对遗产税的道德反对

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting Journal of Australian Taxation Pub Date : 2018-07-26 DOI:10.1093/OSO/9780199609222.003.0010
S. White
{"title":"对遗产税的道德反对","authors":"S. White","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780199609222.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Taxation of wealth transfers across generations (‘inheritance tax’) is strongly supported by social justice considerations but is also politically and morally contentious. As well as citing concerns about the possible impact on motives to work and save, critics present several moral objections to inheritance tax: it allegedly entails ‘double taxation’; it taxes citizens differently according to how they use their wealth, violating equity; it penalizes the ‘virtuous’ use of personal wealth; and it targets the wrong problem, which is not unequal holdings of wealth as such but unequal consumption. This paper addresses each of these four criticisms, indicates their flaws and limitations, and shows that they do not rebut the case for inheritance tax on grounds of social justice.","PeriodicalId":36556,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Australian Taxation","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moral Objections to Inheritance Tax\",\"authors\":\"S. White\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OSO/9780199609222.003.0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Taxation of wealth transfers across generations (‘inheritance tax’) is strongly supported by social justice considerations but is also politically and morally contentious. As well as citing concerns about the possible impact on motives to work and save, critics present several moral objections to inheritance tax: it allegedly entails ‘double taxation’; it taxes citizens differently according to how they use their wealth, violating equity; it penalizes the ‘virtuous’ use of personal wealth; and it targets the wrong problem, which is not unequal holdings of wealth as such but unequal consumption. This paper addresses each of these four criticisms, indicates their flaws and limitations, and shows that they do not rebut the case for inheritance tax on grounds of social justice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Australian Taxation\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Australian Taxation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780199609222.003.0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Australian Taxation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780199609222.003.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

对代际财富转移征税(“遗产税”)得到社会正义考虑的大力支持,但在政治和道德上也存在争议。除了对可能影响工作和储蓄动机的担忧外,批评者还对遗产税提出了几个道德上的反对意见:据称遗产税会“双重征税”;它根据公民使用财富的方式对他们征收不同的税,违反了公平;它惩罚“有道德”地使用个人财富;而且它瞄准了错误的问题,这个问题不是财富持有不平等,而是消费不平等。本文分别论述了这四种批评,指出了它们的缺陷和局限性,并表明它们没有以社会正义为理由反驳遗产税的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Moral Objections to Inheritance Tax
Taxation of wealth transfers across generations (‘inheritance tax’) is strongly supported by social justice considerations but is also politically and morally contentious. As well as citing concerns about the possible impact on motives to work and save, critics present several moral objections to inheritance tax: it allegedly entails ‘double taxation’; it taxes citizens differently according to how they use their wealth, violating equity; it penalizes the ‘virtuous’ use of personal wealth; and it targets the wrong problem, which is not unequal holdings of wealth as such but unequal consumption. This paper addresses each of these four criticisms, indicates their flaws and limitations, and shows that they do not rebut the case for inheritance tax on grounds of social justice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Australian Taxation
Journal of Australian Taxation Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Moral Objections to Inheritance Tax Striving for the Middle Ground The Politics of Land Value Taxation What Political Philosophy Should Learn from Economics about Taxation Libertarianism and Taxation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1