萨法维王朝和莫卧儿王朝的城市桥梁:自然的视觉和体现体验

IF 0.5 0 ASIAN STUDIES South Asian Studies Pub Date : 2019-01-02 DOI:10.1080/02666030.2019.1605573
S. Hosseini
{"title":"萨法维王朝和莫卧儿王朝的城市桥梁:自然的视觉和体现体验","authors":"S. Hosseini","doi":"10.1080/02666030.2019.1605573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among the praiseworthy features of Isfahan, European travellers who visited the city throughout the seventeenth century admired the Khājū and Allāhvirdīkhān Bridges, particularly the galleries that lined their main passage and offered passers-by opportunities to rest and enjoy the breeze and expansive views of the river. Similarly, the Nūrābād Bridge and Jaunpur’s Shāhī Bridge in Mughal India, with their chhatrīs located on either side, provided comparable experiences for those traversing their length. Focusing on these four bridges, built between 1568 and 1659, this paper examines the novel architectural layout of these public structures within the framework of manzar, and argues for understanding the secondary spaces of these bridges as a thematic extension of the renowned Safavid and Mughal waterfront pavilions that were purposefully designed to engage with the surrounding landscape. As elements that were previously limited to royal and elite establishments, these viewing platforms empowered a particular mode of visual and embodied engagement with the landscape, which favoured immersion in natural settings and considered nature as a reflection of God and a text to decode – practices with roots in Turco-nomadic sensibilities towards nature, and the growth and popularity of mystic knowledge and esoteric practices in the post-Mongol eastern Islamic lands.","PeriodicalId":52006,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Studies","volume":"40 1","pages":"107 - 128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02666030.2019.1605573","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safavid and Mughal Urban Bridges: Visual and Embodied Experience of Nature\",\"authors\":\"S. Hosseini\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02666030.2019.1605573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Among the praiseworthy features of Isfahan, European travellers who visited the city throughout the seventeenth century admired the Khājū and Allāhvirdīkhān Bridges, particularly the galleries that lined their main passage and offered passers-by opportunities to rest and enjoy the breeze and expansive views of the river. Similarly, the Nūrābād Bridge and Jaunpur’s Shāhī Bridge in Mughal India, with their chhatrīs located on either side, provided comparable experiences for those traversing their length. Focusing on these four bridges, built between 1568 and 1659, this paper examines the novel architectural layout of these public structures within the framework of manzar, and argues for understanding the secondary spaces of these bridges as a thematic extension of the renowned Safavid and Mughal waterfront pavilions that were purposefully designed to engage with the surrounding landscape. As elements that were previously limited to royal and elite establishments, these viewing platforms empowered a particular mode of visual and embodied engagement with the landscape, which favoured immersion in natural settings and considered nature as a reflection of God and a text to decode – practices with roots in Turco-nomadic sensibilities towards nature, and the growth and popularity of mystic knowledge and esoteric practices in the post-Mongol eastern Islamic lands.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South Asian Studies\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"107 - 128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02666030.2019.1605573\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South Asian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1095\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02666030.2019.1605573\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1095","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02666030.2019.1605573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在伊斯法罕值得称道的特色中,17世纪到访这座城市的欧洲游客对Khājū和Allāhvirdīkhān的桥梁赞叹不已,尤其是那些排列在主干道上的廊道,它们为路人提供了休息的机会,让他们享受微风和广阔的河流景观。同样,印度莫卧儿王朝的Nūrābād桥和Jaunpur的Shāhī桥,它们的chhatrīs位于两侧,为穿越它们的人提供了类似的体验。本文以这四座建于1568年至1659年之间的桥梁为重点,研究了这些公共结构在曼扎尔框架内的新颖建筑布局,并主张将这些桥梁的次要空间理解为著名的萨法维和莫卧儿海滨亭子的主题延伸,这些亭子是有目的地设计的,与周围的景观相结合。作为以前仅限于皇室和精英机构的元素,这些观景台赋予了一种特殊的视觉模式,并体现了与景观的接触,这种模式有利于沉浸在自然环境中,并将自然视为上帝的反映和文本解码-植根于突厥游牧民族对自然的敏感性的实践,以及神秘知识和深奥实践的增长和普及后蒙古东部伊斯兰土地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safavid and Mughal Urban Bridges: Visual and Embodied Experience of Nature
Among the praiseworthy features of Isfahan, European travellers who visited the city throughout the seventeenth century admired the Khājū and Allāhvirdīkhān Bridges, particularly the galleries that lined their main passage and offered passers-by opportunities to rest and enjoy the breeze and expansive views of the river. Similarly, the Nūrābād Bridge and Jaunpur’s Shāhī Bridge in Mughal India, with their chhatrīs located on either side, provided comparable experiences for those traversing their length. Focusing on these four bridges, built between 1568 and 1659, this paper examines the novel architectural layout of these public structures within the framework of manzar, and argues for understanding the secondary spaces of these bridges as a thematic extension of the renowned Safavid and Mughal waterfront pavilions that were purposefully designed to engage with the surrounding landscape. As elements that were previously limited to royal and elite establishments, these viewing platforms empowered a particular mode of visual and embodied engagement with the landscape, which favoured immersion in natural settings and considered nature as a reflection of God and a text to decode – practices with roots in Turco-nomadic sensibilities towards nature, and the growth and popularity of mystic knowledge and esoteric practices in the post-Mongol eastern Islamic lands.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
South Asian Studies
South Asian Studies ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Were the Cretulae (Clay Sealings) from the Indus Port Town of Lothal Part of an Administrative Archive? Contextual, Interpretive, and Comparative Evidence Mudgagiri, a Pāla “Jayaskandhāvāra”: An Assessment of Recent Sculptural and Inscriptional Findings at Munger, Bihar Bamiyan Comes to Bangkok: Situating the Buddha of the Cave Museum at Wat Saket Why Ananda Coomaraswamy’s Time in Sri Lanka (Still) Matters Aesthetic of Light and Time: An Intellectual History of Pictorialism from India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1