孟德斯鸠思想中“法”的形式和类型

Q4 Arts and Humanities Montesquieu.it Pub Date : 2017-02-13 DOI:10.6092/ISSN.2421-4124/6701
Massimiliano Bravi
{"title":"孟德斯鸠思想中“法”的形式和类型","authors":"Massimiliano Bravi","doi":"10.6092/ISSN.2421-4124/6701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Montesquieu used the concept of “law” to indicate, in a broad sense, the multifarious concatenations of causes that are intertwined in the historical determination of human societies. The French thinker distinguished the “laws” in plurime typologies, that he related to the cultural, political, moral, legal, religious and climatic variables, whose incidence is stratified into the systemic composition of each civilization, through the commixture of reciprocal interdependencies that forge the “general spirit” of nations. Furthermore, Montesquieu combined his peculiar methodological approach with the principles of “jusnaturalism”, in fact took for granted the existence of “natural laws”, among which he included the instinct for “sociability”, that laid as the primary foundation of all community aggregates. In this regard, Montesquieu directed harsh criticisms at Hobbes, whereas revealed evident affinities with Grotius, Pufendorf and Locke, although without adhering to the “social contract theory”.","PeriodicalId":36096,"journal":{"name":"Montesquieu.it","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forms and types of \\\"law\\\" in the thought of Montesquieu\",\"authors\":\"Massimiliano Bravi\",\"doi\":\"10.6092/ISSN.2421-4124/6701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Montesquieu used the concept of “law” to indicate, in a broad sense, the multifarious concatenations of causes that are intertwined in the historical determination of human societies. The French thinker distinguished the “laws” in plurime typologies, that he related to the cultural, political, moral, legal, religious and climatic variables, whose incidence is stratified into the systemic composition of each civilization, through the commixture of reciprocal interdependencies that forge the “general spirit” of nations. Furthermore, Montesquieu combined his peculiar methodological approach with the principles of “jusnaturalism”, in fact took for granted the existence of “natural laws”, among which he included the instinct for “sociability”, that laid as the primary foundation of all community aggregates. In this regard, Montesquieu directed harsh criticisms at Hobbes, whereas revealed evident affinities with Grotius, Pufendorf and Locke, although without adhering to the “social contract theory”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Montesquieu.it\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Montesquieu.it\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6092/ISSN.2421-4124/6701\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Montesquieu.it","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6092/ISSN.2421-4124/6701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

孟德斯鸠用“法”这个概念,从广义上说,是指在人类社会的历史决定中交织在一起的各种各样的原因。这位法国思想家以多元类型学区分了“法律”,他将其与文化、政治、道德、法律、宗教和气候变量联系起来,通过相互依存的混合,形成了国家的“一般精神”,这些变量的发生被分层成每个文明的系统组成。此外,孟德斯鸠将其独特的方法论方法与“自然主义”的原则相结合,事实上,他认为“自然法则”的存在是理所当然的,其中他包括了“社交性”的本能,这是所有社区聚集的主要基础。在这方面,孟德斯鸠对霍布斯进行了严厉的批评,而与格劳秀斯、普芬多夫和洛克有着明显的联系,尽管他没有坚持“社会契约论”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Forms and types of "law" in the thought of Montesquieu
Montesquieu used the concept of “law” to indicate, in a broad sense, the multifarious concatenations of causes that are intertwined in the historical determination of human societies. The French thinker distinguished the “laws” in plurime typologies, that he related to the cultural, political, moral, legal, religious and climatic variables, whose incidence is stratified into the systemic composition of each civilization, through the commixture of reciprocal interdependencies that forge the “general spirit” of nations. Furthermore, Montesquieu combined his peculiar methodological approach with the principles of “jusnaturalism”, in fact took for granted the existence of “natural laws”, among which he included the instinct for “sociability”, that laid as the primary foundation of all community aggregates. In this regard, Montesquieu directed harsh criticisms at Hobbes, whereas revealed evident affinities with Grotius, Pufendorf and Locke, although without adhering to the “social contract theory”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Montesquieu.it
Montesquieu.it Arts and Humanities-History
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Contesti smithiani: transizione, progresso e conflitto Considerazioni su Voltaire studioso di Pietro il Grande e della Russia «Orgogliose come demoni»: le monache ribelli di Port-Royal L’esperienza e la certezza. Postille a Pascal, Opere complete. Prima tra-duzione italiana , testi francesi e latini a fronte, a cura di M.V. Romeo, Firenze-Milano, Giunti-Bompiani, 2020, XXXIX-3133 pp. Lavoro e libertà nelle speculazioni di Gianvincenzo Gravina, di Giambattista Vico e di Francesco Longano
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1