{"title":"选择和b.f.斯金纳:对“选择主义的连续近似:斯金纳在20世纪30年代和40年代的行为框架”的评论,leÃo和neto。","authors":"W. Baum","doi":"10.5514/rmac.v44.i2.68542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Skinner’s views about selection evolved. Leao and Neto show convincingly that his selectionism was at best nascent in the 1930s and 1940s. Their arguments persuade me that no concept of selection by consequences may be found in Skinner’s published writings in those decades.","PeriodicalId":53598,"journal":{"name":"Revista Mexicana de Analisis de la Conducta","volume":"57 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SELECTION AND B. F. SKINNER: COMMENTS ON “SUCCESSIVE APPROXIMATIONS TO SELECTIONISM: SKINNER’S FRAMEWORK FOR BEHAVIOR IN THE 1930S AND 1940S,” BY LEÃO AND NETO.\",\"authors\":\"W. Baum\",\"doi\":\"10.5514/rmac.v44.i2.68542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Skinner’s views about selection evolved. Leao and Neto show convincingly that his selectionism was at best nascent in the 1930s and 1940s. Their arguments persuade me that no concept of selection by consequences may be found in Skinner’s published writings in those decades.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53598,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Mexicana de Analisis de la Conducta\",\"volume\":\"57 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Mexicana de Analisis de la Conducta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5514/rmac.v44.i2.68542\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Mexicana de Analisis de la Conducta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5514/rmac.v44.i2.68542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
SELECTION AND B. F. SKINNER: COMMENTS ON “SUCCESSIVE APPROXIMATIONS TO SELECTIONISM: SKINNER’S FRAMEWORK FOR BEHAVIOR IN THE 1930S AND 1940S,” BY LEÃO AND NETO.
Skinner’s views about selection evolved. Leao and Neto show convincingly that his selectionism was at best nascent in the 1930s and 1940s. Their arguments persuade me that no concept of selection by consequences may be found in Skinner’s published writings in those decades.