers because of differences in prevailing hierarchical norms in routine and acute settings, community linkages, and type of collaboration required in their work. Our findings suggest that applying power-and secondarily, gender lenses-can elucidate consistencies in how providers perceive, internalize, and react to a range of relational and environmental stressors. The findings also have implications on how to improve the design of social behavior change interventions aimed at better supporting HCPs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Magnetic Resonance\",\"volume\":\"50 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10698231/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Magnetic Resonance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00420\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, ATOMIC, MOLECULAR & CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Magnetic Resonance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00420","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSICS, ATOMIC, MOLECULAR & CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有限但越来越多的文献表明,生殖、孕产妇和新生儿健康方面的卫生保健提供者(HCPs)面临影响其提供服务方式的挑战。我们的研究使用4个相互关联的权力领域——信念和感知——来调查提供者的观点和行为;实践与参与;获得资产;结构-探索这些结构是如何根据一个人在卫生系统中的性别、地位和功能而不同地体验的。我们对肯尼亚、马拉维、马达加斯加和多哥的不同HCPs干部收集的定性深度访谈数据进行了基于框架的二次分析(n=123)。我们发现,各国的权力动态都体现在这四个领域,并受到这四个领域的影响,但HCP干部和性别存在一定差异。在服务界面上,HCPs的权力来源于他们与客户和社区关系的性质和质量。提供者在工作关系中的权力源于HCP干部之间不平等的决策自主权。在薪酬、发展机会、物质资源、监管质量和情感支持方面,有限的(有时是性别的)机会会影响医护人员有效照顾客户的能力。权力在社区和以设施为基础的提供者之间的表现是不同的,因为在日常和紧急环境中普遍存在的等级规范、社区联系以及他们工作中所需的合作类型存在差异。我们的研究结果表明,运用权力——其次是性别视角——可以阐明提供者如何感知、内化和应对一系列关系和环境压力因素的一致性。研究结果还对如何改进旨在更好地支持hcp的社会行为改变干预措施的设计具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Applying a Power and Gender Lens to Understanding Health Care Provider Experience and Behavior: A Multicountry Qualitative Study.

A limited but growing body of literature shows that health care providers (HCPs) in reproductive, maternal, and newborn health face challenges that affect how they provide services. Our study investigates provider perspectives and behaviors using 4 interrelated power domains-beliefs and perceptions; practices and participation; access to assets; and structures-to explore how these constructs are differentially experienced based on one's gender, position, and function within the health system. We conducted a framework-based secondary analysis of qualitative in-depth interview data gathered with different cadres of HCPs across Kenya, Malawi, Madagascar, and Togo (n=123). We find across countries that power dynamics manifest in and are affected by all 4 domains, with some variation by HCP cadre and gender. At the service interface, HCPs' power derives from the nature and quality of their relationships with clients and the community. Providers' power within working relationships stems from unequal decision-making autonomy among HCP cadres. Limited and sometimes gendered access to remuneration, development opportunities, material resources, supervision quality, and emotional support affect HCPs' power to care for clients effectively. Power manifests variably among community and facility-based providers because of differences in prevailing hierarchical norms in routine and acute settings, community linkages, and type of collaboration required in their work. Our findings suggest that applying power-and secondarily, gender lenses-can elucidate consistencies in how providers perceive, internalize, and react to a range of relational and environmental stressors. The findings also have implications on how to improve the design of social behavior change interventions aimed at better supporting HCPs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Magnetic Resonance
Applied Magnetic Resonance 物理-光谱学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Magnetic Resonance provides an international forum for the application of magnetic resonance in physics, chemistry, biology, medicine, geochemistry, ecology, engineering, and related fields. The contents include articles with a strong emphasis on new applications, and on new experimental methods. Additional features include book reviews and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Deep-Learning Segmentation of Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis in Rats Using U-Net 3 + by 3D UTE-MRI Influence of Ge concentration on magnetic properties of \(\hbox {Co}_{(1-x)} \hbox {Ge}_{x}\) thin films A Method for Analyzing Data from 1- and 2-Dimensional Relaxation and Diffusion NMR Experiments by Determination of their Expectation Values and Standard Deviations Photocurrent EDMR Measurement and Carrier Behavior of TIPS-Pentacene Under FET Device Operation Nitroxide Spin Labels for Exploring Relationships Between Molecular Structure, Microenvironment and EPR Parameters: A Mini-review Dedicated to Carlo Corvaja
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1